• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

I’m not reading all the drivel on this thread but has anyone mentioned that the earth is round ?

Asking for all the sane, logical, educated people on here.
 

Nukehasslefan said:
It comes down to who wants to delve into it and see through to a bigger picture outside of the box.
There are those that can and those that can't and those that do not care.
That's life.
Click to expand...
must be 99.9% of us are wrong, thick, liars etc and you know better than us all. we are unable to think outside the box, unlike the sage that is you
Big Jeff said:
I’m not reading all the drivel on this thread but has anyone mentioned that the earth is round ?

Asking for all the sane, logical, educated people on here.
Click to expand...
it's not if you look through a scope and only look at the pinpoint of the crosshair only. proves the earth is flat through atmospheric stacking over dense layers and superfluids
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
There's a very good reason. It shows what Earth is not and it is not a spinning globe we are told we supposedly walk upon or sail upon and whatnot.

This is one of the best ways to show the globe up as the fictional story it is. IMO.

Anyone can look through a scope regardless of how many years of doing it but the same issue arises. You cannot see over a downward curve and keep the ground or sea on the pinpoint unless you can converge the ground or sea to the sky which cannot be done on a downward curve as you would only get sky on your pinpoint on your scope.
Click to expand...
This is so utterly mistaken and wrong it's beyond belief.
Draw a simple diagram that demonstrates this and explains why pinpoint and level matters at all.
 
payne said:
must be 99.9% of us are wrong, thick, liars etc and you know better than us all. we are unable to think outside the box, unlike the sage that is you

it's not if you look through a scope and only look at the pinpoint of the crosshair only. proves the earth is flat through atmospheric stacking over dense layers and superfluids
Click to expand...
We may all be wrong.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
And those who think they're outside of the box but have only really imagined the box and put themselves in another, more stupid box.
Click to expand...
we all imagine, some of us don't think about the box, some of us lift the lid of the box, some of us stay firmly in the box. many boxes, many people, many idea. the world.............
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
It's not a narrative, it's simple geometry.

In your opinion, which is amusing to me

Exactly, just your point of view. Not reality.

Only if you're so dense that you refuse to move the pissing pinpoint

It's so easily demonstrated that there's only one person on this whole thread who would fail to grasp it.

The pinpoint view is only being discussed because you mistakenly think it proves something for you. It doesn't.
If I aim a scope at something I want to view and find it partially obscured, I can raise the scope to see over the obstruction. Then, if needed, adjust the angle of the scope to point at the same thing.
Click to expand...
He is back to not understanding field of view. Way way back it was shown that even on a very large tower with a perfectly level scope, although the horizon would be below a cross hair (most scopes don't have cross hairs but there are a number of images available of accurate surveying tools that show exactly this - the horizon below the line), you would need a field of view of something crazy like 0.002 degrees to not be able to see the horizon. Only the massive astrometrical scopes on mountain tops have a FoV that small.

Add to that a lack of understanding of the scale of the earth and quite how big it is, and you have one confused, frightened little chap.
 
0verlord44 said:
And space x and their falcon 9’s that they land back on earth?
Click to expand...
Space X might land the rockets but they don't go to space as it doesn't exist, you can't travel in no medium and it would hit off the underside of the dome if it went to high. It all makes sense.
 
The Snockerty Friddle said:
This is so utterly mistaken and wrong it's beyond belief.
Draw a simple diagram that demonstrates this and explains why pinpoint and level matters at all.
Click to expand...
Draw a curve and place your scopes on it like was mentioned with the bridge and towers and show me how those two scope crosshairs can be seen pinpoint to pinpoint.

The bridge argument kills off the scope view.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top