RAWA MINUTES - Supporter collective meeting with club 30-11-21

[Steeeeed]

Minutes on RAWA site. Link below;

You must be logged on to see media items

or

You must be logged on to see external links

 

[Kingdom Bhoy]

DR said that if the Club shop is to remain operating in the way it is, then it is important the Club explain the strategic reasons for this as, at present, you cannot easily buy a Sunderland shirt in Sunderland.

Good point.

 

[samaistonsrightfoot]

Point blank refused to answer the ownership question despite making promises of clarity.

Wonder why.

 

[Sea to Shining Sea]

As expected. Not enough to address concerns for those who have them and probably enough for those to tell others it is.

And on we roll…

 

[Mowgli]

This will annoy some people no end. The club is tainted until they leave.

The worst people to ever be involved in our club.

 

[Steeeeed]

Point blank refused to answer the ownership question despite making promises of clarity.

Wonder why.

Presumably because KLD doesn't own 50% despite the wording that's consistently been used to suggest that he does.

 

[Gaz]

Is it me, or have they answered the question on JS & CM positions but pretty much ignored SD position

bit concerning, as is the £20 million comments

 

[samaistonsrightfoot]

Presumably because KLD doesn't own 50% despite the wording that's consistently been used to suggest that he does.

Starting to now look more likely.

Davison also confirms SD has not paid back the 20 million (yet).

 

[North Yorks Mackem]

Minutes on RAWA site. Link below;

You must be logged on to see media items

or

You must be logged on to see external links

Well thats a tad concerning that they won't disclose what percentage each party owns of the club. What constitutes a controlling stake of the club?

 

[samaistonsrightfoot]

Is it me, or have they answered the question on JS & CM positions but pretty much ignored SD position

Not really. They've said they don't have involvement in club business but have ignored both Satori and Methven being involved in club business with our head of recruitment so says nowt.

 

[Mowgli]

The club would do well to try and keep people onside at the moment like.

 

[North Yorks Mackem]

Presumably because KLD doesn't own 50% despite the wording that's consistently been used to suggest that he does.

This is starting to feel like when donald took over. Not necessarily outright lies, but just the support being intentionally misled. I'm fed up with it all tbh.

 

[samaistonsrightfoot]

Well thats a tad concerning that they won't disclose what percentage each party owns of the club. What constitutes a controlling stake of the club?

51%

 

[scott934]

At the end KLD says there is a non-disclosure agreement in place to stop the specific share percentages being announced, so how come the club are allowed to announce him as having a controlling stake?

 

[samaistonsrightfoot]

At the end KLD says there is a non-disclosure agreement in place to stop the specific share percentages being announced, so how come the club are allowed to announce him as having a controlling stake?

If there's a non disclosure in place it is because someone wants to hide something.

 

[Mowgli]

If there's a non disclosure in place it is because someone wants to hide something.

Imagine my shock.

 

[Gaz]

If there's a non disclosure in place it is because someone wants to hide something.

i think we can all guess who

 

[luvulongtime]

imo KLD has 51 and the weasels have 49 and this is embarrassing to him

 

[scott934]

If there's a non disclosure in place it is because someone wants to hide something.

Actually it does say confidentiality clauses, I misquoted it previously. I dunno if that is any different like.

 

[Steeeeed]

imo KLD has 51 and the weasels have 49 and this is embarrassing to him

Given the refusal to disclose and other things I've heard, I'm fairly confident he doesn't have 51%.