Put a flat earthier into space

[Kevj]

you can’t then. Thanks.

He has consistently been unable to answer anything quantifiable for weeks.

 

[Ambivalent Dave]

He has consistently been unable to answer anything quantifiable for weeks.

As conspiracies go, motiveless ones are pretty rubbish.

 

[DPTT]

@Nukehasslefan

can you answer this please?


So what exactly prevents planes from trying to fly over this hole?
Has their been any recorded crashes in this zone, surely you can provide some evidence of this

 

[Nukehasslefan]

He has consistently been unable to answer anything quantifiable for weeks.

Not quite true but you're welcome to think that, obviously.

There's never been a proof offered for a spinning global Earth but plenty of chatter about there being one.

@Nukehasslefan

can you answer this please?


So what exactly prevents planes from trying to fly over this hole?
Has their been any recorded crashes in this zone, surely you can provide some evidence of this

It's been answered. Ask some of your mates on here, they'll tell you.

 

[DaveH]

So you're happy to accept everything matches for a circle and not a globe, right?

Obviously it isn't.
Your sun is supposedly 93 million miles in a space vacuum as we're told.

I've already explained why you can't travel too close.

No, I haven't. I explained but it was ignored by you.

I didn't choose to ignore it. I explained that as well but you chose to ignore it, it seems.

I gave you an answer. You not liking the answer is not my concern.

On my model, a circle is all I have really proved, as if we are living on the edge of a pound coin, not on the flat disc part. If we can both agree on that, then we can move on to the next bit,

 

[DPTT]

Not quite true but you're welcome to think that, obviously.

There's never been a proof offered for a spinning global Earth but plenty of chatter about there being one.

It's been answered. Ask some of your mates on here, they'll tell you.

You’ve said that before matey and didn’t really work them either.

we can all make up stuff (although to be fair you are on another level) but your responses as of late are just deflecting rather than trying to explain your theory.

Pretty disappointing as people are asking relative questions as well.

Out of interest where is the British Isles on your world map in relation to this huge hole where the sun is?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

On my model, a circle is all I have really proved, as if we are living on the edge of a pound coin, not on the flat disc part. If we can both agree on that, then we can move on to the next bit,

Nope.
Living on the edge of a pound coin is not my Earth mindset. We don't live on any edge on mine.
You're basically trying to put out that you can angle to a star with a line from your pound coin and gain size and distance.
How?

You’ve said that before matey and didn’t really work them either.

we can all make up stuff (although to be fair you are on another level) but your responses as of late are just deflecting rather than trying to explain your theory.

Pretty disappointing as people are asking relative questions as well.

You're not asking relative questions.

Out of interest where is the British Isles on your world map in relation to this huge hole where the sun is?

Away from it.

 

[DPTT]

Nope.
Living on the edge of a pound coin is not my Earth mindset. We don't live on any edge on mine.
You're basically trying to put out that you can angle to a star with a line from your pound coin and gain size and distance.
How?

You're not asking relative questions.


Away from it.

Well obviously

But surely you must have a “musing” as to where?

 

[DaveH]

Nope.
Living on the edge of a pound coin is not my Earth mindset. We don't live on any edge on mine.
You're basically trying to put out that you can angle to a star with a line from your pound coin and gain size and distance.
How?

How about looking through my past posts where I have said on almost every single post, this proves the shape of the earth, not size and distance to the stars.

The bottom line is the angles in my model work exactly as observed, no matter what your mindset. And you have summed it up there, you refuse to see it.

While living on the edge of a pound coin is absurd, if the angles work for that, the next logical question is what if you turned it 90 degrees, would it still work? Yes. What about 20 degrees? Still yes. What about 1 degree, still yes, A disc rotated through 180 degrees describes a sphere, therefor it clearly works on a globe.

The only shape where the observed angles to polaris as you move south is a globe as demonstrated. But you refuse to see it and will continue to deny all proof.

Though I do accept that understanding the proof may be beyond the limits of your intelligence. It is quite simple, but when you keep banging on that it does not prove the distance to the stars when I have said 25 times it is not what it is doing, I think it is right to question your intelligence. I don’t think it is very high.

 

[Ambivalent Dave]

You know the way primary school kids take weather balloons and go pro cameras, fly them up to the edge of the atmosphere then put their videos on YouTube showing the blackness of space and the curvature of the earth?

You’d think a flattie would have done the same wouldn’t you?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Well obviously

But surely you must have a “musing” as to where?

I don't want to be making stuff up to pass off as factual so I won't go into that.

Do you know where it is?

 

[Bear]

See that flat earth idiot is still getting a new one torn daily

Gonk

 

[Nobby]

I don't want to be making stuff up to pass off as factual so I won't go into that.

POST OF THE YEAR

 

[Ambivalent Dave]

I don't want to be making stuff up to pass off as factual so I won't go into that.

Do you know where it is?

 

[DPTT]

I don't want to be making stuff up to pass off as factual so I won't go into that.

Do you know where it is?

On a global earth yes, based on scientific and historical data.

