• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Russia invading Ukraine (NEWS/UPDATES)

Status
Not open for further replies.

I wonder how secure Putin’s inner circle is. I'm sure there's a fair few questioning the wisdom of this and wondering whether he's mentally stable enough to have control of nuclear weapons.
They've got to have a protocol for declaring him unfit, just put him in a straight jacket and lock him up. Those two generals today looked far from sold on his next steps.
 
The most effective weapon against an occupying force is the IED
Cheap, easy to make, easy to hide, low risk and extremely effective.
If Russia do take some or all of Ukraine just flood the place with them.
Whilst I agree with you on the effectiveness of an ied in a built up area, personally I class them in the same league as mines. Indiscriminate and not always lethal. Agreed that you kill a soldier you remove 1 from the the battle. Wound a soldier you take 2 or more. Problem is the same can be said if civilians
 
Slightly off-topic, but hopefully, if things calm down, maybe a good time to push egos aside and have talks about re-entering the EU.

I think this has proven that unity is essential, and a lot of pros/cons were about trivial matters.
Think it would be foolish to at least not put feelers out.
 
Slightly off-topic, but hopefully, if things calm down, maybe a good time to push egos aside and have talks about re-entering the EU.

I think this has proven that unity is essential, and a lot of pros/cons were about trivial matters.
To quote the tories “now is not the time”

Let’s not forget the EU were very slow off the mark and took days to get full agreement to properly isolate Russia

Apart from our stance on immigration I think we’ve been much more on the ball than them
 
BP getting rid of its stake in Rosneft.

You must be logged on to see media items
And how could any company in the world for the foreseeable future invest in Russia; work with a Russian partner; have a Russian company in their supply chain; rely on Russian gas? Knowing at any minute it could all collapse.

They have no option but regime change. Or, er, become North Korea with nukes.
 
And as that Belarus colonel said "Ukraine have done the most important thing to survive the first 72 hours". Lots of easy to operate and military hardware flooding in now like NLAW's & SAM's.

Imm surprised the Russians haven't attempted to seal the borders. No good conducting a siege if weapons, personnel and aid are flooding in.
 
I wonder how secure Putin’s inner circle is. I'm sure there's a fair few questioning the wisdom of this and wondering whether he's mentally stable enough to have control of nuclear weapons.
I can imagine there's very few people get close to him, he only ever seems to be seen in two rooms publicly these days too. I reckon there's a lot of paranoia going on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top