Flat Earthers

[Baloo]

Can you prove any of them?

Can I prove that no flat earther has provided a to-scale map (or even better an actual photo of the whole flat world), and then proved it to be accurate by documenting their journey between two places on said map? Yes, because it has never been done.

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Yeah it must be difficult everyone thinking you are mad

Not at all.
It's pretty easy to deal with.
My quote should help.

Would you recommend some real ones please?

That's for you to decide.

 

[Boris Bear]

If I had fact based evidence of everything then I'd have no need to question anything.

Any fact based evidence of your own then?

Not at all.
It's pretty easy to deal with.
My quote should help.

That's for you to decide.

I’ll go with your recommendation

 

[Nukehasslefan]

But he’s explaining it using evidence from scientific data and research going back 1000’s of years.

what evidence do you have to debunk all this though?
Surely you have something, you cannot act like a 6 year old and say it’s not true for the hell of it

What scientific data going back 1000's of years?
Where is this data stored?
What is drawn/written?

Any fact based evidence of your own then?

Water level.

 

[Tees Exile]

They aren't WUMs that's the scary thing.


These types think they are being 'questioning' and 'open minded' because they doubt everything. What it really boils down to is a distrust of authority so even if something is 'fact' they have an aversion to the thing because it comes from a position of authority.

I have a distrust of authority, particularly after this past year. Luckily, I can still handle the concepts of basic science

 

[Baloo]

I have a distrust of authority, particularly after this past year. Luckily, I can still handle the concepts of basic science

You’ve learned the wrong science.

 

[DPTT]

What scientific data going back 1000's of years?
Where is this data stored?
What is drawn/written?

Water level.

Really
Scholars off thousands of years ago realised the Earth was a sphere.
Data to most things nowadays can be found on this internet thing and maybe a library
Your arguements are pretty pathetic mate, accept that data is out there on this subject but am asking you to debunk their theories without you resorting to childish responses

Haway (or Howay since your a mag) let us know why you think it’s all wrong and you are right

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Really
Scholars off thousands of years ago realised the Earth was a sphere.

How?

Data to most things nowadays can be found on this internet thing and maybe a library

Real data or supposed data that is supposedly copied?

Your arguements are pretty pathetic mate, accept that data is out there on this subject but am asking you to debunk their theories without you resorting to childish responses

That depends on the data and what it represents/

Haway (or Howay since your a mag) let us know why you think it’s all wrong and you are right

I believe I'm wight because of the most simplest things we have on Earth.
Water and atmospheric pressure.

That's more than enough for me to know in my mind that we do not live on a spinning globe.

Can you prove we do?

 

[payne]

Really
Scholars off thousands of years ago realised the Earth was a sphere.
Data to most things nowadays can be found on this internet thing and maybe a library
Your arguements are pretty pathetic mate, accept that data is out there on this subject but am asking you to debunk their theories without you resorting to childish responses

Haway (or Howay since your a mag) let us know why you think it’s all wrong and you are right

..........because opinion

 

[taipeisafc]

Water level.



You will need to start questioning the narratives and delving into it yourself. You'll never do it if you are not dedicated to finding it out without the distraction of peer pressure and ridicule.
It's far easier for people to just follow the accepted norm.

He's a journalist who now spouts off about science.
They're good entertainers for the masses.

Tyson earned a

You must be logged on to see external links

degree in physics at

You must be logged on to see external links

in 1980 and then began his graduate work at the

You must be logged on to see external links

, from which he received an degree in astronomy in 1983. By his own account, he did not spend as much time in the research lab as he should have. His professors encouraged him to consider alternative careers and the committee for his doctoral dissertation was dissolved, ending his pursuit of a doctorate from the University of Texas.

Tyson was a lecturer in astronomy at the from 1986 to 1987 and in 1988, he was accepted into the astronomy graduate program at , where he earned an degree in astrophysics in 1989, and a degree in astrophysics in 1991 under the supervision of Professor R. Michael Rich. Rich obtained funding to support Tyson's doctoral research from NASA and the ARCS foundation enabling Tyson to attend international meetings in Italy, Switzerland, Chile, and South Africa and to hire students to help him with data reduction. In the course of his thesis work, he observed using the 0.91 m telescope at the in Chile, where he obtained images for the helping to further their work in establishing as .

