• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

I haven't been provided with anything that works. I've been shown diagrams of magical mysteries that supposedly work.
There is nothing in the so called space vacuum that can orientate a spinning globe in the fashion we've been shown in diagrams.

No, you have been provided with some very basic information which you’ve elected to ignore and respond with words.

So I shall ask again, please provide even a basic calculation which backs up your theory. Not words or dismissive statements.

I’m prepared to be proved wrong and all I need is something from you that can be checked for accuracy against your theory.
 

We're living on a flat surface then. There must be an edge to the flat surface? Correct?
Nope, we can clearly see a lot of Earth's surface that we know of is rough terrain. Some is flat and water is essentially flat and level when unhindered by energy and atmospheric changes.
 
Nobody''s explained how it can work.
You see when a person applies logic to something such as looking at orbits, they realise that anything orbiting around something must be attached or it is flung away into the distance, hence why I used the swing ball analogy.

It seems the Earth revolves around the sun whilst also spinning on a tilted axis, somehow. I'd love to know how that works in itself.

A so called massive sun nearly 1 million miles in diameter with a little Earth spinning around it, as we're told.

How?
How does it work?
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I haven't been provided with anything that works. I've been shown diagrams of magical mysteries that supposedly work.
There is nothing in the so called space vacuum that can orientate a spinning globe in the fashion we've been shown in diagrams.
It certainly does not move around the sun model without wobbling around it by the model.

They do happen but they don't happen with a global set up, meaning no globe is rotating on any axis around a central sun.
The seasons happen because it's the sun that moves, not the Earth.

I thought there wasn't a sun, or stars, or space for that matter?
 
No, you have been provided with some very basic information which you’ve elected to ignore and respond with words.

So I shall ask again, please provide even a basic calculation which backs up your theory. Not words or dismissive statements.

I’m prepared to be proved wrong and all I need is something from you that can be checked for accuracy against your theory.
I can't provide you with any calculations for my theory. I'd be lying if I said I could. I've repeatedly said time and again that it's my hypothesis, not passed off as factual, unlike the global Earth which is passed off as factual without actual proof.
But if its a flat plane it must end at some point?
Who said it was a flat plain?
 
It certainly does not move around the sun model without wobbling around it by the model.
Even your own clips show otherwise. The wobble takes over 25,000 years to do a full cycle, not one year.
There is nothing in the so called space vacuum that can orientate a spinning globe in the fashion we've been shown in diagrams.
There is not a lot to stop it.
 
I can't provide you with any calculations for my theory. I'd be lying if I said I could. I've repeatedly said time and again that it's my hypothesis, not passed off as factual, unlike the global Earth which is passed off as factual without actual proof.

There must be a reason you've come to your hypothesis though. Wouldn't you want to apply some fact checking to it to know you're on the right path.

At least with the fake globe model people have bothered lying for thousands of years and made up some maths that idiots like me can learn in school and wrongly apply.
 
Last edited:
I can't provide you with any calculations for my theory. I'd be lying if I said I could. I've repeatedly said time and again that it's my hypothesis, not passed off as factual, unlike the global Earth which is passed off as factual without actual proof.

Who said it was a flat plain?

Are you able to produce calculations to counter the global earth theory?
 
Even your own clips show otherwise. The wobble takes over 25,000 years to do a full cycle, not one year.
Nope.
The wobble is in the diagram and this is the con job of seasons they tell us is happening because of it. Utter nonsense.

There is not a lot to stop it.
There's not a lot to start anything never mind stop anything.

A vacuum as they tell us would offer nothing for anything. It's just a big load of baloney to make it all appear like it all works as they tell us.
The trouble is people go with it because it's a great story. A total fictional story sold as truth but a great story all the same.

Light year stars. Light speed. Special relativity and general. The list of nonsense is almost endless. The big bang from nothing.
Earth just spinning on a tilt for no reason.
A big ball of fire in a vacuum of space as we're told...but this is a special fire...it's nuclear fusion. What is nuclear fusion? Nobody has a clue but nobody needs to have a clue other than those who pass the story and made up equations to pass it off as reality.


I could go on....but...well, you know.
There must be a reason you've come to your hypothesis though. Wouldn't you want to apply some fact checking to it to know you're on the right path.

At least with the fake globe model people have bothered lying for thousands of years and made up some maths that idiots like me can learn in school and wrongly apply.
Nah, I'm fine in how I'm going and you're welcome to the globe model.
Are you able to produce calculations to counter the global earth theory?
No. I can't produce calculations to counteract fictional calculations for a fictional globe.
If I had facts I could but that would mean knowing the entirety of Earth and everything else. That's something I cannot know and will likely never know.

One thing I'll always know...and that is, the Earth is not a rotating globe that people walk upon, sail upon or fly over...and so on.
 
Last edited:
Nope.
The wobble is in the diagram and this is the con job of seasons they tell us is happening because of it. Utter nonsense.


There's not a lot to start anything never mind stop anything.

