• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

@Nukehasslefan seems to be the stereotypical bloke who didn't do very well at school but his ego won't accept it so he rejects that failure by deciding it was all rubbish anyway and, actually, it couldn't cope with his unfettered intellect. He sees beyond the predictable, sheep-like tendencies of so-called 'clever' people who can only think within the 'narrative'. Hawking might have been 'clever' but he couldn't free his mind to ask the real questions that often occur to the truly gifted when they're sitting in the bath.

Bit of cod psychology is always fun.
 

Nukehasslefan said:
Then, lets for a minute assume that space and the dwarf planet pluto is real and we could send a probe there. With a camera at a suitable distance, why could we not see it in plain sight?
Click to expand...

Are you really asking why we can't see things easily that are far away? :lol:
Nukehasslefan said:
Believe what?

I'm not offering proof to myself. I'm looking for proof.
I believe in what I'm doing.
When I have proof I'll offer it as I have with water level killing the global spinning Earth stone dead on just two words.
An experiment that any person can observe, test and repeat.
Click to expand...

Then why haven't you observed and tested it with equipment that is suitably accurate? Your eyes alone are not.
Nukehasslefan said:
It's all about a person asking themselves a big question.
Does water conform to a container or does it work well when poured onto a spinning ball.

I know the real answer and so do many many people.
The problem we have here is in people do not want to go against a set narrative for fear of ridicule.
Mainstream teachings propose a spinning ball is much better to hold water which has no issue with curving.


It doesn't seem to matter to people that they can observe, test and repeat the water in any container experiment being legitimate and water poured onto a ball being nothing more than a floor full of water.

Each to their own.
Click to expand...

You're not proving anything by pouring water onto a spinning ball, because nobody is trying to tell you that water SHOULD conform to a ball that small and lacking in mass (and therefore lacking in gravity of meaningful size).

If you want to disprove "the narrative" then you need to first understand the narrative and then devise tests that show that the narrative is wrong.

The narrative will tell you that water shouldn't conform to a football because a football isn't massive enough to be exerting a gravitational pull on the water strong enough to keep the water stuck to it.

So, all you have done by pouring water onto a football is prove that the narrative is actually TRUE.
 
Last edited:
fyl2u said:
Are you really asking why we can't see things easily that are far away? :lol:


Then why haven't you observed and tested it with equipment that is suitably accurate? Your eyes alone are not.


You're not proving anything by pouring water onto a spinning ball, because nobody is trying to tell you that water SHOULD conform to a ball that small and lacking in mass (and therefore lacking in gravity of meaningful size).

If you want to disprove "the narrative" then you need to first understand the narrative and then devise tests that show that the narrative is wrong.

The narrative will tell you that water shouldn't conform to a football because a football isn't massive enough to be exerting a gravitational pull on the water strong enough to keep the water stuck to it.

So, all you have done by pouring water onto a football is prove that the narrative is actually TRUE.
Click to expand...
There is also the aspect of doing such an experiment on earth.

Scatter iron filings on a table, then get a massive magnet like one used on scrap yard cranes and put it under the table. Wave a small magnet above the iron filings. They don't move. Magnetism doesn't exist, it is all a lie.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Indentations
Click to expand...
There are no Indentations that would stop a body of water some 2 or 3 thousand miles long running to the bottom.
Could you mark on your map where these Indentations are?
Nukehasslefan said:
No.
Anything that doesn't offer proof or begs questions will not be readily believed.
Click to expand...
You do know you're going to die having led a totally paranoid life living a lie rather than embracing such an amazing thing.
I find that quite sad.
Even the trump loons are millions strong, you're probably one of only 100 people allowing this nonsense to take over your life.
Good luck though but we don't get long on this planet
 
Last edited:
DaveH said:
There is also the aspect of doing such an experiment on earth.

Scatter iron filings on a table, then get a massive magnet like one used on scrap yard cranes and put it under the table. Wave a small magnet above the iron filings. They don't move. Magnetism doesn't exist, it is all a lie.
Click to expand...
I think you've blown my mind. 😂
 
taipeisafc said:
Ask yourself what would happen to your computer if you took the fan out of it and offered it no venting?
The components would heat up and burn out.
In your extreme low pressure of space you are offered nothing to vent and no fan to work.
Your components would simply heat up consistently and burn out in short order.

The reality would likely be different if we want to go right down the rabbit hole and simple understand that in that environment, (which wouldn't actually be one) nothing would exist to do anything....but let's deal with what the storytellers sell us.

