Nukehasslefan
Winger
Ahhh, I see.Of course not, it's intended for children of a much higher mental age.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahhh, I see.Of course not, it's intended for children of a much higher mental age.
Let's just imagine you are correct about everything: we have been mislead, the earth is flat etc etc. What difference would it make. Would I be able to do things I can't do now, what specifically would change?Aye I listened to it.
Still makes no logical sense.
But how come from South America I can see the sun from the central point through all of the dampening but say at "night" from somewhere really close like Greenland you should be able to see it still?Atmospheric mass stops you seeing too far, as it basically dampens reflection back to your eyes.
The higher up you are the farther you will see because you are looking through angled atmospheric mass rather than at sea level where you are looking much more horizontally.
It depends on what a person thinks and does.Let's just imagine you are correct about everything: we have been mislead, the earth is flat etc etc. What difference would it make. Would I be able to do things I can't do now, what specifically would change?
Where are you getting 20 miles from?But how come from South America I can see the sun from the central point through all of the dampening but say at "night" from somewhere really close like Greenland you should be able to see it still?
What even 20m, surely that can't make that much difference?
I never mentioned 20 miles.It depends on what a person thinks and does.
It's like the butterfly effect.
As it stands with us merely talking about it, it likely changes nothing more than you deciding to enter this thread to ask these questions.
If you found something in your life to be untrue would you change anything about your life in order to lessen that effect?
It's easy to say no but think about it.
The same can be said for anything.
If you are religious and now find Earth is not a spinning globe in a space vacuum, what does that make all those who said it was?
What does it do for religious belief systems?
What does it do for those who wish to explore?
What about those who adhered to space adventures.
It has to change minds and perceptions which will inevitably create that butterfly effect.
Where are you getting 20 miles from?
That's not even a passable attempt at inquiry. The question is answered in the post you're responding to.Which supposed planets are observed to be spinning globes?>
Seems rather logical to assume that Earth might be a spinning globe given that the two nearest planets are observable to be spinning globes even through consumer-grade telescopes.
Ahhh, I see.
It's like the butterfly effect.
Sorry but that's just woffle. You haven't identified a single tangible difference or benefit. If there's some sort of conspiracy to hid the truth there must be some tangible payoff. You do understand the difference between possibly and probability as assume?It depends on what a person thinks and does.
It's like the butterfly effect.
As it stands with us merely talking about it, it likely changes nothing more than you deciding to enter this thread to ask these questions.
If you found something in your life to be untrue would you change anything about your life in order to lessen that effect?
It's easy to say no but think about it.
The same can be said for anything.
If you are religious and now find Earth is not a spinning globe in a space vacuum, what does that make all those who said it was?
What does it do for religious belief systems?
What does it do for those who wish to explore?
What about those who adhered to space adventures.
It has to change minds and perceptions which will inevitably create that butterfly effect.
Where are you getting 20 miles from?
It depends on what a person thinks and does.
It's like the butterfly effect.
As it stands with us merely talking about it, it likely changes nothing more than you deciding to enter this thread to ask these questions.
If you found something in your life to be untrue would you change anything about your life in order to lessen that effect?
It's easy to say no but think about it.
The same can be said for anything.
If you are religious and now find Earth is not a spinning globe in a space vacuum, what does that make all those who said it was?
What does it do for religious belief systems?
What does it do for those who wish to explore?
What about those who adhered to space adventures.
It has to change minds and perceptions which will inevitably create that butterfly effect.
Where are you getting 20 miles from?
Interesting acknowledgement of Newton's laws of motion, hidden away in your post there.
Like I said, do the research and let me know. But I suspect my guess is closer to the truth than yours.So basically you have no clue.
Yes I can and did. The fact that you refuse to accept the existence of gravity might be a hinderance to you understanding, but it exists all the same.I do look it all up and the answers just seem like utter gobbledygook. Maybe they're not explaining simple enough. Can you offer an answer in simple terms bearing in mind I'm a retard and simpleton as I've been regularly told.
The simplest and easiest answer to my questions would help.
You see how in one sentence you're bleating on about being called a simpleton, then a few lines on and you're dissing anyone who believes in the globe like they are unable to check the facts of what they are told for themselves. It's not the fact that you don't follow the mindset that makes it unclear to you, it's either your inability or your unwillingness to understand.It's actually not clear at all. It is clear to anyone who follows peer pressure and bias for a global Earth and spin but I don;t follow that which makes it unclear to me.
And to repeat myself, I once was biased towards a spinning globe and I thought anything other was preposterous.
Why?
Because that's what I was schooled into, just like I was schooled into believing Santa and religion and the tooth fairy, plus the devil in hell...etc....etc....etc.
Yes, you can, but only if the dome is spherical.Of course you can.
That last bit is a key bit. We can demonstrate with a mechanical model exactly how the stars and planets will appear, They used them before computers. We can literally see it working to match the night sky. And on the other hand we have someone throwing around the words refraction and wavelength like they know what they mean.Like I said, do the research and let me know. But I suspect my guess is closer to the truth than yours.
Yes I can and did. The fact that you refuse to accept the existence of gravity might be a hinderance to you understanding, but it exists all the same.
