Put a flat earthier into space

[nahwee]

I'm not OK with it at all. I feel like it is my moral duty to educate those who would spread misinformation that might confuse the issue for other people.

This kind of thing, if left unchecked, slows down the progress of human understanding.

If even one additional person reading this thread ends up thinking "actually, there might be something in this flat earth thing" then it has already spread to one extra person too many.

Do you really think that what he posts, and the way he posts, would make anyone contemplate if the earth is flat or not?

If he posted his ``musings`` on a Flat Earth Forum he’d get a ban for bringing their name into disrupute!

 

[fyl2u]

Do you really think that what he posts, and the way he posts, would make anyone contemplate if the earth is flat or not?

If he posted his ``musings`` on a Flat Earth Forum he’d get a ban for bringing their name into disrupute!

Well, you never know. At some point he's seen, heard or read something to make him think it could be true.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Any images you see you just say are doctored

To be fair, up to now, that's all I've ever seen.
I'm waiting for some of you to actually put up some real pictures.

I'm not. I'm talking about a wave of increased barometric pressure - air.

You were talking about the ripples on water moving out and back in.
Never mind, it's irrelevant anyway as it proves nothing either way.

How?

It should be plainly obvious, how.

Exactly. Why would it if the earth was’nt a globe.

That’s what I’m saying.

My first sentence explains it.

I’m not talking about water, I’m talking about a wave of air pressure, recorded on barographs.

The confusion arose when you posted:

`` If you sit in a bath and smash your fist into the water you will move it away in all directions and it will come right back to equalise the area you forced away.``


If you’d really like to know answers and explanations you could easily find all this information yourself.

I could help, but I won’t. Not when you dismiss everything as ``another piece of history that’s added in as some proof of a globe``

As you say yourself `` You're entitled to think that. I'm ok with it.``

Ok, so you believe an explosion sent a pressure wave to one area and left the rest untouched by it and that confirms a globe to you because you buy into the story....right?

You can own that if you want. I think you know my thoughts on it.

 

[taipeisafc]

Maybe taking a bit more notice of why light is the end product of sound, might help.

You really are an ignorant pillock. Light is the end product of sound FFS - utter drivel.

 

[fyl2u]

It should be plainly obvious, how.

It should be plainly obvious why a circular wave starting in the very centre of a circular container bouncing off the circular border comes back off the border in a circular pattern that converges back in the starting position.

I mean, you can demonstrate this very easily in your own home with a simple glass of water by just dipping your finger in it and allowing a water droplet to drop into the very centre of the surface of the water.

 

[Baloo]

Social distancing

We will reach a point where the risk is reduced for everybody, not just the first couple of at risk groups. Bryan's Dad has done nothing wrong - he's right to be fat is actually greater than Grandmas right to break the law. Rules will be relaxed long before we get to that point. Hopefully she...

www.readytogo.net

He couldn’t even explain his own bizarre analogy about social distancing

 

[Kevj]

@Nukehasslefan,

Care to provide your wisdom for this article?

You must be logged on to see external links

Actual measurable scientific practice put into place to prove the date of an object with origins outside of earth. A test which can be repeated in a number of locations and verified beyond doubt.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

It should be plainly obvious why a circular wave starting in the very centre of a circular container bouncing off the circular border comes back off the border in a circular pattern that converges back in the starting position.

I mean, you can demonstrate this very easily in your own home with a simple glass of water by just dipping your finger in it and allowing a water droplet to drop into the very centre of the surface of the water.

But this isn't what you're saying.

@Nukehasslefan,

Care to provide your wisdom for this article?

You must be logged on to see external links

Actual measurable scientific practice put into place to prove the date of an object with origins outside of earth. A test which can be repeated in a number of locations and verified beyond doubt.

I have absolutely nothing to say about this other than....well, I'm sure you can guess.

 

[qixman]

Do you have any pictures of jupiter spinning? The moon you see does have what looks like craters on it. But are they really craters or something else?


I'm waiting for images of jupiter from some of you lot.

You're entitled to think that. I'm ok with it.

You must be logged on to see media items

between 16 and 18 mins. Of course even when presented with evidence you will ignore it.

 

[fyl2u]

But this isn't what you're saying.

Yes it is. My exact words were:

"Whereas if the border were circular, with Krakatoa (or the stone being dropped) at the exact centre of the circle, then the wave would bounce back still circle-shaped and still with Krakatoa at the centre, shrinking back to the source as it went along."

 

[Nukehasslefan]

You must be logged on to see media items

between 16 and 18 mins. Of course even when presented with evidence you will ignore it.

Where did you observe this from?

Yes it is. My exact words were:

"Whereas if the border were circular, with Krakatoa (or the stone being dropped) at the exact centre of the circle, then the wave would bounce back still circle-shaped and still with Krakatoa at the centre, shrinking back to the source as it went along."

So you think a pressure wave will come right back in a circular wave back to the centre?

 

[fyl2u]

Where did you observe this from?

So you think a pressure wave will come right back in a circular wave back to the centre?