I picked your biggest piece of drivel from your moronic post (it wasnt easy) you have no clue a fan simply increases the rate of cooling by driving air over the heat sink. Put a computer outside in winter and you dont need a fan you clueless gonk. Learn something about heat transfer before spouting drivel you plank
Click to expand...
You clearly missed the venting part.
legend7 said:
There are no Indentations that would stop a body of water some 2 or 3 thousand miles long running to the bottom.
Could you mark on your map where these Indentations are?

You do know you're going to die having led a totally paranoid life living a lie rather than embracing such an amazing thing.
I find that quite sad.
Even the trump loons are millions strong, you're probably one of only 100 people allowing this nonsense to take over your life.
Good luck though but we don't get long on this planet
Click to expand...
Don't worry yourself about my life. Don't concern yourself about whether I'm happy or sad or struggling.
Worry about your own life and those who are dear to you. I'm absolutely fine.
I just thought I'd let you know in case you worried about the rest of my life. ;)
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
You clearly missed the venting part.

Don't worry yourself about my life. Don't concern yourself about whether I'm happy or sad or struggling.
Worry about your own life and those who are dear to you. I'm absolutely fine.
I just thought I'd let you know in case you worried about the rest of my life. ;)
Click to expand...
What about venting? Why can't a spacecraft vent heat from its radiators?
 
Nobby said:
Yes there is a medium it's in a partial vacuum. A little research will show you thermal control is an integral part of the design
Click to expand...
Partial vacuum?
Space is told as a vacuum with scattered particles somehow floating about.
There's no medium for anything to work.

The closest medium to allow something to work would be in lower pressure at high altitude. Extreme low pressure like the so called vacuum of space would offer no medium for travel or life or anything.

It's sci-fi story telling.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Partial vacuum?
Space is told as a vacuum with scattered particles somehow floating about.
There's no medium for anything to work.

The closest medium to allow something to work would be in lower pressure at high altitude. Extreme low pressure like the so called vacuum of space would offer no medium for travel or life or anything.

It's sci-fi story telling.
Click to expand...

is it similar to the frozen zone around projection central?
 
ned_werby said:
Can we arrange to put his space vacuum theories to the test?
Click to expand...
You can't put something that does not exist to the test but you can use logic to show why it can't exist and why vehicles cannot operate in it.
Sci-fi can cater for anything and it certainly caters for the space stories. But that's all they are is how we're told, anyway.
payne said:
or right. everything you say is possible. I forgot.
Click to expand...
Of course.
 
another space actor getting in on the lie now

beam me up scotty bollocks

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Partial vacuum?
Space is told as a vacuum with scattered particles somehow floating about.
There's no medium for anything to work.

The closest medium to allow something to work would be in lower pressure at high altitude. Extreme low pressure like the so called vacuum of space would offer no medium for travel or life or anything.

It's sci-fi story telling.
Click to expand...
Wrong on so many levels but wtf it's Sunday
 
going into orbit next month. going to give some class close ups of the lights on the ice dome

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Partial vacuum?
Space is told as a vacuum with scattered particles somehow floating about.
There's no medium for anything to work.

The closest medium to allow something to work would be in lower pressure at high altitude. Extreme low pressure like the so called vacuum of space would offer no medium for travel or life or anything.

It's sci-fi story telling.
Click to expand...

Bloody hell you are thicker than a castle wall. They will almost certainly have to heat the electronics in space to keep them.working. And space is not a vacuum for the umpteenth time. Moron
 
legend7 said:
There are no Indentations that would stop a body of water some 2 or 3 thousand miles long running to the bottom.
Could you mark on your map where these Indentations are?

You do know you're going to die having led a totally paranoid life living a lie rather than embracing such an amazing thing.
I find that quite sad.
Even the trump loons are millions strong, you're probably one of only 100 people allowing this nonsense to take over your life.
Good luck though but we don't get long on this planet
Click to expand...
This is a fun thing to waste a lot of time with:
You must be logged on to see external links

Falling sand/water games were popular in the early 90s as home computers got more powerful. A lot of computer magazines had programming sections and falling particles were a fun thing to play with an experiment with. Usually each pixel was treated individually and followed a set of basic rules. If nothing below fall, if nothing to the left or right move randomly in one of the two directions, if nothing to the left then it would just move left, same for right and if there was something below, left and right, just stay put. This give a reasonable simulation of how water falls on earth. It doesn't take into account the minimal gravitational field of wall compared to that of the earth.

With the above web page, you can create a slope and have water running down it, down it flows into a lower trough. If you then turn the water off (tip, you can add a spout object at the top) then the water eventually flows to the bottom and leaves the slope dry. You can then add little indentations into it and it does indeed hold water. But the only way to achieve that is to make a stepped effect where the step edges come to the surface. Perhaps people who sail ships know about these but don't tell us because it is part of the lie. Clearly a ship hitting a step edge would not fair well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top