Put a flat earthier into space

[Nukehasslefan]

Why opposite directions at our 2 poles though and why no movement at any point on the equator?

Like I said it depends on the set up.

Even in a sealed building which omits atmospheric pressure it still happens

It doesn't omit atmospheric pressure. It's all around us, above us whether in or out of buildings.

We really need the sketch you promised though.
Then we may understand the utter nonsense you post daily.

A sketch is not going to appease you or other like you but I will do one. Just don;t expect anything special.

 

[payne]

Like I said it depends on the set up.

It doesn't omit atmospheric pressure. It's all around us, above us whether in or out of buildings.


A sketch is not going to appease you or other like you but I will do one. Just don;t expect anything special.

Like what model projector is used, Kodak or summit?

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

See what?
A point of light?
I agree but what's this supposed to prove?

Points of light if they show up.

Many points of light, all over the sky.
All appearing to move.
All appearing to move in a circle.
All appearing to move in a circle around Polaris.
All at different speeds.

Logon or register to see this image

At every point along that triangle, the nearby star trail fits inside the triangle.
Rather than all the deflection and nonsense, try to explain that.
It's really easy, it comes down to one of two things.
Either all of those points of light can communicate with each other and arrange themselves in a given order for ANY Earthbound observer SIMULTANEOUSLY, for no apparent reason, or it's Earth that rotates.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Like what model projector is used, Kodak or summit?

In the buildings? I don't know. It depends on who makes projectors for the places that use them.

Many points of light, all over the sky.
All appearing to move.
All appearing to move in a circle.
All appearing to move in a circle around Polaris.
All at different speeds.

Logon or register to see this image

At every point along that triangle, the nearby star trail fits inside the triangle.

Just like on a roundabout or if you prefer to look at it from this point of view, a catherine wheel.

Rather than all the deflection and nonsense, try to explain that.

Any good?

It's really easy, it comes down to one of two things.
Either all of those points of light can communicate with each other and arrange themselves in a given order for ANY Earthbound observer SIMULTANEOUSLY, for no apparent reason, or it's Earth that rotates.

Or number 3. They're merely a projection onto the dome and are dictated by that projection.

 

[payne]

In the buildings? I don't know. It depends on who makes projectors for the places that use them.

Just like on a roundabout or if you prefer to look at it from this point of view, a catherine wheel.

Any good?

Or number 3. They're merely a projection onto the dome and are dictated by that projection.

mint

 

[The Snockerty Friddle]

Just like on a roundabout or if you prefer to look at it from this point of view, a catherine wheel.

Any good?

Or number 3. They're merely a projection onto the dome and are dictated by that projection.

No, not any good at all.
Projection on a dome does not produce what can clearly be seen. There would need to be a second catherine wheel at the opposite pole for one thing.
If you accept that these points of light are projected on a dome, you need a second dome for the rest.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

No, not any good at all.
Projection on a dome does not produce what can clearly be seen. There would need to be a second catherine wheel at the opposite pole for one thing.

There is no opposite pole.

If you accept that these points of light are projected on a dome, you need a second dome for the rest.

No you don't. Just another part of it to view.

Understand you're viewing a time lapse.

 

[Nobby]

No, not any good at all.
Projection on a dome does not produce what can clearly be seen. There would need to be a second catherine wheel at the opposite pole for one thing.
If you accept that these points of light are projected on a dome, you need a second dome for the rest.

There is no opposite pole don't forget

There is no opposite pole don't forget

He he I got it word for word

 

[payne]

No, not any good at all.
Projection on a dome does not produce what can clearly be seen. There would need to be a second catherine wheel at the opposite pole for one thing.
If you accept that these points of light are projected on a dome, you need a second dome for the rest.

You can't reason with someone of such low reasoning powers. He's invented a magical place where only he lives and he's the king. All his subjects are morons walking about living a lie either known or not. At this point it's obvious that the likes of Dave H is just some actor or a blatant idiot.

 

[taipeisafc]

It can be stopped by dense mass stopping the reflection.

It doesn't have motion. It is instant.


Because the waves and angles change direction of the reflection.
You can reflect light from hitting a point by putting a barrier in the way and deflecting it as you are showing. You don't stop the light you simply reflect it or deflect it/refract it.
It's instant. No speed.


Frequency is the result of how vibrations/friction is forced through energy.
The frequency is merely the amount of energy put into something under less to more pressure upon any medium/material.

It can only be stopped when the energy source stops that makes it and the stopping of that energy instantly stops the light.

I know what we're told but that's just to keep the utter bull alive, in my opinion.
To make believe stars and such still shine light from millions of years ago.
Light is instant.

Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.

It can be stopped by dense mass stopping the reflection.

It doesn't have motion. It is instant.


