It makes absolute sense to anyone with a brain.
It makes no sense to you because you're absolutely determined to do everything you can to make it not make sense to you at every single step of the explanations we give you. You're not trying to understand how it works, you're trying to stop yourself from understanding how it works.
I tried so many times. I once believed it all. Don't forget that bit.
It makes no sense because it looks like nonsense and simple water level experiments prove it to be nonsense, not because I refuse to understand it.
Presumably you do this so that you can continue spouting this bizarre fruitloop theory of cells that nobody has any evidence of, ice walls that nobody has ever seen or has evidence of, energy projections that nobody has any evidence of, and big central energy vortices that nobody has ever seen or has any evidence of.
No. Nobody has to mention anything to do with my thought process on what I think Earth is.
This is about the nonsense of a spinning globe, from my side but I try to answer questions from those who are interested in alternate theories.
You tell us you've done experiments that prove science to be wrong, but you won't tell us what those experiments are, and for some reason you won't publish these groundbreaking, world-shattering results that would undoubtedly earn you a Nobel prize and elevate your name above the likes of Einstein, Newton and Hawking.
No. I do my own experiments that prove a lot more to me than what we're being told. I cannot directly prove to anyone that my experiments show science to be wrong, only that some of my experiments show....to me......the globe and space are not what we're told...but then again I don't accept a spinning globe and the space we're told about, as any genuine science.
No, you haven't. You've shown how it works in the fantasy world of your brain and refuse to accept that it is YOU that is introducing additional forces to turn the tilt of the planet 360 degrees as you go around the sun, while our explanation of the system requires no such force because the tilt stays in the same direction all the way around.
The global model has been tweaked and tweaked over time to cater for what we supposedly observe.
The title alone is added in nonsense, just as a spin in elliptical orbits are nonsense...but that's just my thought process.
You can believe what you want to and follow what you want, obviously.
My issue isn't with people like you. It's with the nonsense global storlines pushed out by those who invented it all up.
Our explanation is realistic.
To you and those who think on the same lines as you, yes.
Yours is swingball and fairground rides. And you don't even accept the basic concepts that make swingball and fairground rides work anyway, so how you can use them in your explanations is anybody's guess.
Yes. It brings a reality to weed out the fantasy global storylines....etc..
Well at least you believe that friction exists. That's a start.
Yep and I believe that because we have a medium that it acts in.
It isn't. If you can go and find me a 4-dimensional latex membrane I'll do the experiment for you and film it for you.
What will a latex membrane show to you?
There is no wobbling change in orientation in the model we have shown you.
Of course there is.
The only model on this thread with a wobbling change in orientation is the model you showed us where one pole stays on the outside all the way around.
There's no wobbling in that one. The pole stays pointed in one direction only.
Your poles change direction from pointing away from your sun to pointing at it.
This should be a massive clue.
You can literally see elliptical orbits happening with your own eyes on that video using the latex membrane. Are you trying to tell us now that you believe elliptical orbits are impossible?
I'm not arguing any latex membrane. It does not show any reality of orbits except to put a pretence on them being a reality in a so called vacuum being supposedly pulled by a massive sun that apparently spews out radiation in that vacuum...somehow and yet it doesn't push anything away it still apparently somehow pulls Earth in and warps the space in this vacuum that is devoid of any matter.
It's utter utter nonsense as far as I'm concerned.
You know what's a great story but that's all it is? The story about cells that nobody has any evidence of, ice walls that nobody has ever seen or has evidence of, energy projections that nobody has any evidence of, and big central energy vortices that nobody has ever seen or has any evidence of.
Yep, I believe so as well.
I'd love to be able to show it as a reality but I do not have the means to do so, so it remains a story. A thought process and a possibility (to me).
No mate, you're getting confused again. Superman is a work of fiction written by someone that either didn't understand physics or didn't care that his story had scientific flaws because it was intended for young kids.
Yep. Just like space satellites were thought up by a fictional story writer called Arthur C Clarke, as the storyline goes.
It's all about what people want to believe in all age brackets and how each story is told and sold.
Actually, special relativity came first. General relativity came 10 years later. It doesn't surprise me that you don't know this. It would absolutely surprise me if you could explain what either of them were supposed to be describing in your own words without consulting the internet first to find out.
It doesn't matter which is which, they're both gobbledygook as far as I'm concerned.
And then look at the rest of the people in this conversation who have heard the actual real science behind it all and are not baffled by it.
I bet they're baffled to all hell about lot's of it all but they have no need to say why.
All the info is there to peruse.
People can read about superman and not even argue as to why he can do so much with his powers but ask them questions on him and many would offer answers or go back and reference for those answers, like is done on here with the global model. Both fiction but easily argued for, without knowing the reality.
It's so weird. How can so many of us be so wrong and claim to use this incorrect science in our everyday lives,
How many people believe in a god ?
How many sections of people, each in their millions believe in their own religion and god?
Can any of them be wrong?
from GPS to mobile phone communication to the electronics in the computer you're using right now. We're obviously all just liars or deluded, and unaware that we're sitting here in the presence of the greatest free-thinking mind that has ever lived!
Plenty of communication towers dotted all over the place, plus high buildings housing them.
Stations placed all over and relays...etc.
There's absolutely no need for any fictional space stuff to be added in to the set up.
No it is not. Do you mind me asking how far you went through the UK education system and what your highest qualification is or where your experience of the highest levels of education comes from?
I went right through like most did.
My qualifications are irrelevant.
There's some genius people out there that struggled through school, just as there are some genius people out there who aced their schooling.
Pieces of paper are a great way to make people proud and a great way to make a person feel qualified in their field after their hard work in memorising and following procedures in their apprenticeships, etc.
I admire anyone who qualifies in their chosen field just as I admire anyone who can be self taught or be innovative whether they have zero qualifications or even went to school.
Someone with 100 certificates has no more credence to me than someone who has none.
Each person has their own level of capabilities and each one adds to the ongoing push of nature.
It just depends on how it's looked at and by who.
