• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

Wrong.
All known science has proof and if it offers no proof then it gets questioned.
If no proof can still be offered then it gets to be not accepted until it can.
As for me with my musings. They are just that but are so because of how I've deduced a possibility from small experiments. I offer is, not as factual but as my musing which I expect nobody to go along with and fully expect the usual attempted ridicule.
You and others keep coming back with it time and time again as if it lends you credence to the global Earth.

You need to offer proof because you're offering the global Earth as fact and you have to offer proof of it without appeals to authority which most are doing...including yourself.


Facts for what?



So your reliance is entirely on the storyline without having any proof for yourself.
That's fair enough. Most people do this.

Evidence the Earth not being a spinning globe is there in everyone's face. I've mentioned it many many times.
Can you offer any for the spinning globe you believe in, without appealing to authority?
ive sailed round the world and not fallen off, so aye
 

So why are religious figures etc pushing for the globe theory then?

Why are they pushing for people to follow their religion?
What’s so wrong about your flat Earth (apart from the obvious 😂)
It's not about what's wrong with my Earth musing it's about what's wrong with the global indoctrinated model.
ive sailed round the world and not fallen off, so aye
Why would you fall off?
 
Why are they pushing for people to follow their religion?

It's not about what's wrong with my Earth musing it's about what's wrong with the global indoctrinated model.

Why would you fall off?
You’re not answering any questions here matey like.

A question from a question suggests you don’t have an answer.

Try and answer why religion is hiding that we are indeed a flat earth?
 
You’re not answering any questions here matey like.

A question from a question suggests you don’t have an answer.

Try and answer why religion is hiding that we are indeed a flat earth?
I never said religion was hiding a flat Earth.

If you make stuff up to suit yourself and attribute it to me and expect an answer, then I'll answer it with a question.
 
I never said religion was hiding a flat Earth.

If you make stuff up to suit yourself and attribute it to me and expect an answer, then I'll answer it with a question.
But I don’t think I am making stuff up though just like you🤷‍♂️
You mentioned Religion as a reason and am curious why you think that?
 
Ok let's go. Show me how the height is changing and how it proves a supposed spinning globe.

How?

You shouldn't really need to be asking that.
Try religion.

Anything can be drilled into the mindset of people who don't know any better.
How would the average Joe or Jane know what it was they were living on or who their god is?
Reliance on stories.

The issue then becomes which of the stories carry a truth or some truth or none at all?
I’ll take it slowly. Do you accept that it gets dark as the day progresses and we call this dark period night?
 
I asked why we would hide the flat Earth and you said “Try Religion”
Am curious as to why you said that?


You implied it, not me.

You said: So why are religious figures etc pushing for the globe theory then?

I answered with: Why are they pushing for people to follow their religion?

I’ll take it slowly. Do you accept that it gets dark as the day progresses and we call this dark period night?
Absolutely.
 
You implied it, not me.

You said: So why are religious figures etc pushing for the globe theory then?

I answered with: Why are they pushing for people to follow their religion?



Absolutely.
Good. Do you also accept that if there are no clouds during this period we call night, we see things in the sky that we call stars?
 
You implied it, not me.

You said: So why are religious figures etc pushing for the globe theory then?

I answered with: Why are they pushing for people to follow their religion?



Absolutely.
Eh, I only asked about religion as you brought it up first😂

My first question did not mention religion at all🤷‍♂️
 
Good. Do you also accept that if there are no clouds during this period we call night, we see things in the sky that we call stars?
Points of light that are told to be stars, yes.
Eh, I only asked about religion as you brought it up first😂

My first question did not mention religion at all🤷‍♂️
I did bring it up but I never used it for a flat Earth which you implied.

You asked: So since it’s been accepted by 99.9% of the population throughout the many centuries that the earth is a globe, how do you think these scholars and groups of authority have managed from day one to fool us into thinking this way and why.

I replied:
You shouldn't really need to be asking that.
Try religion.

Anything
can be drilled into the mindset of people who don't know any better.
How would the average Joe or Jane know what it was they were living on or who their god is?
Reliance on stories.

The issue then becomes which of the stories carry a truth or some truth or none at all?
 
Last edited:
Points of light that are told to be stars, yes.

I did bring it up but I never used it for a flat Earth which you implied.

You asked: So since it’s been accepted by 99.9% of the population throughout the many centuries that the earth is a globe, how do you think these scholars and groups of authority have managed from day one to fool us into thinking this way and why.

I replied:
You shouldn't really need to be asking that.
Try religion.

Anything
can be drilled into the mindset of people who don't know any better.
How would the average Joe or Jane know what it was they were living on or who their god is?
Reliance on stories.

The issue then becomes which of the stories carry a truth or some truth or none at all?
So you haven’t really answered my question then?
Fair enough 👍
 
The fact there are 1,000 replies to this show just how bad the education system is. I’m embarrassed some of these fuckers are eligible to vote. And breed.
 