Because the waves and angles change direction of the reflection.
You can reflect light from hitting a point by putting a barrier in the way and deflecting it as you are showing. You don't stop the light you simply reflect it or deflect it/refract it.
It's instant. No speed.


Frequency is the result of how vibrations/friction is forced through energy.
The frequency is merely the amount of energy put into something under less to more pressure upon any medium/material.

It can only be stopped when the energy source stops that makes it and the stopping of that energy instantly stops the light.

I know what we're told but that's just to keep the utter bull alive, in my opinion.
To make believe stars and such still shine light from millions of years ago.
Light is instant.

Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.

 

[payne]

Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.


Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.

why?

can you explain in detail so he can give a couple word reply?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You can't reason with someone of such low reasoning powers. He's invented a magical place where only he lives and he's the king. All his subjects are morons walking about living a lie either known or not. At this point it's obvious that the likes of Dave H is just some actor or a blatant idiot.

Nice story but that's all it is.

Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.


Bloody hell a new level of wrongness.

Of course. To you and others who don't think this way, how can it be any other?

why?

can you explain in detail so he can give a couple word reply?

Already done but thanks all the same.

 

[What A Waster]

No because you would need to weigh yourself and would need a scale in which to do that. You displace whatever dense atmosphere you are in and so would a scale.
Plus you're trying to correlate atmosphere with water pressure

But if atmospheric pressure causes gravity then going 30 cubic metres deeper adds in 36kg more pressure.
The only displacement is me, so maybe me and the scale are about 2 or 3 cubic metres, i dunno I've never calculated the volume of my body.
Even if it was 4 cubic metres, there's still 30kg of extra atmospheric pressure in that hole

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But if atmospheric pressure causes gravity then going 30 cubic metres deeper adds in 36kg more pressure.

How are you arriving at this?

The only displacement is me

Correct.

, so maybe me and the scale are about 2 or 3 cubic metres, i dunno I've never calculated the volume of my body.

If you displace atmosphere it has to go somewhere. Where can it go?
I'll make this easier.
If you displace water in a swimming pool, where does that water go you've just displaced?

Even if it was 4 cubic metres, there's still 30kg of extra atmospheric pressure in that hole

No.
Back to water.
If you dig a hole and allow water into that hole you've transferred the mass you dug out into the water and the water into the hole.
What's changed?

 

[legend7]

Like I said it depends on the set up.

It doesn't omit atmospheric pressure. It's all around us, above us whether in or out of buildings.


A sketch is not going to appease you or other like you but I will do one. Just don;t expect anything special.

Explain what set up would cause opposite rotations in different countries but identical along a line?
I could understand your pressure causing movement maybe left or right or up or down but how rotation?
And if you move it 50 foot the same rotation.
Are you saying there are millions of spirals of pressure that suddenly change direction when you cross a line on a map?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Explain what set up would cause opposite rotations in different countries but identical along a line?

If you had a clock on the wall and a mirror behind you does the clock move in the same direction?

I could understand your pressure causing movement maybe left or right or up or down but how rotation?

Vortex of Earth.
Can you not remember me mentioning it and using a sink and plug hole as an analogy with things moving around towards the plug hole and getting a stronger push the closer it gets and weaker the farther it gets?
Just transfer that to atmosphere and the central Earth energy and vortex created.

And if you move it 50 foot the same rotation.
Are you saying there are millions of spirals of pressure that suddenly change direction when you cross a line on a map?

There will be changes, yes.
But in this case it's appearance on a circle not on a globe.

 

[legend7]

If you had a clock on the wall and a mirror behind you does the clock move in the same direction?

Vortex of Earth.
Can you not remember me mentioning it and using a sink and plug hole as an analogy with things moving around towards the plug hole and getting a stronger push the closer it gets and weaker the farther it gets?
Just transfer that to atmosphere and the central Earth energy and vortex created.

There will be changes, yes.
But in this case it's appearance on a circle not on a globe.

But why on your map would it go from clockwise at the top to no movement in the middle and anticlockwise at the bottom if your lemon squeezer is solid
No idea where a mirror comes into it

 

[Bobthebasted]

How are you arriving at this?

Looks a bit like Newton law of physics to me. How dare he use a conman maths.

 

[What A Waster]

How are you arriving at this?

Correct.

If you displace atmosphere it has to go somewhere. Where can it go?
I'll make this easier.
If you displace water in a swimming pool, where does that water go you've just displaced?

No.
Back to water.
If you dig a hole and allow water into that hole you've transferred the mass you dug out into the water and the water into the hole.
What's changed?

The fact is , it's not atmospheric pressure causing gravity. You've just been fooled into thinking it after being radicalized by the flat earth idiots.

 

[Nobby]

The fact is , it's not atmospheric pressure causing gravity. You've just been fooled into thinking it after being told a narrative by an authority you accept

Tidied