• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nukehasslefan said:
Better techniques?
We're talking over 100 light years or around 57 trillion miles of discrepancy just in those figures. It's so nonsensical it's actually sad to think we are made to swallow that garbage.


No man made object will ever get into space. Not the space they tell us about, anyway.
The space vacuum sees to that. They kill off their own story by using a space vacuum.
Just remember the story of the stars. We see the light from stars as they were in the past, as we're told. So how can anything be measured?
let's just take this polaris so called star at the brand new calculated distance of 323 light years. We see that light as it was 323 years ago. This is what we're told. We see 323 years into the past by looking at the pinpoint light. And people are made to swallow it because those big genius science astronomers and theoretical physicists said so.

Dazzle us with brilliance and baffle us all with utter bull****......IMO.




No issue with changing maps of Earth.
We have better aerial visuals and tech to physically marry a lot of stuff up.
I have no issues with it.

Using this against using stars is (cough) light years apart. (pun intended).

Can you elaborate on what you're trying to get across?

No issue with workshops and tolerances. Like I said with physical things with a reference point. No issue.

What is Newtonian physics?
Is it gravity?
If gravity is involved then you could easily explain what it is, right?
You can also explain how it works with your job, right?

If you can then I'd like to see it.
If you refuse then no issue.


Peer reviewed for accuracy?
Wasn't the polaris star peer reviewed for accuracy before it was altered to be over 100 light years less?

You've yet to demonstrate competence in anything you've put forward, so what are you after?

Nor does it validate a global Earth from your side, either.
Click to expand...
You really are the most arrogant thicko that Ive ever had the misfortune to have experienced. You know nothing you absolute bellend, now kindly take your tin foil hat and your make believe fantasies elsewhere. You are an insult to mankind.
 

Kevj said:
The distance doesn’t vary. Better techniques were used which changed the result and the recorded distance was amended. As we put sophisticated technology into space, we are able to undertake more precise measurements and older resulted become superseded.

There’s maps of the world that don’t include the Americas, but that doesn’t mean we live in a world were there is and isn’t this land mass. It’s just newer knowledge.

And as for geometry, why would a millimetre or 1degree be different here or a million light years away? The angles being measured to determine the distance of a star are fractions of a degree due to the relative distance, so accuracy is dependent on the precision of the equipment being used. The same way that tolerances apply with every day measuring equipment in workshops.
Click to expand...

He will ignore that - especially the last sentences
 
Not sure the hate filled comments getting flung towards @Nukehasslefan are very fair. It just comes over as these people’s heads exploding because they can’t process what he is saying and so they throw their toys out of the pram. They’re only words, they’re not hurting people.
 
Lefty Frizzell said:
Not sure the hate filled comments getting flung towards @Nukehasslefan are very fair. It just comes over as these people’s heads exploding because they can’t process what he is saying and so they throw their toys out of the pram. They’re only words, they’re not hurting people.
Click to expand...
He’s basically now refuting everything and saying it in a manner that we are all idiots. His demeanour has changed lately and I can understand how people are reacting to him.
 
The Krankie Returns said:
I always said that I would just try to ignore you.
I’m no doubt looking at a ban for this, but to be honest I spend far too much time on this forum anyway.
So fuck off you tiresome tedious wind up merchant bellend. You’re a colossal prick who isn’t funny.
@Pancho I’m ready to be banned. Just do it, put me out of my misery and whilst you’re at it put this thread out of it as well.
Click to expand...
Nah, it's funny man. Like r-e-a-l-l-l-l-y funny. This bloke is, admittedly, a bellend, but a hugely entertaining one. How a single person can be so wrong on so many levels and be so convinced they are right that they debase themselves on an internet forum daily is massively amusing. @Nukehasslefan - give it up man, science has proven you wrong on so many levels and you can't come up with a single proveable fact to validate anyof your claims whatsoever.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It means nothing but pretence for so called star distances.
Imaginary triangles and what not.
What do you know about all this stuff?
Click to expand...
So triangles become different when they get bigger - another astounding revelation.
Lefty Frizzell said:
Not sure the hate filled comments getting flung towards @Nukehasslefan are very fair. It just comes over as these people’s heads exploding because they can’t process what he is saying and so they throw their toys out of the pram. They’re only words, they’re not hurting people.
Click to expand...

He is a moron and deserves a lot more than he gets to be honest - people have tried to be decent and fair and he has been an arrogant tosser.
DPTT said:
He’s basically now refuting everything and saying it in a manner that we are all idiots. His demeanour has changed lately and I can understand how people are reacting to him.
Click to expand...

