offmenut
Striker
a significant proportion of the pages by mags.This is the biggest thread on this forum, 817 pages since August... Little bubble...
That's deeply mental.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
a significant proportion of the pages by mags.This is the biggest thread on this forum, 817 pages since August... Little bubble...
Nee mention of investment in the region either, that seems to have gone a bit quiet.
Thanks for that. I am out the country at the moment and was getting the impression that no Mags were struggling with this horrendous new ownership. That is a great article and credit to her for being so honest. It's how I would feel. I hope it is a significant minority of Mags who are very uncomfortable with this as their club is sullied as no club has ever been. And that won't change.You must be logged on to see external links
Haway Jean come over to the light side
Erm no, my Labour MP said it'll have an impact on South Shields...mind she also said we bury our dead in our back gardens as we can't afford funerals as well so....By investing in the region they mean Newcastle and possibly there will be job opportunities for those that live outside the City. We all know they won't be investing outside of Newcastle, why would they?
Just one account buddy, you guys have been irrelevant for 4+ years hence the absence, I was just shocked at the number of the human rights activists on this board.
You claimed I had more than one account, you questioned my 4 year absence, I rebutted both of those claims, if there is nothing to 'argue with' then acknowledge that you were wrong instead of posting emojis.Counter argument to what? You didn't put anything on to argue with...buddy...
Tears man absolute salty tears..
A mag that is honest fair play to him.
You must be logged on to see media items
What are the numbers? Posts made by Newcastle fans vs Sunderland fans?a significant proportion of the pages by mags.
That's deeply mental.
Alright, you might have just one account. The fact you came on after 4 years to gloat suggests you are a bit of a clown. That ok?You claimed I had more than one account, you questioned my 4 year absence, I rebutted both of those claims, if there is nothing to 'argue with' then acknowledge that you were wrong instead of posting emojis.
It is yes.Thanks for posting, I have a self-imposed media blackout at the moment.
Is that from today?
Yet another one who misses the point. You don't have to be a human rights activist to be appalled by this just an ordinary decent human being. Check any football message board of any team and you will find exactly the same sentiments as expressed on here. Contrary to your perception there are many, many decent people in this country - not so many supporting your team it would appear.Just one account buddy, you guys have been irrelevant for 4+ years hence the absence, I was just shocked at the number of the human rights activists on this board.
Surely you can do better than that?
You take the trouble to log on here to wind us up and come across like a teenager in Instagram. My 18 year old would blush with embarrassment using lines like that.
Seriously mate, raise your game.
Otherwise you're in danger of looking as stupid as the NUFC fans who invaded this board after you last takeover?
Boasting about your new billionaire owner who wanted to throw money at you to "have some fun and win trophies".
By the way?
How did that go?
They never came back to update us on the trophies you'd won after the massive spending spree Ashley was going to go on?
Yes trying to say it just the same as Chelsea, Man City etc. I'm afraid it's not - their owners aren't accused of murder.There’s a few mags been camped on here all weekend.
what a life![]()
If you call being one of the top ~12 clubs in the country over the past 4 years as being 'irrelevant' I'd like to know how you would describe Sunderland?You've been absent as you've been irrelevant as we have only you've been stinking up the PL doing nowt and getting beaten most weeks. You were certainties to go down before the takeover and may still.
Thought you suffered under Ashley?If you call being one of the top ~12 clubs in the country over the past 4 years as being 'irrelevant' I'd like to know how you would describe Sunderland?
Probably the best post from a mag on here. Completely agree. I don't expect you or any other mags to walk away from your club. Some will, but most wouldn't. I don't expect you not to be excited about the future from a footballing point of view. Most clubs exist by plodding along year to year, having the potential to legitimately challenge is always going to be exciting. That's all completely understandable. Enjoy it if it happens.That's the bit of the fans' reaction to this that embarrasses me. Some of it is misguided excitement, some of it is ignorant, none of it palatable to me.
We can celebrate the club leaving Ashley consigned to the history books, we can celebrate what the money means for the club and what the stated ambitions are. But there's absolutely no need to lower ourselves to being complicit in Sportswashing.
In reality we should use the new found wealth and attention to have conversations about what's going on in Saudi Arabia, the Trust should encourage groups to have dialogue with the fans about their wholly legitimate concerns. The flag groups should make f***ing certain the rainbow flags are big, bold and front and centre. If Amnesty International wants to protest the owners outside the ground we should respect it, (but I'm certain a depressingly noticeable number will heckle them).
We've had no real say in who buys the club, but we have a say in how we behave from here on in.
Can you quote where I gloated? Can you quote where I said you are now relevant?Alright, you might have just one account. The fact you came on after 4 years to gloat suggests you are a bit of a clown. That ok?
* And why after 4 years are we now relevant?
Saw that this morning. The black guy said ‘if it could be proved the Saudis were behind certain atrocities then it should be rightly looked atThanks for posting, I have a self-imposed media blackout at the moment.
Is that from today?