• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

England v India (2nd test) Lords


It’s such a shame about the bowling injuries mind

you at woakes and stokes to this and we’d beat these in my view

I maintain I’d have played Overton over Curran, he’s improved and he’s at the batsman all the time and bowls very tight.
 
The Rat said:
It’s such a shame about the bowling injuries mind

you at woakes and stokes to this and we’d beat these in my view

I maintain I’d have played Overton over Curran, he’s improved and he’s at the batsman all the time and bowls very tight.
Click to expand...
I don’t really get Curran tbh, don’t think he’s good enough either batting or bowling
 
Comeback_Kenwyne said:
This is it... People who don't like cricket are buzzing on it. Though the point made about the extra investment and - f***ing crucially - sticking a chunk of it on terrestrial TV is well made by @Steak Pie is fair. Stick the f***ing tests on terrestial and we'd be in a different f***ing stratosphere - we know that, we remember it! Even if it was just the Ashes it would transform the game in this country.
Click to expand...
Exactly, get a couple of the Ashes tests back on terrestrial and see what happens!
 
I don’t think Curran is a bad player just not good enough for test cricket. He’s a good short over game player with his little cameos but think domestic level is his calling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top