But at least you’ve admitted you have no idea, think it’s the first time you’ve done this

You’ve still refused to answer regarding no fly zones or why their is no records of planes being unable to attempt to fly over your “hole” though. Surely you would have some data that shows potentially where it is?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

How about looking through my past posts where I have said on almost every single post, this proves the shape of the earth, not size and distance to the stars.

It proves nothing of the sort.

The bottom line is the angles in my model work exactly as observed, no matter what your mindset. And you have summed it up there, you refuse to see it.

Work exactly as observed as in what?

While living on the edge of a pound coin is absurd, if the angles work for that, the next logical question is what if you turned it 90 degrees, would it still work? Yes.

On your pound coin, yes. But what are you proving with your pound coin?

What about 20 degrees? Still yes. What about 1 degree, still yes, A disc rotated through 180 degrees describes a sphere, therefor it clearly works on a globe.

A disc rotated 180 degrees is a disc rotated 180 degrees. Nothing more.

The only shape where the observed angles to polaris as you move south is a globe as demonstrated. But you refuse to see it and will continue to deny all proof.

It's not proof of anything to do with a globe. You know this.

Though I do accept that understanding the proof may be beyond the limits of your intelligence.

Here we go again.
And here's you trying your utmost to make a divvy like me understand, eh?
Why are you even bothering?

It is quite simple, but when you keep banging on that it does not prove the distance to the stars when I have said 25 times it is not what it is doing, I think it is right to question your intelligence. I don’t think it is very high.

You have my permission to question anything about me and you also have my permission to call me any names you feel may strike a nerve.
However it does bring into question your intelligence when you have to use this to try and deal with someone who you think is a backward divvy.

You carry on with my blessing if it makes you feel superior. You have a few back slappers so you're doing ok.

You know the way primary school kids take weather balloons and go pro cameras, fly them up to the edge of the atmosphere then put their videos on YouTube showing the blackness of space and the curvature of the earth?

You’d think a flattie would have done the same wouldn’t you?

How do you know it's space?

See that flat earth idiot is still getting a new one torn daily

Gonk

Yeah. Join in if you can muster up something a bit more soul destroying to me.

On a global earth yes, based on scientific and historical data.

But you are reliant on that, right?
Your globe is what you're told not what you know for sure.

But at least you’ve admitted you have no idea, think it’s the first time you’ve done this

Nah it's not.

You’ve still refused to answer regarding no fly zones or why their is no records of planes being unable to attempt to fly over your “hole” though. Surely you would have some data that shows potentially where it is?

Yes I did but you have overlooked.
Ask your mates on here.

 

[legend7]

I'll rephrase my earlier question, I'm not saying your crystal light sound generator is on a map but maps obviously work as people navigate using them so with you being the world leader in this particular field, where "roughly" do you think this place is using current mapping.
You seem to know where reflections bounce from to form shadows and day and night in different countries so you must have narrowed it down to an appx area of origin?

 

[DPTT]

It proves nothing of the sort.



Work exactly as observed as in what?


On your pound coin, yes. But what are you proving with your pound coin?


A disc rotated 180 degrees is a disc rotated 180 degrees. Nothing more.


It's not proof of anything to do with a globe. You know this.


Here we go again.
And here's you trying your utmost to make a divvy like me understand, eh?
Why are you even bothering?

You have my permission to question anything about me and you also have my permission to call me any names you feel may strike a nerve.
however it does bring into question your intelligence when you have to use this to try and deal with someone who you think is a backward divvy.

You carry on with my blessing if it makes you feel superior. You have a few back slappers so you're doing ok.

How do you know it's space?

Yeah. Join in if you can muster up something a bit more soul destroying to me.


But you are reliant on that, right?
Your globe is what you're told not what you know for sure.

Nah it's not.

Yes I did but you have overlooked.
Ask your mates on here.

I’ve tried to trawl back and cannot find anything but cannot find anything @Nukehasslefan
Unfortunately I haven’t got the finances to travel into space to see where we are so yes I am reliant on scientific data etc that I won’t deny
But am asking questions based on your “musings” being correct, am not trying to say they aren’t, just trying to understand how your world works
So roughy how big is your “sun” or energy source which is in this hole in the ground?

 

[John Steed]

So you're happy to accept everything matches for a circle and not a globe, right?

Obviously it isn't.
Your sun is supposedly 93 million miles in a space vacuum as we're told.

I've already explained why you can't travel too close.

No, I haven't. I explained but it was ignored by you.

I didn't choose to ignore it. I explained that as well but you chose to ignore it, it seems.

I gave you an answer. You not liking the answer is not my concern.

Why are we being lied to about the shape of the planet? What would every country that has put a man into space gain from lying about what they found? Why would they all keep the same lie going? I can't see what anybody would gain by this lie.

 

[Ambivalent Dave]

How do you know it's space?

irrelevant what 'it' is called. Why haven't the thousands of flatties done exactly the same to debunk the hoax?

irrelevant what 'it' is called. Why haven't the thousands of flatties done exactly the same to debunk the hoax?

(*awaits inevitable deflection, and taking the conversation in another direction*)