During his thesis research at Columbia University, Tyson became acquainted with Professor at , who visited Columbia University in the course of collaborating with his thesis advisor on the Galactic bulge typically found in .

I didn't realise journalists needed degrees in Phsyics and Astronomy now.

 

[DPTT]

How?



Real data or supposed data that is supposedly copied?


That depends on the data and what it represents/


I believe I'm wight because of the most simplest things we have on Earth.
Water and atmospheric pressure.

That's more than enough for me to know in my mind that we do not live on a spinning globe.

Can you prove we do?

Of course I can’t personally prove it and you know that and that’s why it’s your default response to everyone on here.

What is “real” and “supposed” data, how do you distinguish between the two?

Do you question everything you don’t observe with your own eyes?

..........because opinion

What do you mean?

 

[payne]

Of course I can’t personally prove it and you know that and that’s why it’s your default response to everyone on here.

What is “real” and “supposed” data, how do you distinguish between the two?

Do you question everything you don’t observe with your own eyes?

What do you mean?

If he went up in the space rocket he'd just say the windows were fish eyed

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Tyson earned a

You must be logged on to see external links

degree in physics at

You must be logged on to see external links

in 1980 and then began his graduate work at the

You must be logged on to see external links

, from which he received an degree in astronomy in 1983. By his own account, he did not spend as much time in the research lab as he should have. His professors encouraged him to consider alternative careers and the committee for his doctoral dissertation was dissolved, ending his pursuit of a doctorate from the University of Texas.

Tyson was a lecturer in astronomy at the from 1986 to 1987 and in 1988, he was accepted into the astronomy graduate program at , where he earned an degree in astrophysics in 1989, and a degree in astrophysics in 1991 under the supervision of Professor R. Michael Rich. Rich obtained funding to support Tyson's doctoral research from NASA and the ARCS foundation enabling Tyson to attend international meetings in Italy, Switzerland, Chile, and South Africa and to hire students to help him with data reduction. In the course of his thesis work, he observed using the 0.91 m telescope at the in Chile, where he obtained images for the helping to further their work in establishing as .

During his thesis research at Columbia University, Tyson became acquainted with Professor at , who visited Columbia University in the course of collaborating with his thesis advisor on the Galactic bulge typically found in .

I didn't realise journalists needed degrees in Phsyics and Astronomy now.

He's still a journalist.

 

[payne]

Really
Scholars off thousands of years ago realised the Earth was a sphere.
Data to most things nowadays can be found on this internet thing and maybe a library
Your arguements are pretty pathetic mate, accept that data is out there on this subject but am asking you to debunk their theories without you resorting to childish responses

Haway (or Howay since your a mag) let us know why you think it’s all wrong and you are right

..........because opinion

..........because opinion

All that matters is that his opinion is valid no matter what

 

[DPTT]

He's still a journalist.

So is Gary Lineker just a presenter and his views etc mean nowt now even though he was a professional footballer in the past?

 

[payne]

He's still a journalist.

Stephen Hawking also used a wheelchair

 

[Nukehasslefan]

Of course I can’t personally prove it and you know that and that’s why it’s your default response to everyone on here.

Am I entitled to that?

What is “real” and “supposed” data, how do you distinguish between the two?

Good question. How?

The only real way is to verify it physically by testing it after observing it and repeating.
Only then will we know the potential reality.
Anything less is a best guess or even misinfo/disinfo.

Do you question everything you don’t observe with your own eyes?

If I think it's worth questioning, yes.

..........because opinion

All that matters is that his opinion is valid no matter what

My opinions aren't valid. They are what they are....opinions.

 

[DPTT]

Am I entitled to that?

Good question. How?

The only real way is to verify it physically by testing it after observing it and repeating.
Only then will we know the potential reality.
Anything less is a best guess or even misinfo/disinfo.


If I think it's worth questioning, yes.



My opinions aren't valid. They are what they are....opinions.

Did you watch England vs Ukraine in Rome?

 

[Nukehasslefan]

So is Gary Lineker just a presenter and his views etc mean nowt now even though he was a professional footballer in the past?

I never said Neil de Grasse's views mean nothing.
They mean something to some...maybe many.

Did you watch England vs Ukraine in Rome?

Yep.

 

[DPTT]

I never said Neil de Grasse's views mean nothing.
They mean something to some...maybe many.

Yep.

So you were physically in Rome to watch the game?