• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Women’s Euros 2022

Status
Not open for further replies.
Imagine your daughter grafting her whole life to make it for her country and play in a major tournament…….just for a load of knackers who are stuck in the 40’s and likely can’t play themselves to write her off.

This board man :lol:
Same helmets who want Zcars as our run out theme.
This might not go down too well but why are the BBC pushing this sport down our throats on their main channel?
Unbelievable the coverage for this minority sport.
Hi Dom,

Next time, just bury your head in the ground (or the oven?)

Cheers.
 

I replied she was the greatest female tennis player.

I'm not downplaying women's sports but women tennis players cannot compete with men so there is no comparison. How is that downplaying the sport?
If the question posed to you was how many male tennis players would Serena beat, there would be no issue with your answer.

There's any easy comparison in what an individual has been able to achieve while playing against their own sex, and Serena has achieved more than the big 3 in the mens game.
 
You could argue that the majority of people actually interested in that game were there though?
I could say the same of the average 1000 people that turn up to womens football as well.




"Smaller clubs in the WSL do not tend to do quite as well on the gate. Most of the teams outside of the top three attract between 500 and 1000, although clubs are always working to try and encourage new fans."

Mind you, from what I hear there was quite a bit of interest back in Sunderland whilst the 50,000 fans were aware so you'd be wrong on the first one
 
I’m out of this thread. Knuckledraggers can spout their bile elsewhere

ive noticed though when calling them out, they resort to diversion and attack the person asking the question

its a sign of guilt. They. Should be ashamed with themselves to live in a world where they want more inequality and more racism

and I’m a nasty piece of work for not wanting to live in such a world. Well there you go that’s me.
 
All the woke fannies can fuck right of….
Another one here. Anti woke are you. Woke is for equality and against racism

all the f***ing anti woke caveman can go and fuck off, then fuck off a bit more in your numbskull case
 
Last edited:
If the question posed to you was how many male tennis players would Serena beat, there would be no issue with your answer.

There's any easy comparison in what an individual has been able to achieve while playing against their own sex, and Serena has achieved more than the big 3 in the mens game.
I've already said she is the best female tennis player of all time. What she has done in the game is astonishing.

The question was where do you rate Serena Williams as a tennis player. (not female tennis player) I'm saying she would not be in top 1000.
 
How do you propose the WSL and our national team rise above your "sub par" level that would allow women to have media coverage of their sport?
Honestly? I have no idea, I'm not the target audience. I maybe shouldn't even comment on these threads as nothing will convince me it's worth watching. As I said, I'm probably a dinosaur and too long in the tooth to change my ways. Sepp Blatter's ideas on tighter shorts were eye catching but inappropriate ;)
 
Honestly? I have no idea, I'm not the target audience. I maybe shouldn't even comment on these threads as nothing will convince me it's worth watching. As I said, I'm probably a dinosaur and too long in the tooth to change my ways. Sepp Blatter's ideas on tighter shorts were eye catching but inappropriate ;)
I think you are missing out as I enjoyed the game but there is absolutely nothing wrong in not being interested.
 
Fair enough. If it's cheap I suppose.
Mind you, there are plenty of other sports they could be covering if cheap is the criteria
Which ones would cost similar and get the same viewing figures.
Bearing in mind England vs Austria had over 4 million watching

Which is better viewing figures than the snooker final, challenge cup final, Winter Olympics, lawn bowls. Bigger than the final of the women’s tennis- which no one objects to coverage of.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top