• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nukehasslefan said:
It doesn't work because that's not what's happening on my map.
If it's pictures on the tiny scale it's naturally going to look like people think it looks.





Can you remember me saying 2 Earth shapes are basically my thoughts.
Remember?
That's the very reason I said it because it gives a better set up if you're looking at it from a gradual gradient point of view and not a tiny orange squeezer type set up.


If you're stood at the shore does your Earth look like a small ball in the pictures you see?
Obviously not, so why would you even think you could picture a orange squeezer type Earth?

If you want to continue looking at it the way you think then you carry on.
Click to expand...
We are all going off the map you put up saying earth isn't flat it's like this.
Regardless of how big the map is it has a very defined raised centre way above the lowest level
 

Nukehasslefan said:
It'll depend on the decline from land.
Click to expand...

Yeah but it's about 9000 miles difference from the top of the orange squeezer/north pole/crystal palace/arctic ocean to the southern ocean. Any land rising in the south like Tasmania or Argentina for example will have to be surrounded by deeper seas than somewhere like Greenland. Otherwise they will be submerged
 
legend7 said:
We are all going off the map you put up saying earth isn't flat it's like this.
Regardless of how big the map is it has a very defined raised centre way above the lowest level
Click to expand...
Your globe has very defined raised convex curvature but you argue for it being hardly noticeable.
What A Waster said:
Yeah but it's about 9000 miles difference from the top of the orange squeezer/north pole/crystal palace/arctic ocean to the southern ocean. Any land rising in the south like Tasmania or Argentina for example will have to be surrounded by deeper seas than somewhere like Greenland. Otherwise they will be submerged
Click to expand...
Not sure how you work that one out.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It depends on what you put up against the atmosphere in terms of dense mass.
This is why things weigh on a scale plate. The scale is a spring foundation which measures the dense mass displacement of atmosphere of any object placed upon that scale.
No gravity involved, at all.

Ok then, How about you measure the fall per mile squared on your global/oblate spheroid model.

How come what?


I could very well be replacing it with absolute fiction. I don't know the absolute truth of what Earth is and to say I do would be an outright lie.
But then again I don't offer it out as factual.
What I do know is, Earth is absolutely not a spinning globe in a space vacuum.

Anything I provide is from my own deduction. It's not there to be defended, it's told to those who are asking about it.
Click to expand...

No it won't pressure acts on a surface area (force per unit area) you state that gravity doesn't exist and everything is caused by pressure - including tides so I am going to ask again what fluctuations in pressure should I be looking for to affect the tides and ensure everything stays on the floor? Another question what weighs more on your scale plate 1 m3 of gold in a 1mx1mx1m cube or 1m3 of gold drawn out into a huge flat plate 1 cm thick?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Your globe has very defined raised convex curvature but you argue for it being hardly noticeable.

Not sure how you work that one out.
Click to expand...
But if you're saying it follows the orange squeezer map but land masses just raise up through the water so they aren't submerged then I take it you mean a section like this?

You must be logged on to see external links
 
babyimreadytoblow said:
This is just concerning tbh.

I'm going to go out on a limb and say its ALMOST bullying.

For want of a better way to describe it.

This thread should really be closed now.

It's either a windup or serious mental issues and either way enough is enough.
Click to expand...
No, having read the blokes opinions on this and other matters (see Coronavirus forum) and his previous musings on CT's, it's clear - to me at least - he's a full blown denier of just about everything and lives in a world of his own. Let him ramble.
 
taipeisafc said:
No it won't pressure acts on a surface area (force per unit area) you state that gravity doesn't exist and everything is caused by pressure - including tides so I am going to ask again what fluctuations in pressure should I be looking for to affect the tides and ensure everything stays on the floor?
Click to expand...
The pressure is all over the oceans and the oceans are resisting that pressure and pressure change causing tides.
Your barometer will show fluctuations.


taipeisafc said:
Another question what weighs more on your scale plate 1 m3 of gold in a 1mx1mx1m cube or 1m3 of gold drawn out into a huge flat plate 1 cm thick?
Click to expand...
Both the same because both displace exactly the same amount of atmospheric.
legend7 said:
But if you're saying it follows the orange squeezer map but land masses just raise up through the water so they aren't submerged then I take it you mean a section like this?

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Yep.
 
Last edited:
legend7 said:
So if you drew that as a 3d map it would be flat nothing like an orange squeezer shape with a raised centre ?
Water at 1 level with land popping through.
Click to expand...
I've repeatedly said the water is flat.
I've repeatedly said the solid Earth is like an orange squeezer.
What is it you can't get?
legend7 said:
The issue being the deepest ocean is just over 6 miles using your shape they would be hundreds or thousands of miles deep
Click to expand...
No they wouldn't be thousands of miles deep. I'm not sure how you work that out unless you're using your spinning globe model as your yardstick, which, if you are, then you're never going to get it.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
I've repeatedly said the water is flat.
I've repeatedly said the solid Earth is like an orange squeezer.
What is it you can't get?
Click to expand...
When I posted a map of a flat earth you said no definitely not it's raised in the centre like this 3d map.
What you're now saying is that it won't look like that at all and has seas as deep as some countries are wide.
Nukehasslefan said:
I've repeatedly said the water is flat.
I've repeatedly said the solid Earth is like an orange squeezer.
What is it you can't get?

No they wouldn't be thousands of miles deep. I'm not sure how you work that out unless you're using your spinning globe model as your yardstick, which, if you are, then you're never going to get it.
Click to expand...
If they weren't that deep it can't be orange squeezer shape its basically flat 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
 
Last edited:
legend7 said:
When I posted a map of a flat earth you said no definitely not it's raised in the centre like this 3d map.
What you're now saying is that it won't look like that at all and has seas as deep as some countries are wide.
Click to expand...
The best thing for you to do is to get what I'm saying and you won't need to go down this route.

No offence but this'll just go around in circles. Pardon the pun.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I've repeatedly said the water is flat.
I've repeatedly said the solid Earth is like an orange squeezer.
What is it you can't get?

No they wouldn't be thousands of miles deep. I'm not sure how you work that out unless you're using your spinning globe model as your yardstick, which, if you are, then you're never going to get it.
Click to expand...

Because it's a distance of about 9000 miles. So on your world with the solid earth on a lemon squeezer shaped gradient, and the surface of the water being level the further south you go the deeper its going to get
 
legend7 said:
When I posted a map of a flat earth you said no definitely not it's raised in the centre like this 3d map.
What you're now saying is that it won't look like that at all and has seas as deep as some countries are wide.

If they weren't that deep it can't be orange squeezer shape its basically flat 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...
The water is flat and level, not the Earth.
What A Waster said:
Because it's a distance of about 9000 miles. So on your world with the solid earth on a lemon squeezer shaped gradient, and the surface of the water being level the further south you go the deeper its going to get
Click to expand...
What is a distance of about 9000 miles?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
The water is flat and level, not the Earth.

What is a distance of about 9000 miles?
Click to expand...

Sorry should've been more specific. From Alaska to the southernmost point of South America. All one land mass as well so the ses surrounding them will be considerably deeper in the south than in the north.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top