I believe I have based on what you offered as a question.

If you want to elaborate on it then go for it.
It’s been accepted by the vast majority for a few thousand years that the earth is a globe right?

if it’s not and what you say is indeed correct, why have the hid the truth for so long?

And why have the creators designed your “musings” so that it does indeed suggest that the earth is a globe?
Am thinking how the stars move on your projection which does indeed portray the “illusion” that the earth is spinning.
 
It’s been accepted by the vast majority for a few thousand years that the earth is a globe right?
I don't know, has it?
if it’s not and what you say is indeed correct, why have the hid the truth for so long?
I could give all kinds of answers as potentials and none may be correct in terms of provable by me.
I could say, control and spoils of putting out fakery to gain reward of taxpayers money by adding billions to a hollywood set up costing millions.

Or maybe we're just being coaxed into a belief we are trapped on a ball and the only way off is via those at the top providing space transport...or basically so we simply believe we are on a ball that's basically got nowhere else to explore.

No need to argue this. You asked and I gave you my thoughts on some possibilities.

Now we can go back to religion and ask the very same questions.

Why?
Do you believe in a god or a religion and if so...why?
Why do masses of people believe in one religion...one god and yet others believe in another and their god?


Is one side right and the rest wrong. Are they all right or are they all potentially following a set out narrative of teaching from a young age and basically canvassing in older age?

People argue religion like they've been sent directly by their god, it seems.
People also argue for a global Earth like they've actually physically saw it for themselves...and yet will not accept they've been schooled into it.
And why have the creators designed your “musings” so that it does indeed suggest that the earth is a globe? Am thinking how the stars move on your projection which does indeed portray the “illusion” that the earth is spinning.
Maybe that's how the cell has to work to sustain it's longevity, however long that is.
What keeps a cell alive in our bodies or an animals, insects or fish....etc?


 
I don't know, has it?

I could give all kinds of answers as potentials and none may be correct in terms of provable by me.
I could say, control and spoils of putting out fakery to gain reward of taxpayers money by adding billions to a hollywood set up costing millions.

Or maybe we're just being coaxed into a belief we are trapped on a ball and the only way off is via those at the top providing space transport...or basically so we simply believe we are on a ball that's basically got nowhere else to explore.

No need to argue this. You asked and I gave you my thoughts on some possibilities.

Now we can go back to religion and ask the very same questions.

Why?
Do you believe in a god or a religion and if so...why?
Why do masses of people believe in one religion...one god and yet others believe in another and their god?


Is one side right and the rest wrong. Are they all right or are they all potentially following a set out narrative of teaching from a young age and basically canvassing in older age?

People argue religion like they've been sent directly by their god, it seems.
People also argue for a global Earth like they've actually physically saw it for themselves...and yet will not accept they've been schooled into it.

Maybe that's how the cell has to work to sustain it's longevity, however long that is.
What keeps a cell alive in our bodies or an animals, insects or fish....etc?
Hollywood didn’t exist 3 thousand years ago though did it?
The globe model was accepted by most thousands of years ago based on observation and mathematics.

I do believe their is s god but I also believe the universe is very very different to what we know now.
And religion has proven to be very dangerous
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tex
Just done a quick google, and it says with a viewing field of 60° or wider you'd be able to detect the curvature of the earth from 35k feet.

Weather balloons can go as high as 24 miles before they burst.

You must be logged on to see media items


So here's quite an easy experiment for the Flatties to do to disprove a globe. Send a weather balloon up with a camera, doesn't even have to be a fish eye lens.

Them divvies could easily start a go fund me for the best camera and balloon available.
How have they not done this already?

@Nukehasslefan
Any thoughts why the flatties/globe deniers haven't tried this out?
 
Hollywood didn’t exist 3 thousand years ago though did it?
Not that I know of but then again I'm going off the picture shows we were all handed out through TV and media.
Thousands of years ago I don't think the majority would've given a monkeys about Earth shape. Do you?

The globe model was accepted by most thousands of years ago based on observation and mathematics.
What are you basing this on?

I do believe their is s god but I also believe the universe is very very different to what we know now.
Have you ever seen this god?
What compelled you to believe in this god?


And religion has proven to be very dangerous
It isn't about whether it's dangerous to have different gods it's about whether those gods are there in the first place, in whichever form people believe.

You could say alternate theories are dangerous.
If some people are unstable and do not like someone going against the grain they can become violent and what not.

Same as this religion stuff.
However it does not solve the issue of...which is a reality?


It requires proof if it's cast out as factual.
Ridicule or a punch in the face, is not a proof.
@Nukehasslefan
Any thoughts why the flatties/globe deniers haven't tried this out?
What is this a proof of?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top