• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

ALL NUFC and Sportwashing stuff in here. (Threads will be merged)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Luna17 said:
Mate, I detest the mags as much as you, but let's not kid ourselves, FMA was a bad owner. Ok, he kept a tight ship unlike daft arses like Short and Morris, but haway man, all he wanted was prem survival. Wasn't bothered about the cups, just wanted the sky PL money every season. We'd have hated him just as much as the mags.
As for him as a human being, that expose about his main factory in Derbyshire tells u all u need to know. And his zero hours contracts and ....etc etc.
If he was lying in the roadside on fire, I wudnt piss on the tosser.

And don't get me started on the SA scumbag...
Click to expand...
stewart or ashley i know who id rather have had
 
Decent article here - strongly implies that the mags have already been completely brainwashed

You must be logged on to see external links

Those trying to argue the difference between the sovereign wealth fund and the government will not have been helped by a small, but very vocal, group of Saudi men outside St James' Park, who went around holding a Saudi flag and pictures of the crown prince and King Salman.

It appears they did not get the memo that the Saudi takeover supposedly had nothing to do with the government or royal family.

Saudi journalist Ibrahim al-Frayan was the most prominent member of the Saudi contingent outside the stadium. Newcastle fans serenaded the small, moustachioed man, who was wearing full Saudi traditional dress including a black bisht cloak.

At one point, one Newcastle fan started screaming and pointing at Frayan, claiming that he was the man responsible for the whole takeover. Other fans told him he was mistaken: “He's a different Saudi guy.”

Yet Frayan’s
You must be logged on to see external links
picture is a photograph of him shaking hands with the king, while his header photo is of the crown prince.

The journalist went around taking pictures with fans, many of them children,
You must be logged on to see external links
to hold up a picture of Mohammed bin Salman.

Earlier this year, a US intelligence report found that the crown prince was responsible for the killing of Khashoggi - an association Newcastle would surely be eager to avoid.
 
Mackem2017 said:
What an absolute load of bollocks

You must be logged on to see media items
Click to expand...
And @Biffo The Bear thinks not many wore Saudi fancy dress.
In the background of this and most photos you see these absolute bellsniffs.
When spurs equalised yesterday , behind the goal you can see about 100 people and several have fancy dress on supporting the evil dictator.
 
Skellington said:
Decent article here - strongly implies that the mags have already been completely brainwashed

You must be logged on to see external links

Those trying to argue the difference between the sovereign wealth fund and the government will not have been helped by a small, but very vocal, group of Saudi men outside St James' Park, who went around holding a Saudi flag and pictures of the crown prince and King Salman.

It appears they did not get the memo that the Saudi takeover supposedly had nothing to do with the government or royal family.

Saudi journalist Ibrahim al-Frayan was the most prominent member of the Saudi contingent outside the stadium. Newcastle fans serenaded the small, moustachioed man, who was wearing full Saudi traditional dress including a black bisht cloak.

At one point, one Newcastle fan started screaming and pointing at Frayan, claiming that he was the man responsible for the whole takeover. Other fans told him he was mistaken: “He's a different Saudi guy.”

Yet Frayan’s
You must be logged on to see external links
picture is a photograph of him shaking hands with the king, while his header photo is of the crown prince.

The journalist went around taking pictures with fans, many of them children,
You must be logged on to see external links
to hold up a picture of Mohammed bin Salman.

Earlier this year, a US intelligence report found that the crown prince was responsible for the killing of Khashoggi - an association Newcastle would surely be eager to avoid.
Click to expand...
It’s the kind of scenes you see in the Middle East when supporters of a dictatorship celebrate an election win
 

Luna17 said:
Mate, I detest the mags as much as you, but let's not kid ourselves, FMA was a bad owner. Ok, he kept a tight ship unlike daft arses like Short and Morris, but haway man, all he wanted was prem survival. Wasn't bothered about the cups, just wanted the sky PL money every season. We'd have hated him just as much as the mags.
As for him as a human being, that expose about his main factory in Derbyshire tells u all u need to know. And his zero hours contracts and ....etc etc.
If he was lying in the roadside on fire, I wudnt piss on the tosser.

And don't get me started on the SA scumbag...
Click to expand...

I think he began with the right intentions but suddenly realised: (i) the game has moved on financially since "the entertainers" and his pockets aren't deep enough and (ii) he will never satisfy this lot. He has wanted out for a long time so his game plan did switch to staying up. If he owned SAFC we might be in the Prem still.

Re: zero hours contracts etc. - perhaps if his staff had the same terms and conditions as Debenhams, Arcadia group ...he would also have gone to the wall.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top