Only if the "cell world" (or flat world) were perfectly circular and Krakatoa was "the north pole" in the exact centre of the surface of the world.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

This Krakatoa eruption is supposed to have sent a pressure wave around a supposed globe over 7 times.
3 times it hits the antipodal point and comes right back to the volcano, as we're told.

And you argue it can only happen on a globe where this supposed antipodal point to cause a pressure wave to come back, is senseless.
Why isn't the pressure wave following a curvature?

It makes much more sense for any pressure wave to hit a concave barrier and come back, not a global set up.

Only if the "cell world" (or flat world) were perfectly circular and Krakatoa was "the north pole" in the exact centre of the surface of the world.

And you think a spinning globe offers credence to this story, obviously.
It makes no sense at all.

 

[fyl2u]

This Krakatoa eruption is supposed to have sent a pressure wave around a supposed globe over 7 times.
3 times it hits the antipodal point and comes right back to the volcano, as we're told.

And you argue it can only happen on a globe where this supposed antipodal point to cause a pressure wave to come back, is senseless.
Why isn't the pressure wave following a curvature?

The wave did follow a curvature.

And the timings of the wave going back over the places it had already been observed were perfectly in time for the circumference of the globe given the known speed of sound.

A number of people tried to take the opportunity to determine whether the world were a shape other than a globe using the readings they were taking, and all of them only managed to explain their readings with the globe model. No other shape would explain their observations.

It makes much more sense for any pressure wave to hit a concave barrier and come back, not a global set up.

It might, if Krakatoa were at the very centre (north pole) of a circular "cell world". But even then, you would be able to tell by the difference in the rhythm of the readings in different places.

And you think a spinning globe offers credence to this story, obviously.
It makes no sense at all.

It's the only way the observations DID make sense.

If the world were any other shape but a spheroid, the observations would have been very different.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

The wave did follow a curvature.

As the story goes.

And the timings of the wave going back over the places it had already been observed were perfectly in time for the circumference of the globe given the known speed of sound.

A number of people tried to take the opportunity to determine whether the world were a shape other than a globe using the readings they were taking, and all of them only managed to explain their readings with the globe model. No other shape would explain their observations.

A globe model makes absolutely no sense where this is concerned.
You're trying to put forward a pressure wave just going all around a supposed globe and back to the point of origin, 7 times.
The blast should've dissipated into the atmosphere not followed a supposed path around a globe.

It really makes no sense.
If you buy into it then fine. I don't and I promise you I won't be buying into any of it no matter how much you try to champion it through whatever channels you did.

It might, if Krakatoa were at the very centre (north pole) of a circular "cell world". But even then, you would be able to tell by the difference in the rhythm of the readings in different places.

It's as simple as this. A wave is a wave, whether it's a atmospheric or water or whatever.
It has it's epicentre/energy/force application and spreads out after exploding and imploding (filling the void).
If there's no barrier then the pressure will dissipate.
On a ball this pressure would dissipate up and away from the epicentre, not around it.
An explosion pushes away atmosphere by force. It creates an unequal pressure which has to be equalised and this is where the pressure comes right back after initial explosion, to fill the void.

It's the only way the observations DID make sense.

If the world were any other shape but a spheroid, the observations would have been very different.

Fair enough if you go with that. I don't accept it at all.

 

[DaveH]

You really are an ignorant pillock. Light is the end product of sound FFS - utter drivel.

But it is it is it is, think about it.

Imagine if you have a big hole in the side of your house. It lets in lots of light and sounds like so called bird song from outside. Now put a window in the hole and you will hear any sounds massively reduced because the glass blocks the sound and that is why your room goes dark too.

Now get a ruler and a pen. Draw a line on the glass and stand with it lined up to the horizon. Take a couple of steps closer and repeatedly beat your face of the window, then it will make complete sense.

 

[taipeisafc]

The wave did follow a curvature.

And the timings of the wave going back over the places it had already been observed were perfectly in time for the circumference of the globe given the known speed of sound.

A number of people tried to take the opportunity to determine whether the world were a shape other than a globe using the readings they were taking, and all of them only managed to explain their readings with the globe model. No other shape would explain their observations.




It might, if Krakatoa were at the very centre (north pole) of a circular "cell world". But even then, you would be able to tell by the difference in the rhythm of the readings in different places.



It's the only way the observations DID make sense.

If the world were any other shape but a spheroid, the observations would have been very different.

You must be logged on to see external links

If he can teach himself to read big words this explains it all quite nicely.

 

[Hend79]

To be fair, up to now, that's all I've ever seen.
I'm waiting for some of you to actually put up some real pictures.

So you would believe a photo taken by random people on here but not by scientists and astronomers who have provided evidence of this for years? Clueless clown

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But it is it is it is, think about it.

Imagine if you have a big hole in the side of your house. It lets in lots of light and sounds like so called bird song from outside. Now put a window in the hole and you will hear any sounds massively reduced because the glass blocks the sound and that is why your room goes dark too.

Now get a ruler and a pen. Draw a line on the glass and stand with it lined up to the horizon. Take a couple of steps closer and repeatedly beat your face of the window, then it will make complete sense.

Of course if you look at it like that then it's obvious you won't understand it.

 

[What A Waster]

Of course if you look at it like that then it's obvious you won't understand it.

class