• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space


Nukehasslefan said:
No. It's not a sphere. It's a carbon arc that will show up what is under it, which is what you'll see of the moon after seeing what the carbon arc shows up first, which is what you see as the sun and every other point of light coming from within projected onto the dome.
Click to expand...
I’ve just dipped into this thread for the first time and I’m interested by this.

Do you have a newsletter I could subscribe to?
 
monkeytassle said:
Aside from gravity, photographs and your eyes.
Click to expand...
I believe in real science. Gravity is not one of them because it isn't a scientific reality.
Our eyes see science. Earth is science.
Photographs can be manipulated to not show reality, so they're sketchy at the very least and have to be questioned when the truth of them is not forthcoming.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Here's something for you to get your teeth into. Let's see if you go for the mirage clap trap.

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Mirages a plenty when you look at his numerous other photos 🥱😴

You must be logged on to see external links

Logon or register to see this image
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nukehasslefan said:
I believe in real science. Gravity is not one of them because it isn't a scientific reality.
Our eyes see science. Earth is science.
Photographs can be manipulated to not show reality, so they're sketchy at the very least and have to be questioned when the truth of them is not forthcoming.
Click to expand...
How is gravity not science?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No I don't.
Feel free to put your opinions into here though.
Click to expand...
I just think we’ve got the usual bullying by the science ‘zealots’ here. Just because something seems to be a fact today doesn’t mean it will be tomorrow.

Scientists used to believe that fish had feet and that if you ran fast enough you could get to tomorrow before anyone else did. Both of those facts have now been largely disproved.

So let’s all keep an open mind eh?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Nope but the energy within does.

A bath isn't my major proof at all but you carry on going with that if that's all you can muster for your argument.
Click to expand...
Every single time people have asked you for proof that the earth is not a globe you have said about your bath experiment. That is why I have picked on that.

So when asked to prove a globe, my major thing of saying "look this is an easy observation, this only works on the globe" is the measured angle to polaris. Simple, easy, effective and only works on a globe. You don't agree, fair enough.

If I had to ask you for a single bit of evidence that can realistically be explored (rather than chin rubbing and saying, globe nah bollocks) what would that be?
 
MackemX said:
Mirages a plenty when you look at his numerous other photos 🥱😴

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
Yep, so they say.
The thing is it could never happen on a globe.

At 50 miles on your globe, not only would no buildings be seen but also those buildings would be tipped back over.
Basically you would be stood looking into the sky and the buildings would be angled away from you as you angle a\way from them.
See how silly it all is?

So much contradictory stuff with this global carry on.
monkeytassle said:
How is gravity not science?
Click to expand...
Because it doesn't exist.
 
Big Sharp Teeth said:
I just think we’ve got the usual bullying by the science ‘zealots’ here. Just because something seems to be a fact today doesn’t mean it will be tomorrow.

Scientists used to believe that fish had feet and that if you ran fast enough you could get to tomorrow before anyone else did. Both of those facts have now been largely disproved.

So let’s all keep an open mind eh?
Click to expand...
We have🤷‍♂️
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Yep, so they say.
The thing is it could never happen on a globe.

At 50 miles on your globe, not only would no buildings be seen but also those buildings would be tipped back over.
Basically you would be stood looking into the sky and the buildings would be angled away from you as you angle a\way from them.
See how silly it all is?

So much contradictory stuff with this global carry on.

Because it doesn't exist.
Click to expand...
It quite plainly does. How does water behave in a zero gravity atmosphere?
 
ned_werby said:
More importantly, is his bath watter hot or cowld and does it have a rubber duck in it?
Click to expand...
That could be quite important. When you look at a glass of water you can see the water curves up at the edges. Where solid surfaces meet water, you get a meniscus effect caused by the surface tension of the water. Basically down to certain attractive forces in the water, it causes it to be a 'bit sticky' and rise up the edges or contact point. Another way of doing that is to dip your finger in a glass of water and slowly pull it out. You can see the water 'stick' to you once you have left the level surface.

The effect is only be a couple of millimetres, but visible to the human eye and over 2000 times the curvature of a bath of water relative to the earth. I.e. a rubber duck has much more influence than the curve of the earth does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top