• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

If there's no air there's no working rockets or missiles, unless they launch by catapult for a short period.
As for gravity. Nobody knows what it is and for good reason. It doesn't exist but it's made to exist in the storyline because Earth spin in a vacuum with stars and planets and what not, would not be a thing and that would destroy the whole charade.
Most rockets and missiles aren't air breathing.
 

Close but no cigar. Newton's third law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, no need for a medium.A rocket pushes gases from inside it in one direction, and this pushes the rocket in the opposite direction.
 
No I haven't.
Every time people have asked for proof I've simply said water level. Nothing to do with a bath experiment.


I don't agree because it's not provable for a spinning globe.

Water level.
The simplest and easily provable truth that we do not walk upon a spinning globe.
I know I know. You don't accept it because you think water can stay on a spinning globe due to magical gravity that nobody has a clue about other than to mention that all mass supposedly attracts mass.
It makes no sense but it's the mainstream story so it doesn't have to. Try and say water is flat and level and you get a dunces cap. Say it's curved and can stay on a ball with big oceans doing what we see them doing and all is sensible and hunk dory.

It's amazing what mass indoctrination can do to us all.

It doesn't. It's not in a zero gravity atmosphere. It's in atmosphere. Gravity is made up nonsense so even saying zero gravity is just adding to it because it implies things float.
Absolute madness but a clever ruse.
And how do you tell if water is level?
 
If there's no air there's no working rockets or missiles, unless they launch by catapult for a short period.
As for gravity. Nobody knows what it is and for good reason. It doesn't exist but it's made to exist in the storyline because Earth spin in a vacuum with stars and planets and what not, would not be a thing and that would destroy the whole charade.
Rockets are not aerodynamic other than minimising surface area to reach escape velocity from gravity.

The earth could not be this weird disc without gravity. The earth and other planets are spheres because gravity.

I'm absolutely baffled you don't think any of this is true.

Let me pose you a question. You ascend the eiffel tower. You then jump off. What force is it that will accelerate you to your inevitable death?
 
Rockets are not aerodynamic other than minimising surface area to reach escape velocity from gravity.

The earth could not be this weird disc without gravity. The earth and other planets are spheres because gravity.

I'm absolutely baffled you don't think any of this is true.

Let me pose you a question. You ascend the eiffel tower. You then jump off. What force is it that will accelerate you to your inevitable death?

no gravity, no sphere, no space or planets. dense air!
NASA at it again with their narrative

 
Last edited:
Every time people have asked for proof I've simply said water level. Nothing to do with a bath experiment.

Water level.
The simplest and easily provable truth that we do not walk upon a spinning globe.
It is an answer and I know many people that's proven water to be level and flat.

Sorry if you've already responded to this request, but could you give a link or directions to other experiments that have been carried out that prove the earths flatness?
Go and do it yourself. Water level.
Go and try it anywhere you like.
Use whatever you like as a container and even unbalance it and watch teh water level up.
You know this but you choose to believe it conforms to a globe because that's the narrative set out in mainstream. Simple as that really.
I may just do that, but in the meantime can you direct me to anything where anyone has done this - using water I mean.
Do it for you not for anyone else. You can look for whatever you want. You do not need me to hold your hand.
I’m simply asking for your help.
Can you direct me to any of these experiments?
Nukehasslefan, as water being flat is central to your argument, I’ll ask again, for the 5th!, time: Do you have any information on third parties attempting to confirm this?
Anyone can confirm it.
That’s not an answer.

Do you have any information?
It is an answer and I know many people that's proven water to be level and flat.
You know it is and so does everyone else on here....etc.
The major issue is in going with the water curves mindset because you're basically told to do so.

You've basically been told to abandon your own logical senses in favour of utter gunk.
I was in exactly that same set up a few decades ago.

It wasn’t an answer it was a response.
Can you direct me to any information where third parties have attempted to confirm that water is flat?
You'll need to do that yourself if you really want to know.
Personally you can prove it to yourself but I have a feeling that seems to be a no option for you, so basically just stick to your globe and curved water. It's easier.
Is there a sentence missing here,
‘and leave me alone’?

It’s a simple question, for the 7th!!, time since Friday, do you have any information on third parties carrying out experiments on how level water is?

A simple yes or no would suffice.
Hooray!!!

Are you prepared to share it with us?
No need. You can prove this to yourself.
You can prove a lot of stuff to yourself that goes against the global Earth/space shenanigans but it is all down to you. I can't help. It has to be you.

And all that took 3 days!

A subject central to his argument, that is constantly in contention, it is a 'simplest and easily provable truth' and he knows 'many people that's proven water to be level and flat' but thinks there is 'no need' to direct anyone to this proof.

I think it speaks volumes for his claims.

In the words of the man himself:

'In my opinion of course'
 
And all that took 3 days!

A subject central to his argument, that is constantly in contention, it is a 'simplest and easily provable truth' and he knows 'many people that's proven water to be level and flat' but thinks there is 'no need' to direct anyone to this proof.

I think it speaks volumes for his claims.