He is going around disliking posts like a petulant child too
Nukehasslefan said:
It means nothing but pretence for so called star distances.
Imaginary triangles and what not.
What do you know about all this stuff?
Click to expand...

I know about triangles - did them in primary school. I can name all the famous types.
 
Last edited:
ned_werby said:
Nah, it's funny man. Like r-e-a-l-l-l-l-y funny. This bloke is, admittedly, a bellend, but a hugely entertaining one. How a single person can be so wrong on so many levels and be so convinced they are right that they debase themselves on an internet forum daily is massively amusing. @Nukehasslefan - give it up man, science has proven you wrong on so many levels and you can't come up with a single proveable fact to validate anyof your claims whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Science has proven me wrong, you say?
Science is Earth and all within it, for us.
A scientist is anyone who explores and tries to make sense of it.
With the stuff I'm arguing, nobody has proven their side to be factual, other than to say it is, based on throwing wiki pages and what not, at me.
I've proved Earth is not a globe we walk upon with water. You can all do this. It's observable, testable and repeatable.

If you lot think it curves over a globe and just stays put then fair enough, you're welcome to it, obviously. I don't share it because I use simple logic to show it's nonsense but that's against the global narrative.
 
Kevj said:
No, but it does substantiate the fundamentals of the mathematics used every day by thousands of engineers across the world who use Newtonian physics with accurate and measurable outcomes. The same principles which determine physics and the behaviour of planets, stars and other celestial bodies and all undertaken using maths which is peer reviewed for accuracy.

You’ve yet to demonstrate competence in any of the theories you’ve put forward or a reasoned argument why the accepted model is wrong. Just words.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but brainwashed bollocks.

It is really hard to prove anything and takes a lot of time and effort putting a reasoned case forward. But you can dismiss anything with just three of four words. You don't even have to back it up.

Penguins, Australia, humus and The Proclaimers, do not exist. Nobody can prove otherwise to me, if I just sit saying bollocks all the time, go on try.
 
taipeisafc said:
So triangles become different when they get bigger - another astounding revelation.
Click to expand...

What do you mean by that?
taipeisafc said:
He is a moron and deserves a lot more than he gets to be honest - people have tried to be decent and fair and he has been an arrogant tosser.
Click to expand...
Look in the mirror.
taipeisafc said:
He is going around disliking posts like a petulant child too
Click to expand...

Disagreeing, not disliking.
taipeisafc said:
I know about triangles - did them in primary school. I can name all the famous types.
Click to expand...
Naming triangles is all well and good but they do not set star distances.
 
taipeisafc said:
I know about triangles - did them in primary school. I can name all the famous types.
Click to expand...
Yes, you think you know about triangles, and I'm sure you will just refer to authority and tell us about these mystical 3 sided shapes. I understand that, it is drummed into us all from childhood and it is easy, the triangle explanation is just handed to you on a plate.

You expect to see a triangle so that is all you see when you look. Your brain ends up hard wired that way. But think about it logically, does it really make sense that triangles have to be 3 sided? If you look at a maple leaf, does that have 3 sides? What about jelly fish, they don't have straight sides at all, yet they want us all to think that so called triangles exist.

It took me years to realise that there are other shapes and I understand that you are not there yet. It can be really hard to think for yourself, and unsee what has been drummed into you. I don't blame you, it is natural to just lap up spoon fed information but when you can free your mind you can break away from this idea that triangles somehow have to have 3 sides. It makes no sense and there is absolutely no proof that all triangles have 3 sides.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
What do you mean by that?

Look in the mirror.


Disagreeing, not disliking.

Naming triangles is all well and good but they do not set star distances.
Click to expand...

why are you so sure you know better than everyone that's ever existed?

Have you not thought you may be mistaken?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I don't. They're your words, not mine.

I can be mistaken about anything in life, just as you can. Have you thought of that?
Click to expand...

by definition if you outright dismiss the history of human learning and understanding and put forward the point that you alone know reality to be different then that's exactly what you're saying.

I think I could be wrong daily. I know I'm not clever. I seed my knowledge to authority on subjects beyond my level of intelligence.
 
taipeisafc said:
Another one who thinks nobody has ever been in space and there are no photos of the earth from space or indeed anything ever taken from space.
Click to expand...

Where are the rockets even going? Surely they don't deny the rocket takes off, do they? Are all these companies doing communications satellites and the like just making models for show to chuck in the bin after the photo is taken?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top