• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state with some features missing, normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Put a flat earthier into space

taipeisafc said:
YOU CANNOT HAVE A LINEAR DISTANCE MEASURED IN MILES SQUARED YOU MORON......SQUARED IS FOR AREA.
Click to expand...
And your globe is exactly that, it's not linear but any direction on it is 8 inches per mile squared.


taipeisafc said:
The first thing you can find with our Earth curvature calculator is the exact distance between you and the horizon.
Click to expand...

The horizon is a theoretical line. It's meaningless for any calculations for anything.
We're talking about a supposed Earth curve based on a globe being 24,000 miles in circumference.
The drop for part of that would be very close to 8 inches per mile squared.
It wasn't a flat Earther that came to that conclusion. It was global storytellers with authority.


taipeisafc said:
You only need to know two values: your eyesight level (in other words, the distance between your eyes and mean sea level – assuming you are looking out to sea) and the radius of the Earth. Input these numbers into the following equation:

a = √[(r + h)² - r²]
where:

  • a – Distance to the horizon;
  • h – Eyesight level above mean sea level, and
  • r – Earth's radius, equal to 3959 miles or 6371 km.
This equation can be derived using the
You must be logged on to see external links
. You can try to derive it yourself – it is not that hard!

Distance is in metres / miles / km etc. You really have no clue yet are so arrogant about it.
Click to expand...
The distance between your eyes and means ea level?
What's that supposed to show, other than your eyes meet a theoretical line we call the horizon.
The potential distance is a few miles of real vision before it's obscured by atmospheric mass build up.


8 inches per mile squared.
 

Nukehasslefan said:
And your globe is exactly that, it's not linear but any direction on it is 8 inches per mile squared.




The horizon is a theoretical line. It's meaningless for any calculations for anything.
We're talking about a supposed Earth curve based on a globe being 24,000 miles in circumference.
The drop for part of that would be very close to 8 inches per mile squared.
It wasn't a flat Earther that came to that conclusion. It was global storytellers with authority.



The distance between your eyes and means ea level?
What's that supposed to show, other than your eyes meet a theoretical line we call the horizon.
The potential distance is a few miles of real vision before it's obscured by atmospheric mass build up.


8 inches per mile squared.
Click to expand...
If you keep repeating something that is wrong it doesn't make it right - just makes you look even stupider than you are. Your utter bollocks is getting tiresome, and I wish I had followed my own advice to only take the piss out if you in future. Ignorant clown.

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
8 inches per mile squared.
Click to expand...
Why squared?
The scientists say 8 inches per mile that's what you need to disprove?
If a table in your house slopes 1 inch per foot and its 6 foot long how much will it slope overall?
Do that test, it's the same test you can do at kielder.
Or show me some published science (that you don't believe) that says its 8 inches per mile squared, why the fuck would you square a slope 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️😂😂😂
 
taipeisafc said:
If you keep repeating something that is wrong it doesn't make it right - just makes you look even stupider than you are. Your utter bollocks is getting tiresome, and I wish I had followed my own advice to only take the piss out if you in future. Ignorant clown.
Click to expand...
If you keep saying it's wrong then I'll repeat it.
Stop getting wound up and if it becomes too much for you I suggest you ignore me.
That's the best advice I can give you in this scenario.
 
legend7 said:
Why squared?
The scientists say 8 inches per mile that's what you need to disprove?
If a table in your house slopes 1 inch per foot and its 6 foot long how much will it slope overall?
Do that test, it's the same test you can do at kielder.
Or show me some published science (that you don't believe) that says its 8 inches per mile squared, why the fuck would you square a slope 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️😂😂😂
Click to expand...

