• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nukehasslefan said:
You clearly missed the venting part.

Don't worry yourself about my life. Don't concern yourself about whether I'm happy or sad or struggling.
Worry about your own life and those who are dear to you. I'm absolutely fine.
I just thought I'd let you know in case you worried about the rest of my life. ;)
Click to expand...
So about the indentations that support this huge body of water on your map.......
DaveH said:
This is a fun thing to waste a lot of time with:
You must be logged on to see external links

Falling sand/water games were popular in the early 90s as home computers got more powerful. A lot of computer magazines had programming sections and falling particles were a fun thing to play with an experiment with. Usually each pixel was treated individually and followed a set of basic rules. If nothing below fall, if nothing to the left or right move randomly in one of the two directions, if nothing to the left then it would just move left, same for right and if there was something below, left and right, just stay put. This give a reasonable simulation of how water falls on earth. It doesn't take into account the minimal gravitational field of wall compared to that of the earth.

With the above web page, you can create a slope and have water running down it, down it flows into a lower trough. If you then turn the water off (tip, you can add a spout object at the top) then the water eventually flows to the bottom and leaves the slope dry. You can then add little indentations into it and it does indeed hold water. But the only way to achieve that is to make a stepped effect where the step edges come to the surface. Perhaps people who sail ships know about these but don't tell us because it is part of the lie. Clearly a ship hitting a step edge would not fair well.
Click to expand...
Yeah he didn't answer that part of my question.
Unless there are loads of secret locks like on canals, yet the sea always looks so flat, no steps 🤔😂
 
Last edited:

taipeisafc said:
Bloody hell you are thicker than a castle wall. They will almost certainly have to heat the electronics in space to keep them.working. And space is not a vacuum for the umpteenth time. Moron
Click to expand...
Aye, so they tell us. They tell us it's so close as to be a vacuum but still has a few scattered particles in, not to mention big rocks and gaseous planets and fiery suns dotted about...but we won't go into that.

Ok so let's look at felix's supposed balloon capsule jump.
It was said he fell from 128,000 feet and his free fall gathered pace to 800 mph before atmosphere slowed him down.
The reason for his freefall was due to it being so close to a vacuum as to basically be one....as we were told.

So let's hop back into your space again and let's sort out this not a vacuum carry on, as you say.
You see the contradictory stuff borders on hilarity but I'll keep a near straight face and try and be serious over these stories.
It isn't easy when you see the mockery of those who push this nonsense.
legend7 said:
So about the indentations that support this huge body of water on your map.......

Yeah he didn't answer that part of my question.
Unless there are loads of secret locks like on canals, yet the sea always looks so flat, no steps 🤔😂
Click to expand...
I'll just have to let you decide what a gradual gradient would be and what an indentation would be over a massive expanse of Earth.
Nothing more I can say really.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
Aye, so they tell us. They tell us it's so close as to be a vacuum but still has a few scattered particles in, not to mention big rocks and gaseous planets and fiery suns dotted about...but we won't go into that.

Ok so let's look at felix's supposed balloon capsule jump.
It was said he fell from 128,000 feet and his free fall gathered pace to 800 mph before atmosphere slowed him down.
The reason for his freefall was due to it being so close to a vacuum as to basically be one....as we were told.

So let's hop back into your space again and let's sort out this not a vacuum carry on, as you say.
You see the contradictory stuff borders on hilarity but I'll keep a near straight face and try and be serious over these stories.
It isn't easy when you see the mockery of those who push this nonsense.

I'll just have to let you decide what a gradual gradient would be and what an indentation would be over a massive expanse of Earth.
Nothing more I can say really.
Click to expand...

eh?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I'll just have to let you decide what a gradual gradient would be and what an indentation would be over a massive expanse of Earth.
Nothing more I can say really.
Click to expand...
That doesn't even make sense or answer the question. Your "map" clearly shows a vast area of water that begins at a high quite central point but finishes at the lowest point on your map, what keeps the top water there?
Bearing in mind your logic for the earth not being a globe is based on an observation in a 5ft bathtub its odd you ask us to imagine indentations over massive expanses of earth to now suit your narrative.
 
payne said:
I think he just explained why he fell faster further up
Click to expand...
I explained why we were told he fell without resistance to the fall due to a vacuum as we were told. So close as to be one we were told.
I'll help you out.
legend7 said:
That doesn't even make sense or answer the question. Your "map" clearly shows a vast area of water that begins at a high quite central point but finishes at the lowest point on your map, what keeps the top water there?
Bearing in mind your logic for the earth not being a globe is based on an observation in a 5ft bathtub its odd you ask us to imagine indentations over massive expanses of earth to now suit your narrative.
Click to expand...
Based on a 5 foot bathtub, eh. Ok, we'll leave it at that with you.
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
I explained why we were told he fell without resistance to the fall due to a vacuum as we were told. So close as to be one we were told.
I'll help you out.

Based on a 5 foot bathtub, eh. Ok, we'll leave it at that with you.
Click to expand...
That was your proof the earth isn't a curve, because water is flat in your bath was it not?
So about these seas that seem to be on a slope?
Actually your own map proves water isn't flat and horizontal?
I'm genuinely intrigued about this now?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Add in as many things as you can muster up if it pacifies you. ;)

About what?
Click to expand...

The is proof that certain substances promote paranoia and irrational thinking leading to a disbelief and rejection of reality. But as you dismiss conventional science, I’ll not divert the thread onto a separate topic.
 
DPTT said:
Can someone (hopefully @Nukehasslefan ) explain the bathtub experiment please and how it proves the earth is not a globe🤷‍♂️
Click to expand...

Water conforms to the shape of the container it is in like a bath. Always finds its level so can't possibly curve.
But he says because there's an ice dome that means its in a container so the lemon squeezer model works because it's enclosed and has steps in the ocean. Keep up man.
 
What A Waster said:
Water conforms to the shape of the container it is in like a bath. Always finds its level so can't possibly curve.
But he says because there's an ice dome that means its in a container so the lemon squeezer model works because it's enclosed and has steps in the ocean. Keep up man.
Click to expand...
😂😂
Makes perfect sense😜😂
 
What A Waster said:
Water conforms to the shape of the container it is in like a bath. Always finds its level so can't possibly curve.
But he says because there's an ice dome that means its in a container so the lemon squeezer model works because it's enclosed and has steps in the ocean. Keep up man.
Click to expand...
Also, because the curve it has to conform to on the lemon squeezer is so big, it can work. However that same rule doesn't apply to the huge curve of the globe Earth because reasons.
 
legend7 said:
That doesn't even make sense or answer the question. Your "map" clearly shows a vast area of water that begins at a high quite central point but finishes at the lowest point on your map, what keeps the top water there?
Click to expand...
My map?
legend7 said:
Bearing in mind your logic for the earth not being a globe is based on an observation in a 5ft bathtub
Click to expand...
No, it's not.
legend7 said:
its odd you ask us to imagine indentations over massive expanses of earth to now suit your narrative.
Click to expand...
I said it a long time ago and also on here a fair way back.
Maybe you overlooked it or came in too late.
 
chelt_mackem said:
Also, because the curve it has to conform to on the lemon squeezer is so big, it can work. However that same rule doesn't apply to the huge curve of the globe Earth because reasons.
Click to expand...

That's right. Forgot that bit. It's such a huge area that the gradient is almost in detectable on the lemon squeezer. Doesn't work on the globe though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top