• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

*~*~* Bolton v Sunderland match thread *~*~*

Status
Not open for further replies.

And we’ve had both of our good winning runs playing 4 at the back.
You do realise that this sentences sums up the problem with Lee Johnson - good run, bad run, good run, bad run. Has happened for at least the last 4 seasons and happened at Barnsley. To expect different is futile. That is Lee Johnson.
 
The “f***ing set up and tactics” are no different to those we’ve used on both of our food runs this season.
Can't remember playing with 2 at the back in any of our good runs as you say.

Gooch , Neil , Doyle all bang out of form for weeks and he continues to play them.

Signs a RB but continues to play Winchester there.

The blokes clueless man
 
You do realise that this sentences sums up the problem with Lee Johnson - good run, bad run, good run, bad run. Has happened for at least the last 4 seasons and happened at Barnsley. To expect different is futile. That is Lee Johnson.

Aside from the very best teams in the country, every single club has good run, bad run, throughout a season. It’s what football is.
 
I do. I’m just of the opinion that the players are much more to blame for that performance. Not sure how anyone who watched the game could disagree to be honest.

Its always a bit of both but any manager who completely changes their defence round after a clean sheet is asking for criticism and problems the following game. Theres just no need. If it works keep it. If it doesnt then change it. The guy is an idiot who believes he is jose mourinho. This squad should be toe to toe with top of the league. Its easily good enough if managed right
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top