• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

New Pitch at The Stadium

Status
Not open for further replies.

garyswc said:
Less than the leccy bill for the hydroponic lighting and the ground staff wages under the final 6 months of his tenure
Click to expand...
he did 2.2 million in the last set of accounts and that was less shit as a financial year than this one
rocky said:
No I'm asking how much he put in, you said it was a lot more than 5%. You haven't a clue how much really. Proper gobshite you
Click to expand...
he did 2.2m last year..thats a lot more than 5 per cent
 
garyswc said:
The pitch was neglected under his watch. Now it is being replaced because it wasn't looked after properly.
Click to expand...
yes thats right. KLD has inheirted a pile of shite from donald because of donalds neglect.
donald inherited a pile of shite from short because of shorts negligence, something which dropped the club to a loss last year
 
kildaremackem said:
your right fonald morally benefitted from the para money but he didnt "take it out" of the club which is the lie..and we know it wasnt legally binding because legal contracts are included in company documents...but yes i think he/they have a moral obligation to fund it..

ask KLD
Click to expand...

Seems like semantics to argue if Donald “took it out” or “benefitted” from it tbh. Either way, I don’t think he should be applauded for putting “money in” when he’s still not paid the whole amount back - from or moral or legal point of view.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top