• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

The model works for what?
For height and distance?
If so....no.
No, for the shape of the earth. Do I need a disclaimer on every post to say all the things I'm not talking about?

My model shows people living on a circle representing a cross section of the earth. The angles to polaris match those observed showing that we could live on a globe or in this case lets just say we could live on a circle. We know we can do east-west travel as well as north south, but ok the model was only looking at north south so lets just say it works if we lived on essentially a coin where we are on the edge of the coin. The angles match perfectly.
 

You're welcome to say that but proving it is another matter.

I'm the same with the spinning globe. I laugh at it now but at one time I actually believed it.

Aye, maybe I've missed something. ;)
So where on our maps roughly is this crystal projector?
And why couldn't you fly towards it, and if planes accidentally have surely there would be lots have vanished or been obliterated or are you saying air traffic controllers know your secret too and know where it is?
 
So where on our maps roughly is this crystal projector?
And why couldn't you fly towards it, and if planes accidentally have surely there would be lots have vanished or been obliterated or are you saying air traffic controllers know your secret too and know where it is?
He’s ignored this question a few times now😂
 
Water sits in a container. That container cannot be flat.
The Earth terrain is not flat in many instances. Mountains, hills, roughness. The seas are rarely flat and level due to waves and swell but lakes and ponds and such are flat.

Nothing to do with just a bath tub but something as simple s one can prove flat and level to anyone that uses their own logical mind against the global narrative.

Imagine thinking water can just stay on a spinning ball and stay flat and level. I used to believe it all until I started to question it and do simple little experiments that anyone can do for themselves.

To thin k people think we're look at light from hundreds of years in the past or even thousands or even millions. It shocks me.

As for wasting your time on me. Put me on ignore. Don't waste another second. Let's see if you can do it.

You miss the point. I'm asking for how you know star distances and size.
I have no issue with simple navigation of points of light once a person knows which point of light is at a particular destination which will be above it.

You see, this is what I'm saying about knowing a reference point.

So putting that aside, lets get back to yur global spinning Earth and your star distances and sizes.
If you want we can start with the sun and the moon as you believe them to be.


Soooo, we have a sun at 93 million miles and a moon at 238,000 miles, as we're told.

Both look the same size when viewed but we are told they are because of the distance and sizes.

Ok then, if they look the same size and are different, show me why they were calculated to be that with your angles.

Your stars can wait a bit.

And level if you don't swish it about.

It's no cop out answer. You asked and I gave you an answer.
You not liking the answer is of no concern to me.


Anyone can back up water level, it doesn't need me.
People can sort this stuff for themselves if they can allow themselves to think outside of the set narratives they were schooled into.
no you didn’t answer, you said I can’t comprehend it if you did tell me.

ill try again shall I?
Who/What is the benefit to the largest conspiracy on the planet, that we in fact don’t live on a spinning globe in space, and because of that, a massive part of science as we know it is all a complete fabrication?

that’s all I want to know
 
No, for the shape of the earth. Do I need a disclaimer on every post to say all the things I'm not talking about?

My model shows people living on a circle representing a cross section of the earth. The angles to polaris match those observed showing that we could live on a globe or in this case lets just say we could live on a circle. We know we can do east-west travel as well as north south, but ok the model was only looking at north south so lets just say it works if we lived on essentially a coin where we are on the edge of the coin. The angles match perfectly.
So you're happy to accept everything matches for a circle and not a globe, right?
So where on our maps roughly is this crystal projector?
Obviously it isn't.
Your sun is supposedly 93 million miles in a space vacuum as we're told.
And why couldn't you fly towards it, and if planes accidentally have surely there would be lots have vanished or been obliterated or are you saying air traffic controllers know your secret too and know where it is?
I've already explained why you can't travel too close.
He’s ignored this question a few times now😂
No, I haven't. I explained but it was ignored by you.
Unless you put a laser over the length of kielder which would prove its not flat.
But you choose to ignore that
I didn't choose to ignore it. I explained that as well but you chose to ignore it, it seems.
no you didn’t answer, you said I can’t comprehend it if you did tell me.

ill try again shall I?
Who/What is the benefit to the largest conspiracy on the planet, that we in fact don’t live on a spinning globe in space, and because of that, a massive part of science as we know it is all a complete fabrication?

that’s all I want to know
I gave you an answer. You not liking the answer is not my concern.
 
Last edited:
So you're happy to accept everything matches for a circle and not a globe, right?

Obviously it isn't.
Your sun is supposedly 93 million miles in a space vacuum as we're told.

I've already explained why you can't travel too close.

No, I haven't. I explained but it was ignored by you.

I didn't choose to ignore it. I explained that as well but you chose to ignore it, it seems.

I gave you an answer. You not liking the answer is not my concern.
No you didn’t answer. I want to know who has benefitted? That’s all. If you gave me an answer, what was it?
 
No you didn’t answer. I want to know who has benefitted? That’s all. If you gave me an answer, what was it?
Who benefits from religion?
Who benefits from anything in life?
Do you accept that the minority own the majority of the wealth?
See if you can answer those questions with what you think.
 
I'm sure you'll get far with that attitude.
It’s a perfectly valid question on the subject that you seemingly can’t answer. That you’re unable to answer it tells you all you need to know really. Deflecting it with a huffy response about attitude or moving onto religion. :lol:

I’ll try again. Answer the question please, as it’s central to your entire argument. Defend your position.
 
It’s a perfectly valid question on the subject that you seemingly can’t answer. That you’re unable to answer it tells you all you need to know really.

I’ll try again. Answer the question please, as it’s central to your entire argument. Defend your position.
I answered the question.
Or do you mean you want me to actually give you names of people who benefit?
 
I won't waste my time trying to tell you who gains from bottom to top. I don't mean that in a nasty way, I mean it would be pointless. It's up to yourself to try and see where the reasoning might come in for why certain people would want gain.
This answer here? It’s not an answer at all really is it?

what/who benefits from the hoax? Just groups. Not specifics
 
Last edited:
Back
Top