• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England vs India (fourth test) The Oval

The thing that strikes me with Hameed is that he's not really in control of his gears yet. He's a talented young batsman and he can score quickly - he isn't a Sibley, who simply doesn't have the shots. But he can't yet control when that happens yet. Will come, but for today I'd rather he blocked like this than gave it away like he almost did.
 

He tried a slog sweep and got dropped, I think he’s been sensible take time out of the game and keep wickets in hand. Root will naturally score quickly

i thought he struggled there personally

not an issue as I’m not fussed but I don’t think it was overly deliberate I don’t think he knew how to score runs
 
3 boundaries, all by Burns early in the day


Aye just bollocks by the usual suspects in the cricket media

its deliberate by them too as they know thats how cricket works too, almost getting their criticism in early

Vaughan is appalling for it, bores my tits off when he’s in this mode. Warne likewise.

Imagine Vaughan would be spewing on his sarnies if we were 150-5 at lunch having tried to heave Jadeja over the top
Irrelevant now. More likely they’ll play for the draw and lose

That’s the spirit :lol:
 
i thought he struggled there personally

not an issue as I’m not fussed but I don’t think it was overly deliberate I don’t think he knew how to score runs
Yeah he can get bogged down, did it last game as well.

Down to Root now though, if he’s batting at the end I think we’ll have got close
 
There’s no logic in “going for it” in the first session of the day. England win is - and was after lunch Day 4 - a very tall order. A record breaking chase. Wickets in hand are what it’s all about up until tea to safeguard the series with a draw - and if a steady accumulation puts us in with a good chance after that, take a view. A draw wouldn’t be a bad result here given the implications it has for the series.
Same pundits saying they should go for it would then criticise them for playing the shots if they got out. Easiest job in the world.
 
I don’t think that’s a bad session at all to be honest. It’s day 5, they are going to take the odd wicket, we basically made 2 mistakes in 2 hours (run out and the Hameed drop). Anyone thinking we would come out today and comfortably knock it off are in dreamland. Get to tea still with a sniff and 6 or 7 wickets left, then you can really have a go with the likes of bairstow and moeen.
 
I don’t think that’s a bad session at all to be honest. It’s day 5, they are going to take the odd wicket, we basically made 2 mistakes in 2 hours (run out and the Hameed drop). Anyone thinking we would come out today and comfortably knock it off are in dreamland. Get to tea still with a sniff and 6 or 7 wickets left, then you can really have a go with the likes of bairstow and moeen.

My thoughts in a nutshell, preserve wickets first and foremost. Yes the pitch isn’t doing much but that’s looking likely be the case after tea too. It’d have been no use going gung ho now and being 80 or so off the target at tea with the tail in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don’t think that’s a bad session at all to be honest. It’s day 5, they are going to take the odd wicket, we basically made 2 mistakes in 2 hours (run out and the Hameed drop). Anyone thinking we would come out today and comfortably knock it off are in dreamland. Get to tea still with a sniff and 6 or 7 wickets left, then you can really have a go with the likes of bairstow and moeen.

yeah fair play

I think the malan one is a big blow mind, just a gift.

you want them to bowl them out
 
problem with all the commentators playing in the same era is that just hear the same stories of the same players

never any mention on anything of much relevance from the period when England have been incredibly successful
The problem with that is Trott,Tres,Colly coaching as I think is Bell.

Strauss was head honcho, cook still playing.

Pietersen,Swann,Vaughan are bellends. Flintoff and Harrison aren't great and have media roles elsewhere.

So that leaves someone like Prior who I don't think would necessarily be great.

Perhaps for the reasons you say is why Karthik was enjoyable for many.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top