• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

New Pitch at The Stadium

Status
Not open for further replies.
hertsmackem said:
of course they are Donald bought a job lot...
Click to expand...
the higher season ticket prices will pay for new ones
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
I agree but NOT what most on here where shouting for.
Re distribution of shares to a new majority share holder is a poor complete takeover.
Anyhow how's things Rocky?
Click to expand...
so when will they fill out the paperwork properly..because at the moment they have filed innacurate paperwork at companies house
 
Last edited:

kildaremackem said:
my point is about what happens between now and your IF....ie they have a significant shareholding and are funding it..though im interested that the others would stay on after any putatiive promotion..the fact they are here at his behest is itelsef interwtsing..why does he want them here? he has the ability to do it without them but is choosing not to?
Click to expand...
Sorry can you translate the latter part of your post
 
garyswc said:
It wouldn't have needed replacing if that prick hadn't neglected it so badly in the first place, now he contributes 5% and he's a hero.
Click to expand...
kildaremackem said:
a lot more than 5 per cent..
and a lot more than youve contributed
Click to expand...
Walmo said:
What a general sweeping statement that is. So you’ve no idea what the makeup of this agreement is, what is and what isn’t included, the conditions on what is paid for, how much needs to be paid etc etc. But you’re going to try rile people up. Sad.
Click to expand...
kildaremackem said:
we know the agreement includes funfing..all i said was funidng..i ditdnt say how much
Click to expand...
You specifically said he has contributed more than 5% towards the new pitch. So how much? Cash or percentage for 21/22 will do.
 
In connection with this, there's an interesting, if long, piece, in today's Guardian about the rise in importance of the groundsman (which now seems far too simplistic a job title for what they actually do)

You must be logged on to see external links
 
Grumpy Old Man said:
In connection with this, there's an interesting, if long, piece, in today's Guardian about the rise in importance of the groundsman (which now seems far too simplistic a job title for what they actually do)

You must be logged on to see external links
Click to expand...
How about the title 'pitch magicians' instead?
 
L1lyBrown said:
I said net contributions. How much did he take out to pay for his purchase from Short in tv money and loans?
Click to expand...
none from para money. as for loans..thatonly matters if the club, rather than he, paid them back, quinnysmob took out a huge loan which was actually only paid back by the last set of para money..the money freaks on here say donald "took"
 
kildaremackem said:
none from para money. as for loans..thatonly matters if the club, rather than he, paid them back, quinnysmob took out a huge loan which was actually only paid back by the last set of para money..the money freaks on here say donald "took"
Click to expand...
When did you start supporting Sunderland?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top