I've seen you referred to as a retard twice now, and both times it was by you.
You see how in one sentence you're bleating on about being called a simpleton, then a few lines on and you're dissing anyone who believes in the globe like they are unable to check the facts of what they are told for themselves. It's not the fact that you don't follow the mindset that makes it unclear to you, it's either your inability or your unwillingness to understand.
As for my claim that you cant fit the entire known, accurately mapped, observable and verifiable sky onto the dome....
Yes, you can, but only if the dome is spherical.
Think of it like looking around your room, the ceiling, the floor and all four walls, everything around you, and then trying to project it all onto just the ceiling and two of the walls, while still appearing to look like the original room. It's not possible.
That is what you're claiming for the sky which you have clearly never studied in any depth. There are two hemispheres to the star map and they do match up around their circumferences and they do fit together to give the appearance of being inside a sphere of stars. Note that I said "give the appearance of" so don't be claiming I said it is a sphere. There is no possible way that any naturally occurring and thoroughly non-existent crystal projector has by pure chance come up with a system that manages to accurately fake the same appearance on an equally non-existent dome. You know this. If you believed in your theory you would have come up with an adequate illustration or explanation by now. If you were truly questioning and open minded you'd have studied the star map and seen sense.
for someone who distrusts science and scientists he sure tries to use their terms a lot in his mythical world explanations (word jumbles).That last bit is a key bit. We can demonstrate with a mechanical model exactly how the stars and planets will appear, They used them before computers. We can literally see it working to match the night sky. And on the other hand we have someone throwing around the words refraction and wavelength like they know what they mean.
Call me dumb but am confused (again) with day/night on this dome thingy
On our reality we know the sun falls over the horizon etc and it become darks yes
On planet Dome how does this happen
What stops us from seeing the Sun from a distance if it is essentially always above us?
And does the sun go from
Right to Left then Left to Right or what
Our Sun revolves around the earth etc but wtf goes on on Dome world
think I’ve lost it chaps
Lighthouse?I never mentioned 20 miles.
The 20m was in reply to your lighthouse rubbish
Well I still want to know how they're spinning globes. Show me some pictures/video of them being spinning globes.That's not even a passable attempt at inquiry. The question is answered in the post you're responding to.
You still haven't acknowledged this post. I know there's no pictures but it answers all your previous questions.
Put a flat earthier into space
There's one law of motion.Interesting acknowledgement of Newton's laws of motion, hidden away in your post there.
You asked a question and I answered it.Sorry but that's just woffle. You haven't identified a single tangible difference or benefit. If there's some sort of conspiracy to hid the truth there must be some tangible payoff. You do understand the difference between possibly and probability as assume?
Millions and millions of people believe in it. Are they being lied to or are they all in on the lie?Means fuck all to religion as they believe in something even more daft than you do.
Only because that's what you are shown.As for my claim that you cant fit the entire known, accurately mapped, observable and verifiable sky onto the dome....
Yes, you can, but only if the dome is spherical.
Think of it like looking around your room, the ceiling, the floor and all four walls, everything around you, and then trying to project it all onto just the ceiling and two of the walls, while still appearing to look like the original room. It's not possible.
Correct I haven't studied the points of light in depth. I don't need to.That is what you're claiming for the sky which you have clearly never studied in any depth.
There are two hemispheres to the star map and they do match up around their circumferences and they do fit together to give the appearance of being inside a sphere of stars.
You basically are saying it is.Note that I said "give the appearance of" so don't be claiming I said it is a sphere.
There is no possible way that any naturally occurring and thoroughly non-existent crystal projector has by pure chance come up with a system that manages to accurately fake the same appearance on an equally non-existent dome.
You know this. If you believed in your theory you would have come up with an adequate illustration or explanation by now.
I've seen enough of it to understand it's moving round a dome.If you were truly questioning and open minded you'd have studied the star map and seen sense.
I have answered it and I said it makes no sense.
There's one law of motion.
For every action there's and equal and opposite reaction. That's basically it. It applies to everything.
You only get out of something what you put in.
Or realise he has finally accepted the basis of spaceflight, which has argued against for so longFrom here, an inquisitive mind might research the other two.
You didn't, you ignored it.
WRONG
That's one of them. Congratulations, you do know SOMETHING. That's actually Newton's THIRD law of motion.
From here, an inquisitive mind might research the other two.
Or realise he has finally accepted the basis of spaceflight, which has argued against for so long
Yeah he will either deny saying it, ignore any reference to having said it or caveat it IE effectively deny having said it.As soon as you think you’ve turned a corner and there’s a glimmer of hope the penny will drop, he returns to type and flatly denies everything (pun intended).
No need to research. I know what the supposed laws are but there is only one.That's one of them. Congratulations, you do know SOMETHING. That's actually Newton's THIRD law of motion.
From here, an inquisitive mind might research the other two.
Not in the way we are told, I won't be....ever.Or realise he has finally accepted the basis of spaceflight, which has argued against for so long
In the space they tell us about....it's not possible.Yeah he will either deny saying it, ignore any reference to having said it or caveat it IE effectively deny having said it.
Otherwise he has to accept spaceflight is possible