• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


You still can't prove that water is flat. You make an assertion and repeat it.
Think the problem is there is a discrepancy in what constitutes proof water is flat.

We are looking for accurate measurement

He is looking at a body of water and because it looks flat to the naked eye, that is sufficient proof for him as it backs up his beliefs
 
Yep, because what I say I have proof of and weirdly, so do you. You just refuse to accept it.

No you don't, you have badly-conceived failures of "experiments" that you've never even performed, a refusal by you to test your own theories with actual scientific unbiased experiments, a metric shitload of your own speculations based on psuedoscientific lies fed to you by the flat earth community, a massive deficiency in your knowledge and an utter inability to think for yourself.

Compound all that with your inability to ever admit when you're wrong and what you actually have isn't "proof" of anything other than your utter car crash of a belief system.

Yep, by the day my views become stronger.

Dementia will do that to a person.

Yep, it works every time because it's the truth.

Except it doesn't, because you've never measured it with equipment capable of detecting an 8 inches per mile squared curve in your bath.

Nope. They're your words, not mine.

"No true globe denier would ever admit the earth is a spinning globe".

Yet some of the world's leading globe deniers were caught on film admitting exactly that and then trying to cover up the results of their experiment that proved that globe denial is absolute bollocks.

So, were they telling the truth about being globe deniers and accidentally proving the world was a spinning globe, or are they actually just in on the conspiracy?

Nope. Experiments so simple that give rise to it.

You haven't done any experiments, you liar.

Yep, it's called my own hypothesis of which people like yourself are not privy to but think you are and you argue against it because it does not fit your global model that you also have no clue about other than to massively appeal to authority on the set up of it and claim you physically know.

What absolute bullshit.

Your cellworld is straight out of the book of Zetetic Astronomy by Samuel Rowbotham, the gobshite who founded the original flat earth society 150 years ago, i.e. a massive appeal to authority at best, utter plagiarism and lies about the true author at worst.

Yep, do some experiments for you. For you. Not for me. For you.

We all have. Real experiments. Unbiased experiments. Scientific experiments.

They all showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that the world is a spinning globe.
 
That's a mighty big sun reflection you got there.
Try something like this as an analogy.

Just replace the radar set up with a sun set up.
You must be logged on to see media items

How does the ‘sun’ appear to breach the horizon (at sunrise) and arc up and across the ‘sky’ using a radar similar to that if there is a central projector and also achieve this (sunrise) consistently for differing countries? It’s either low in the ‘sky’ or it’s higher and there’s either only one projection or there’s many. But none of these concepts all work in unison.
 
Last edited:
How does the ‘sun’ appear to breach the horizon (at sunrise) and arc up and across the ‘sky’ using a radar similar to that if there is a central projector and also achieve this (sunrise) consistently for differing countries? It’s either low in the ‘sky’ or it’s higher and there’s either only one projection or there’s many. But none of these concepts all work in unison.
At this time of year new zealand, south africa and Argentina all have daylight at the same time as the uk. Yet by 5pm it's dark here, but it's light in all those places, still light in new york though, and just getting light in LA. Some radar sun that.
Must be like a f***ing lamp the shapes it makes
 
At this time of year new zealand, south africa and Argentina all have daylight at the same time as the uk. Yet by 5pm it's dark here, but it's light in all those places, still light in new york though, and just getting light in LA. Some radar sun that.
Must be like a f***ing lamp the shapes it makes
Yeah but water's flat
 
Yeah but water's flat

That nails it. No further questions your honour
At this time of year new zealand, south africa and Argentina all have daylight at the same time as the uk. Yet by 5pm it's dark here, but it's light in all those places, still light in new york though, and just getting light in LA. Some radar sun that.
Must be like a f***ing lamp the shapes it makes
I missed out the word "lava".

Must be like a f***ing lava lamp the shapes it makes
 
It's presumably from the super carbon arc crystals at the centre of the earth reflecting off the dome to create super fluid lava that appears to pour out of so called volcanoes, but this is only an appeal to authority.

Or something.
Well it's in-your-face obvious that when you have all that super carbon arc heat in a place so cold that you cant go anywhere near enough to actually know it exists then you're going to get lava leaking out of Hawaii and The Canary Islands.
 
Does lava also find its level?
Atmospheric fluidity causes it to make thermoviscose shapes. In a container unhindered lava lamps will make phallic shapes. This is due to the lamp being shaped like my butt plug. In reality it's down to the liquid being more dense than the lava when under thermal compression inside the lamp which causes visual morphstortion. Plus if you look down at it you see it clearer rather than looking straight on like you would at your theoretical horizon.
 
How does the ‘sun’ appear to breach the horizon (at sunrise) and arc up and across the ‘sky’ using a radar similar to that if there is a central projector and also achieve this (sunrise) consistently for differing countries? It’s either low in the ‘sky’ or it’s higher and there’s either only one projection or there’s many. But none of these concepts all work in unison.
Refraction

I posted that then read the other responses. I’m really not trying am I?
 
Last edited:
I expect the light caused by this friction also has the appearance of lava.
It's also absolutely deafening. Light is friction. Friction is sound.
Is that why the Krakatoa eruption caused a sound wave that travelled in a way exactly consistent with Earth being a globe, but it's definitely not because reasons?

No. How do you know this happened? Have you any proof without an appeal to authority?
Schooled
 
Last edited:
It's also absolutely deafening. Light is friction. Friction is sound.


No. How do you know this happened? Have you any proof without an appeal to authority?
Schooled
How do you know I wasn't there? Time is a man made concept after all, and it's only because we've all been schooled into thinking it was too long ago for any of us to have been alive at the time that we have to appeal to the authority of historians.
 
Back
Top