A vacuum as they tell us would offer nothing for anything. It's just a big load of baloney to make it all appear like it all works as they tell us.
The trouble is people go with it because it's a great story. A total fictional story sold as truth but a great story all the same.

Light year stars. Light speed. Special relativity and general. The list of nonsense is almost endless. The big bang from nothing.
Earth just spinning on a tilt for no reason.
A big ball of fire in a vacuum of space as we're told...but this is a special fire...it's nuclear fusion. What is nuclear fusion? Nobody has a clue but nobody needs to have a clue other than those who pass the story and made up equations to pass it off as reality.


I could go on....but...well, you know.

Nah, I'm fine in how I'm going and you're welcome to the globe model.

Do you reckon Einstein just wasted his whole live working on nonsense or was he just a paid actor?
 
Nope.
The wobble is in the diagram and this is the con job of seasons they tell us is happening because of it. Utter nonsense.


There's not a lot to start anything never mind stop anything.

A vacuum as they tell us would offer nothing for anything. It's just a big load of baloney to make it all appear like it all works as they tell us.
The trouble is people go with it because it's a great story. A total fictional story sold as truth but a great story all the same.

Light year stars. Light speed. Special relativity and general. The list of nonsense is almost endless. The big bang from nothing.
Earth just spinning on a tilt for no reason.
A big ball of fire in a vacuum of space as we're told...but this is a special fire...it's nuclear fusion. What is nuclear fusion? Nobody has a clue but nobody needs to have a clue other than those who pass the story and made up equations to pass it off as reality.


I could go on....but...well, you know.

Nah, I'm fine in how I'm going and you're welcome to the globe model.

No. I can't produce calculations to counteract fictional calculations for a fictional globe.
If I had facts I could but that would mean knowing the entirety of Earth and everything else. That's something I cannot know and will likely never know.

One thing I'll always know...and that is, the Earth is not a rotating globe that people walk upon, sail upon or fly over...and so on.

How do you know?
 
Nope.
The wobble is in the diagram and this is the con job of seasons they tell us is happening because of it. Utter nonsense.
Then the model you are so determined is nonsense does not in fact exist. You are seeing something that isn't there and then using it to disprove something you dont understand. The accepted model does not claim an annual wobble nor does not require one in order to explain the seasons.
 
Do you reckon Einstein just wasted his whole live working on nonsense or was he just a paid actor?
The E=mc2 man?
Energy equals mass x the speed of light squared.
Anyone any idea what this means?

The speed of light, squared.

A paid something. What exactly, I'm not sure.

Dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bull****...

The theory of relativity.
How do you know?
This is where simple experiments using low pressure come in very handy.
It's about going down the simple route and seeing real life effects to scupper the utter garbage spouted for a so called vacuum of space and all the gunk associated with that storyline.
 
Last edited:
The E=mc2 man?
Energy equals mass x the speed of light squared.
Anyone any idea what this means?

The speed of light, squared.

A paid something. What exactly, I'm not sure.

Dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bull****...

The theory of relativity.

This is where simple experiments using low pressure comes in very handy.
It's about going down the simple route and seeing real life effects to scupper the utter garbage spouted for a so called vacuum of space and all the gunk associated with that storyline.

how does it fell to be categorically the smartest man who's ever lived?
 
Then the model you are so determined is nonsense does not in fact exist. You are seeing something that isn't there and then using it to disprove something you dont understand. The accepted model does not claim an annual wobble nor does not require one in order to explain the seasons.
Oh it's there. The model shows it.
The problem is, people are coaxed into believing the Earth spins on a tilt and that tilt just stays the same around the sun model but i clearly does not by the diagram, yet the con job is in the pretence that you can walk around a light holding a globe at an angle and it will naturally stay the same.

the reality of it is in holding the globe at an angle in front of you and sidestepping around the light.

People need to try that and see what the reality would be in terms of model wise.


There would be no reality in a so called space vacuum of anything orbiting anything so that matters little.
 
The E=mc2 man?
Energy equals mass x the speed of light squared.
Anyone any idea what this means?

The speed of light, squared.

A paid something. What exactly, I'm not sure.

Dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bull****...

The theory of relativity.

This is where simple experiments using low pressure come in very handy.
It's about going down the simple route and seeing real life effects to scupper the utter garbage spouted for a so called vacuum of space and all the gunk associated with that storyline.

Please prove you’re using low pressure. This is measurable, so you must have measured and recorded the correlation between pressure and whatever it was you exerted the pressure on.
 
The E=mc2 man?
Energy equals mass x the speed of light squared.
Anyone any idea what this means?

The speed of light, squared.

A paid something. What exactly, I'm not sure.

Dazzle them with brilliance and baffle them with bull****...

The theory of relativity.
I always said that I would just try to ignore you.
I’m no doubt looking at a ban for this, but to be honest I spend far too much time on this forum anyway.
So fuck off you tiresome tedious wind up merchant bellend. You’re a colossal prick who isn’t funny.
@Pancho I’m ready to be banned. Just do it, put me out of my misery and whilst you’re at it put this thread out of it as well.
 
Back
Top