Put a flat earthier into space

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Seeing beyond the curve would offer you a pinpoint sky and no horizon at the pinpoint.

Meaningless collection of words

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Struggling to know what happens when I reach the end of the earth?

You won't so you're ok.

Just spent the last twenty minutes enjoying a coffee in the garden and watching the beauty sunrise. Once it had breached the horizon, it’s too bright to look at directly and we’ve all seen the warning about people going blind. I wonder just how strong the projector would need to be and how many blinding incidents there have been over the millennia with people and animals staring down into the place it emanates from.

Many people watch the sun come into view and do not get blinded.

who taught you your dome view?

Piece-by-piece research.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

The reality is they simply build towers plumb and thicker at the base than the top but each section meets the plumb centre all the way to the top.

This bit is true enough, but the tops are still further apart due to the curvature.

 

[legend7]

The soldiers in those days were only 1mm tall against the might of the Newcastlearianationists who were on average 6 feet 7 and we're all nicknamed the Pope-arites.

Must have been some big atmospheric stacking that day.
Halfwit

 

[Pancho]

8 inches per mile squared sees to that.

Again demonstrating that you are mathematically illiterate.

Stop parroting stuff that you don't understand from stupid flat earth youtube videos made by con men and idiots.

 

[payne]

You won't so you're ok.

Many people watch the sun come into view and do not get blinded.

Piece-by-piece research.

And because you used the correct logic you were able to come to the truth on all elements better than anyone to previously have lived. Well done.

 

[Kevj]

I have no issue with the bridge building.
None of what you say offers anything that puts forward any reality of taking curvature into account.

Aren’t you a painter and decorator? You haven’t been involved in the design, engineering or building of any bridges so you are far from qualified to comment.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

People, normal day to day people, have been photographing and sharing photos of it for years, people study it professionally and also as a hobby, it would be noticed pretty quickly if things had changed.
But you know that.

Over a few hundred years basically.
Nothing in the overall setup.

You're told it's a cement-like/powder surface and a rock structure full of craters that happen to be facing the Earth.
What made them? Were people throwing rocks at them from Earth?

On a serious note, what's the story behind that?

The alternative is the moon is a plate that's been arced on from the central energy of the sun and is projected into the sky and reflected back off the dome which acts like a large mirror and we see a sort of holographic image from that centre. IMO.

 

[payne]

Aren’t you a painter and decorator? You haven’t been involved in the design, engineering or building of any bridges so you are far from qualified to comment.

He's an expert in every field and he can paint too

 

[Nukehasslefan]

No it's simply that you don't understand a fairly simple concept because you are mathematically illiterate.

And you're more than welcome to have those thoughts.

 

[payne]

Over a few hundred years basically.
Nothing in the overall setup.

You're told it's a cement-like/powder surface and a rock structure full of craters that happen to be facing the Earth.
What made them? Were people throwing rocks at them from Earth?

On a serious note, what's the story behind that?

The alternative is the moon is a plate that's been arced on from the central energy of the sun and is projected into the sky and reflected back off the dome which acts like a large mirror and we see a sort of holographic image from that centre. IMO.

New information. Thank you

 

[DaveH]

How convenient.

Yes. You are talking extreme cold temperatures where even gasses start to condense, but with a blazing hot carbon arc lamp in the middle projecting the sun and everything else, warming the earth. While in most circumstances this combination of extreme cold and extreme heat should cause massive cloud and fog formation, it doesn't there. If it did then there is the danger of clouds rolling over projection central and blotting out the sun, stars and moon for everyone on earth.

No explanation has been given as to why projection central has it's own special weather system and how it manages to be both really cold and really hot at the same time. But then I guess it is the same as my question a few days ago. "Does the moon always appear the same size or does it change in size". The answer to that was both.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You really are so paranoid. It's frightening.

Maybe. I call it questioning everything and believing nothing that cannot be directly proven but also accepting things that offer some feasibility.
Accepting and believing are two entirely separate mindsets.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

On a serious note, what's the story behind that?

The alternative is the moon is a plate that's been arced on from the central energy of the sun and is projected into the sky and reflected back off the dome which acts like a large mirror and we see a sort of holographic image from that centre. IMO.

That's your serious note?

 

[DaveH]

Atmospheric magnification and less atmospheric agitation will offer a clearer path into distance.

If the light gets back to you you'll see objects within at distance. Distances that cannot be seen if we were on a globe.
8 inches per mile squared sees to that.

That seems like waffle to say you don't know why this effect of over 3 miles to the horizon can not be seen anywhere else and never happens in the north sea, allowing us to see across to the rest of Europe.

The real reason is because it is bollocks.

 

[legend7]

Over a few hundred years basically.
Nothing in the overall setup.

You're told it's a cement-like/powder surface and a rock structure full of craters that happen to be facing the Earth.
What made them? Were people throwing rocks at them from Earth?

On a serious note, what's the story behind that?

The alternative is the moon is a plate that's been arced on from the central energy of the sun and is projected into the sky and reflected back off the dome which acts like a large mirror and we see a sort of holographic image from that centre. IMO.

Hold on numbskull, you said the dome is constantly melting, freezing, bits falling off that look like shooting stars/meteors, these happen every single day so surely it wouldn't take long to look different, even a year or so should be noticeably different if the "dome" is as flexible and fluid as you describe.

 

[DaveH]

Over a few hundred years basically.
Nothing in the overall setup.

You're told it's a cement-like/powder surface and a rock structure full of craters that happen to be facing the Earth.
What made them? Were people throwing rocks at them from Earth?

On a serious note, what's the story behind that?

The alternative is the moon is a plate that's been arced on from the central energy of the sun and is projected into the sky and reflected back off the dome which acts like a large mirror and we see a sort of holographic image from that centre. IMO.

Are you seriously asking what made craters on the moon?

 

[payne]

Maybe. I call it questioning everything and believing nothing that cannot be directly proven but also accepting things that offer some feasibility.
Accepting and believing are two entirely separate mindsets.

You have no clue

 

[taipeisafc]

Hold on numbskull, you said the dome is constantly melting, freezing, bits falling off that look like shooting stars/meteors, these happen every single day so surely it wouldn't take long to look different, even a year or so should be noticeably different if the "dome" is as flexible and fluid as you describe.

Quality use of numbskull there an underused word

 

[legend7]

Are you seriously asking what made craters on the moon?

There are no craters and no moon, keep up man