• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Nukehasslefan said:
It's got nothing to do with 26,000 years. It's supposedly one revolution around a central sun with the tilted axis moving in and out. If this was really the case then it kills off the polaris being on point with the north pole as we're told or if it gets told to be on point then it cannot change direction around a central sun, so it cannot be offered both ways.

I mean its all baloney but this type of stuff just shows it up for what it is.

So you think you can watch a point of light overhead and then watch it move down and that tells you you're on a tilted spinning ball? Seriously?

It tells you nothing of the sort other than to follow the diagrams set up for you to believe it marries up for you.
Click to expand...
26,000 years is the wobble which you are insisting happens in one year according to the taught model. Watch your clip again and it explains this.
 

The Snockerty Friddle said:
26,000 years is the wobble which you are insisting happens in one year according to the taught model. Watch your clip again and it explains this.
Click to expand...
No. I'm on about the wobble that would have to happen if those seasons were down to a spinning globe on a tilt and going around a centralised sun, as we're shown.

Let me make this more clear.

If you were to place a stick through a swing ball at an angle so the top of the stick faces into the swing ball pole and swung it around that pole, the stick would still point to that pole from the top, all the way around it. We can assume the pole is the centralised sun.

But because this wouldn't solve the seasons argument they had to change it to a wobble but it makes no sense for something to do that.
It makes no sense for it to spin around a sun in any way but that's another argument.

The big con job is when we get told to get a globe and tilt it then walk around a table or light but few people don't realise how they are twisting the globe as they move around the light.
It appears legit until you actually take a good look at it.

It's utter nonsense.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
No. I'm on about the wobble that would have to happen if those seasons were down to a spinning globe on a tilt and going around a centralised sun, as we're shown.

Let me make this more clear.

If you were to place a stick through a swing ball at an angle so the top of the stick faces into the swing ball pole and swung it around that pole, the stick would still point to that pole from the top, all the way around it. We can assume the pole is the centralised sun.

But because this wouldn't solve the seasons argument they had to change it to a wobble but it makes no sense for something to do that.
It makes no sense for it to spin around a sun in any way but that's another argument.

The big con job is when we get told to get a globe and tilt it then walk around a table or light but few people don't realise how they are twisting the globe as they move around the light.
It appears legit until you actually take a good look at it.

It's utter nonsense.
Click to expand...

What do you think causes seasons in the ice dome world ?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Changing angle of reflection as the arcing carbon moves up and down the centre.
Click to expand...

Seems a bit mad that in the northern hemisphere countries we can get bitter cold winters, the equatorial countries stay at the same temp all year round then the southern hemisphere would get summer conditions, yet the heat source is closer to the northern countries.
All powered by reflections as well to heat up and area thousands and thousands of miles away.
 
What A Waster said:
Seems a bit mad that in the northern hemisphere countries we can get bitter cold winters, the equatorial countries stay at the same temp all year round then the southern hemisphere would get summer conditions, yet the heat source is closer to the northern countries.
All powered by reflections as well to heat up and area thousands and thousands of miles away.
Click to expand...
There is no southern hemisphere.

the equatorial countries as you go with are simply those countries that are placed around the circle where the changed angle does not alter the reflection to that part, only the closer and farther parts of the gradient towards and away from the central energy.
 
What A Waster said:
Seems a bit mad that in the northern hemisphere countries we can get bitter cold winters, the equatorial countries stay at the same temp all year round then the southern hemisphere would get summer conditions, yet the heat source is closer to the northern countries.
All powered by reflections as well to heat up and area thousands and thousands of miles away.
Click to expand...
🤔

You must be logged on to see media items
 
Nukehasslefan said:
There is no southern hemisphere.

the equatorial countries as you go with are simply those countries that are placed around the circle where the changed angle does not alter the reflection to that part, only the closer and farther parts of the gradient towards and away from the central energy.
Click to expand...

Yip, yip Thora Hird
 
DPTT said:
Can you explain this further🤷‍♂️
I literally have no idea what you mean
Click to expand...
Ask the relevant questions and I'll try and answer.
It's up to you to see if you can get something from it. It's all about putting your mind to what I'm saying and trying to concentrate on that rather than putting up a shield.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Ask the relevant questions and I'll try and answer.
It's up to you to see if you can get something from it. It's all about putting your mind to what I'm saying and trying to concentrate on that rather than putting up a shield.
Click to expand...
What????😂

You mentioned arcing carbon moving up and down the centre?

what is arcing carbon and the centre of what?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
There is no southern hemisphere.

the equatorial countries as you go with are simply those countries that are placed around the circle where the changed angle does not alter the reflection to that part, only the closer and farther parts of the gradient towards and away from the central energy.
Click to expand...

Because heat rises would it not always be warmer in the northen countries as they're closer to the centre of the dome shaped ice, so there's more space for the heat to gather in the northern countries. Especially if the heat is coming from the central energy crystals.
Why at certain times of the year would it be pushed away from the centre and then others it isn't?

What's arcing carbon? Can't find anything on Google
 
Last edited:
What A Waster said:
Because heat rises would it not always be warmer in the northen countries as they're closer to the centre of the dome shaped ice, so there's more space for the heat to gather in the northern cointries. Especially if the heat is coming from the central energy crystals.
Why at certain times of the year would it be pushed away from the centre and then others it isn't?
Click to expand...
It's angled reflection from the dome and back to us, from the central energy source.


What A Waster said:
What's arcing carbon? Can't find anything on Google
Click to expand...
Think of a super carbon.
Think in terms of an old carbon arc searchlight then try and visualise a super carbon on a bigger scale arcing within.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
It's angled reflection from the dome and back to us, from the central energy source.



Think of a super carbon.
Think in terms of an old carbon arc searchlight then try and visualise a super carbon on a bigger scale arcing within.
Click to expand...

Now I'm no scientist, but doesn't a concave mirror reflect light from whichever angle towards a central point. For your central energy source to reflect heat and light from the centre out towards the edges the dome would have to be convex.
How can it do that?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top