Put a flat earthier into space

[The Snockerty Friddle]

If you had a clock on the wall and a mirror behind you does the clock move in the same direction?

Aha, you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9.

 

[payne]

Isn't it mad how gravity is used to prove that gravity doesn't exist. I actually think that's their best argument also.

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

There is no opposite pole.

No you don't. Just another part of it to view.

Understand you're viewing a time lapse.

Yes there is. You can take the same time lapse picture facing south in the southern hemisphere.
Another part of it to view, yes, the opposite hemisphere.
Of course I understand it's a time lapse, that's how it proves either Earth or the stars are moving.
One needs a ridiculously unlikely explanation with countless idiotic bits of stupidity bolted on in order to get anywhere near to working (and it still fails).
The other is a rotating globe.

 

[Nobby]

TBF his arguments fall apart quicker than Mag managerial appointments

 

[payne]

TBF his arguments fall apart quicker than Mag managerial appointments

which arguments?

He only debates things worth debating. He believes in science as science is the earth but not 93 million mile vacuum rotating space globes

 

[What A Waster]

Isn't it mad how gravity is used to prove that gravity doesn't exist. I actually think that's their best argument also.

Exactly this. More dense things are heavier because of gravity. They do not cause gravity.

 

[payne]

Exactly this. More dense things are heavier because of gravity. They do not cause gravity.

Why couldn't they stack onto the ice dome itself as that could be the bottom if there's no up or down?

 

[BigPete]

Isn't it mad how gravity is used to prove that gravity doesn't exist. I actually think that's their best argument also.

Not gravity it's the atmospheric stack

 

[payne]

Not gravity it's the atmospheric stack

is it out like that thing over Seaburn?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But why on your map would it go from clockwise at the top to no movement in the middle and anticlockwise at the bottom if your lemon squeezer is solid
No idea where a mirror comes into it

It wouldn't be at the top and the bottom. It would be around the circle.
The mirroring comes with opposite pendulums set ups on each opposite area of the circle.

 

[Nobby]

Why couldn't they stack onto the ice dome itself as that could be the bottom if there's no up or down?

Because they add matter to the molecule

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Aha, you know what a clock looks like! Imagine your central projector is displaying a sort of a clock face onto the dome.
12 is directly overhead, with 9 and 3 opposite each other at the base of the dome.
Draw a diagram to explain how someone in UK sees 9,10,11,12,1,2 and 3 while someone in Australia sees 3,4,5,6,7,8 and 9.

It doesn't Work like that.

 

[payne]

Because they add matter to the molecule

Is that part of an Eminem lyric?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

It doesn't Work like that.

It does. Look at a star chart. Look at the sky.
Coming up with different explanations for what happens is one thing, but denying what is clearly visible and easily proven is something else.

 

[Nobby]

Is that part of an Eminem lyric?

Unfortunately not, it was part of his explanation yesterday of his pressure density shit. He never did explain the chemistry behind adding matter to a molecule

It does. Look at a star chart. Look at the sky.
Coming up with different explanations for what happens is one thing, but denying what is clearly visible and easily proven is something else.

How can there be a star chart, there are no stars

Proven how?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Unfortunately not, it was part of his explanation yesterday of his pressure density shit. He never did explain the chemistry behind adding matter to a molecule


How can there be a star chart, there are no stars

Proven how?

Depends on how you look at it.
Stuff and things.

 

[payne]

Unfortunately not, it was part of his explanation yesterday of his pressure density shit. He never did explain the chemistry behind adding matter to a molecule


How can there be a star chart, there are no stars

Proven how?

I wish I'd been told the truth about the world when I was a kid. Wouldn't have wasted by time watching documentaries and stuff and instead just read fiction.

 

[Nobby]

I wish I'd been told the truth about the world when I was a kid. Wouldn't have wasted by time watching documentaries and stuff and instead just read fiction.

Yeah my A level physics would have been a piece of piss

Q1 - show the mathematical proof of Bernoulli's equation

A - what do you mean by proof. There is no such thing as pressure changes you prove there is.

Q2 Describe how Newton's 3rd law can be demonstrated by space flight

A - there is no such space vacuum and no so called space flight in the space vacuum

 

[payne]

Yeah my A level physics would have been a piece of piss

Q1 - show the mathematical proof of Bernoulli's equation

A - what do you mean by proof. There is no such thing as pressure changes you prove there is.

Q2 Describe how Newton's 3rd law can be demonstrated by space flight

A - there is no such space vacuum and no so called space flight in the space vacuum

You may have been schooled to pass a fake test.

 

[Nobby]

You may have been schooled to pass a fake test.

The test was real, but now I realise the subject matter was a big lie.

Bet the teachers used to piss themselves watching us stress over learning the lies they were knowingly peddling