No really, I think it's pretty important to know who holds what power at the club as the article argues. The makeup of the board dictates all decisions going forward after all (just how much does Madrox own for example? I think it is and always will be a legitimate worry that they might not have the biggest shares individually - but could do collectively? Until we know conclusively that is not the case then people will always be worried.KLD owns the majority. Surely that's all that matters in reality? Just because a new plan hasn't worked perfectly from the off he's written that pile of shite.
Basically, recent results have taken a dive, so lets pull on and spin as many potential negatives, despite the many unknowns.
Whinging on because KLD spoke to Jim White, the same as Donald did man (he knows Jim White, although an arse, is one of the biggest journalists/reporters aye?)
It's just petty, misguided negativity imo, especially when concluded with this:
"The question has been put to the football club in recent weeks and, to their credit, they have confirmed the club’s aim is ‘to ensure supporters have full visibility and understanding of the ownership, the structure and how the club operates.’ An explanation of all of the above is now expected at the next Supporters’ Collective meeting, set for tomorrow night – Tuesday November 30th."
Making it all a non-issue anyway
Exactly.
there certainly are an awful lot of wrds for rellatively little substance
We're, by the article's own admission, finding out tomorrow. So why stir up a load of speculative shit beforehand?
Maybe in order to ensure it is actually mentioned in the meeting and trying to demonstrate why it is important it is answered?
the points he makes have been made on this board frequently.
Nobody listens to this board man
The club have obviously said that because they've already been asked
I do agree with this mind. If the hope is to find out more tomorrow, then I'd sit on the article. If the answers are forthcoming it renders it redundant. If they aren't then that's the time to release an article and ask why we aren't getting the information they promised. I do think it would be good to have some clarity on the ownership, on short term goals, long term goals, all of it. But let's give them the chance to address it through the right channel tomorrow and see where we're at then. The confirmation statement stuff is strange mind, I can imagine Madrox having people who miss things (GOM has flagged that up plenty of times) but the hope is that KLD and his people are a different animal. But again, he's a day or two early with this one
tbh i hadnt een realised that madro should have reflectedany change in their own statement..i just noted that davidson from the safc point of view would be resposible for changes at safc level.
should steve davidson not have had a handle on that? isnt he company secretary? also, if mercator is the controlling party, would the be in the confirmation statement.