In the words of the man himself:

'In my opinion of course'
opinion is just as valid as fact to the genius
 
@Nukehasslefan if there's nowt in space, how does sat nav, sattelite tv broadcast etc work? I often watch sattelites moving in the sky in my garden. If they're not real what is with the dishes on our houses or calling it sattelite navigation?
 
@Nukehasslefan if there's nowt in space, how does sat nav, sattelite tv broadcast etc work? I often watch sattelites moving in the sky in my garden. If they're not real what is with the dishes on our houses or calling it sattelite navigation?
They are just there to make you buy into the lie. It's really from arcing super carbon air density pressure energy force squared per mile in the bath lemon squeezer gradient containers on the level


Christ I've finally got it. It's the masons it's"on the level"
 
Last edited:
Close but no cigar. Newton's third law, every action has an equal and opposite reaction, no need for a medium.A rocket pushes gases from inside it in one direction, and this pushes the rocket in the opposite direction.
Pushes gases from inside in one direction?
A rocket simply burns its fuel and does so by fuel being pushed one way from inside to push against atmosphere at the external and off your rocket goes.
A simple as that.
And how do you tell if water is level?
I can't help you if you don't know the answer to that.
Rockets are not aerodynamic other than minimising surface area to reach escape velocity from gravity.
Escape velocity from where?
Rockets are aerodynamic. They have to be or they simply do not balance.
I'm absolutely baffled you don't think any of this is true.
You're baffled because you go with rthe flow of mainstream. I once did until I questioned it, so It's hardly surprising.
Let me pose you a question. You ascend the eiffel tower. You then jump off. What force is it that will accelerate you to your inevitable death?
My dense mass against atmospheric pressure.
My dense mass is already displacing it's own amount of atmosphere. Every bit of atmosphere I'm within I'm displacing.
That displaced atmosphere has to go somewhere. It is added pressure back onto me, just like if I was in a swimming pool, I'd be displacing the water in that and that water I displaced would still be in that swimming pool, only the swimming pool would have a slight water raise or a pressure raise back onto me by my extra dense mass displacement of it, as well as the water already in the pool.

In atmosphere it's similar except atmosphere is more what you can call, springy, meaning we compress it more easily than water and that compression reacts to our displacement of that atmosphere.

We are basically crushed back down as we ascend into atmosphere. Our dense mass is always acted upon above as well as below and all around.
No gravity needed.
 
Last edited:
Pushes gases from inside in one direction?
A rocket simply burns its fuel and does so by fuel being pushed one way from inside to push against atmosphere at the external and off your rocket goes.
A simple as that.

I can't help you if you don't know the answer to that.

Escape velocity from where?
Rockets are aerodynamic. They have to be or they simply do not balance.

You're baffled because you go with rthe flow of mainstream. I once did until I questioned it, so It's hardly surprising.

My dense mass against atmospheric pressure.
My dense mass is already displacing it's own amount of atmosphere. Every bit of atmosphere I'm within I'm displacing.
That displaced atmosphere has to go somewhere. It is added pressure back onto me, just like if I was in a swimming pool, I'd be displacing the water in that and that water I displaced would still be in that swimming pool, only the swimming pool would have a slight water raise or a pressure raise back onto me by my extra dense mass displacement of it, as well as the water already in the pool.

In atmosphere it's similar except atmosphere is more what you can call, springy, meaning we compress it more easily than water and that compression reacts to our displacement of that atmosphere.

We are basically crushed back down as we ascend into atmosphere. Our dense mass is always acted upon above as well as below and all around.
No gravity needed.

Your theory brings then into question.... How do boats work. And why do aeroplanes need wings. Your logic has more holes than the polo factory man
 
@Nukehasslefan if there's nowt in space, how does sat nav, sattelite tv broadcast etc work? I often watch sattelites moving in the sky in my garden. If they're not real what is with the dishes on our houses or calling it sattelite navigation?
There could be all kinds of stuff up in the sky but it's not in space.
The space we're told about is fiction as far as I'm concerned.

I would have no qualms about there being man made objects placed into higher altitude but it would be something like helium/hydrogen filled to sit in that environment.

As for orbiting a spinning ball in space. Not a chance in hell as far as I'm concerned.
Also how often have you changed your so called satellite dish?
Can i ask for an explanation as to what is ‘ a reflection from Earths central energy ‘ ?!?
Basically what you see the reflection of in the sky. The sun.
Your theory brings then into question.... How do boats work. And why do aeroplanes need wings. Your logic has more holes than the polo factory man
It doesn't bring anything into question. They all use atmosphere to work.
A boat uses a propeller against water and atmosphere to balance in that water, called displacement of it. It also uses atmosphere to allow the engine to breathe in order for it to move propellers through that water to push that water away from it to push that boat in the opposite direction.

A plane uses engines or propellers to push air behind it to create a reaction or a crashing of air to push it forward.
The wings cut through the air its pushing through which creates a higher pressure below them than above them and the plane skims that higher pressure as long as it keeps that skimming up.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top