Cos it is all made up bollocks....sorry musings. He can barely count never mind do mathematics.
 
legend7 said:
Why squared?
Click to expand...
Because it curves down and away if it's the globe we're told.
1 mile = (approx) 8 inches and then from that vantage point the drop to 2 miles is squared. 2 miles squared x 8 inches = 32 inches....meaning 2x 8 x 2 = 32 inches.
So at two miles distance from your vantage point your curvature drop would be 32 inches...and so on.
legend7 said:
The scientists say 8 inches per mile that's what you need to disprove?
Click to expand...

It is 8 inches per mile for one mile only. 1 mile farther on meaning it's now 2 miles distant, your curve would be as above...and so on.
legend7 said:
If a table in your house slopes 1 inch per foot and its 6 foot long how much will it slope overall?
Click to expand...

Slopes or curves?
legend7 said:
Do that test, it's the same test you can do at kielder.
Or show me some published science (that you don't believe) that says its 8 inches per mile squared, why the fuck would you square a slope 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️😂😂😂
Click to expand...
All I can do is show you and leave the rest up to you.

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Last edited:
Nukehasslefan said:
Because it curves down and away if it's the globe we're told.
1 mile = (approx) 8 inches and then from that vantage point the drop to 2 miles is squared. 2 miles squared x 8 inches = 32 inches....meaning 2x 8 x 2 = 32 inches.
So at two miles distance from your vantage point your curvature drop would be 32 inches...and so on.


It is 8 inches per mile for one mile only. 1 mile farther on meaning it's now 2 miles distant, your curve would be as above...and so on.


Slopes or curves?

All I can do is show you and leave the rest up to you.

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
So do I do that if I measure my penis when it's curving down, could quote some pretty impressive fall to the birds.
So where is the quote that you're trying to disprove from globe people that say its squared?
That's from one of your nutters
 
His wind up isn't as good recently, it used to draw you in but recently it just stinks of desperation.

Squaring things for reasons he cant even explain, he was asked a direct question on his qualifications cue waffle, waffle, avoid the question.
I do my own experiments but I like to start with false conditions to get the results I want. Describe each step of your experiment more waffle, change the subject and avoid the question.
Giant domes and ice walls he's never seen but Einstein was a storyteller.
:lol:
 
Northern Boarders said:
His wind up isn't as good recently, it used to draw you in but recently it just stinks of desperation.

Squaring things for reasons he cant even explain, he was asked a direct question on his qualifications cue waffle, waffle, avoid the question.
I do my own experiments but I like to start with false conditions to get the results I want. Describe each step of your experiment more waffle, change the subject and avoid the question.
Giant domes and ice walls he's never seen but Einstein was a storyteller.
:lol:
Click to expand...
I'd have thought a power source on such a scale to project onto dome large enough to encompass the planer would at least have a heat signature. But apparently it's freezing near it.
 
Nukehasslefan said:
I went right through like most did.
My qualifications are irrelevant.
Click to expand...
What does that even mean? You seem to find it difficult to answer a question directly. All the way through? What made it to the end of school and perhaps got a GCSE or O-Level or two, or all the way through our education system and you are a Professor?

You claim that all our education right through to the highest levels is learn and regurgitate facts, almost a feat of memory rather than the analaysis, research and proof from first principals I claim. Why are you not willing to say what your first hand experience of this is and in what subjects? Do you have any experience of our education system beyond school to be making this claim?
 
Nukehasslefan said:
Just follow north on your compass and see where it takes you before you start to feel the effects of the cold and then severe cold until you have to turn back.
You could follow south on the compass until you experience the same cold.
Click to expand...

payne said:
I'd have thought a power source on such a scale to project onto dome large enough to encompass the planer would at least have a heat signature. But apparently it's freezing near it.
Click to expand...

How does this explain the hotter conditions at the equator?
 
legend7 said:
So do I do that if I measure my penis when it's curving down, could quote some pretty impressive fall to the birds.
So where is the quote that you're trying to disprove from globe people that say its squared?
That's from one of your nutters
Click to expand...

You must be logged on to see external links

He got it from here about half way down the page - utter drivel.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top