• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Russia invading Ukraine (NEWS/UPDATES)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good map here that shows currently the separatists only hold about 1/3 rd of Donbas and 1/4 of Luhansk. Unless Ukraine roll over now Putin has recognised all of it there is enough fighting still to happen in these regions alone that will kick off in the next few days

You must be logged on to see media items
 

How would you stop it though? Invade Scotland?

We'd be in the same situation Russia is in now. Act like you're going to invade to try and force some sort of agreement from Scotland that they won't join this Russia-led military alliance and if they don't blink then invade. It would be a shitshow but better than allowing Russia to build up troops and a nuclear arsenal at our border.

I feel like people have a cartoonish view of Russia at times and forget that they have national interests and will defend them like everybody else. People seem to think that we can just go around threatening what another country - rightly or wrongly - considers its supreme interest without any consequences.
 
We'd be in the same situation Russia is in now. Act like you're going to invade to try and force some sort of agreement from Scotland that they won't join this Russia-led military alliance and if they don't blink then invade. It would be a shitshow but better than allowing Russia to build up troops and a nuclear arsenal at our border.

I feel like people have a cartoonish view of Russia at times and forget that they have national interests and will defend them like everybody else. People seem to think that we can just go around threatening what another country - rightly or wrongly - considers its supreme interest without any consequences.

Scotland would have every right to host Russian troops if they wanted as long as they didn’t invade England.

But they wouldn’t do that. Because the reason countries join NATO is people like democracy, freedom of speech and assembly. So they are attracted to the US and to the west. So they join if they can.

The only people who are attracted to authoritarian right wing dictatorships such as Putins Russia is if they are coerced.

The reason the west expands is the survival of the fittest. Our model of governance is better. One day Russia will join us.
 
Two USAF MC-130J Commando IIs circling at the Ukraine border right now:


Boeing CV-22B Osprey following one of them too.
 
Last edited:
The same supporters who hate Crobyn for being a Commie and too close to Russia 🤔🤔

I don't think Corbyn and the Looney Left are pro-Russian, it's just that they are anti-West/NATO. They be happy giving over Ukraine to Putin it it meant being able to blame the UK, US and other Western powers for it.
 
At least it's peacekeeping.

@spectatorindex: BREAKING: Putin orders troops into Ukraine for peacekeeping mission in Donetsk and Luhansk
 
Scotland would have every right to host Russian troops if they wanted as long as they didn’t invade England.

But they wouldn’t do that. Because the reason countries join NATO is people like democracy, freedom of speech and assembly. So they are attracted to the US and to the west. So they join if they can.

The only people who are attracted to authoritarian right wing dictatorships such as Putins Russia is if they are coerced.

The reason the west expands is the survival of the fittest. Our model of governance is better. One day Russia will join us.

They'd have the right but it would be strongly in our national interests not to let it happen.
 
I feel like people have a cartoonish view of Russia at times and forget that they have national interests and will defend them like everybody else. People seem to think that we can just go around threatening what another country - rightly or wrongly - considers its supreme interest without any consequences.
Isn't that what they're doing?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top