• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Championship Format

brandon

Striker
Interesting article in the Guardian on this years County Championship and the format.


Two main topics appear to be whether or not we return to two divisions once Covid has been f*cked off AND a draw is now worth 8 points.

I’m for the two divisional structure personally, we should have course never have been demoted. I think in the long run though it means that the standard of cricket is better for longer over the course of the season, both in terms of ability and in general competitiveness given that there’s something to play for right the way until the end for most clubs.

I fear that this year, for 12 clubs, the (red ball) season will effectively end in June. Possibly earlier if it’s mathematically proven they can’t progress.

Regarding the added points for draws, for me there are more negatives than positives, I completely understand Root’s argument and those who suggest it will teach/force players to put more value on getting a result of some kind even if they fall behind in the game.

I worry however, that it may become too much of a lottery if certain clubs lose more time to rain than others. It may work in other countries, where you’re pretty much guaranteed four full days of play - a draw would clearly mean a team has earned it - as opposed to our wet climate.
 

Interesting article in the Guardian on this years County Championship and the format.


Two main topics appear to be whether or not we return to two divisions once Covid has been f*cked off AND a draw is now worth 8 points.

I’m for the two divisional structure personally, we should have course never have been demoted. I think in the long run though it means that the standard of cricket is better for longer over the course of the season, both in terms of ability and in general competitiveness given that there’s something to play for right the way until the end for most clubs.

I fear that this year, for 12 clubs, the (red ball) season will effectively end in June. Possibly earlier if it’s mathematically proven they can’t progress.

Regarding the added points for draws, for me there are more negatives than positives, I completely understand Root’s argument and those who suggest it will teach/force players to put more value on getting a result of some kind even if they fall behind in the game.

I worry however, that it may become too much of a lottery if certain clubs lose more time to rain than others. It may work in other countries, where you’re pretty much guaranteed four full days of play - a draw would clearly mean a team has earned it - as opposed to our wet climate.
-3 groups of 6. Everyone plays twice-4 day games. Groups made of 2 Northern, 2 Midlands/Western and 2 Southern counties.

-Top two from each group and two third place teams advance to the play-offs (8 teams straight knock out-5 day games). Final held at the home ground of the highest seeded team starting on the last Wednesday of September.

-10:30 start and 96 over days. Teams don't come off until they've completed 32 overs in a session unless conditions intervene.

-Bonus points awarded for highest first innings score.

Then again, what I would do with the Championship depends on what day of the week it is.
 
I get the feeling this 3 conference system is here to stay. It will probably get tinkered with but looks like it fits in with the T20 cricket easier and that will do for the ECB and the counties.
 
I get the feeling this 3 conference system is here to stay. It will probably get tinkered with but looks like it fits in with the T20 cricket easier and that will do for the ECB and the counties.
I do too mate.

Some interesting points on the TMS Preview Podcast, seemed like the coaches were for the two division structure staying - for reasons of competitiveness and proof that it works going back to the 2005 Ashes - while Agnew seems to like the conference idea for no real reason except that it’s exciting (to him).

Anthony McGrath (I think, could’ve been Jason Kerr) made an excellent point:

“Whenever England lose, people look at county cricket.”

What he didn’t say, but it was of course a continuation of the point he was making: When England win, nobody praises the county setup.
 
One thing is for certain - if Durham get off to the same start they did in 2019 ie losing their first four Championship games then under this new format their red ball season will be over before the first Bank Holiday in May.
 
I don’t like it at all and hope it will be done away with once the public health situation allows a more normal season. The conference thing just leaves two thirds of the counties with dead rubbers from June onwards
It's the first step towards the aim of reducing the Championship to ten games a season which as you say will basically be the case for two thirds of the counties under the new format.

Sadly I imagine that some of the counties will be rather pleased about this.
 
I'd prefer two divisions, it was a good thing imho and I'm a bit of an old fart so if there's going to be change I'd like to see good hard evidence why it is necessary. But having said that I like the sound of this conference system and would like to see how it plays out.
 
As a Gloucestershire fan who's waited a long time for div 1 county cricket, i'd be rather disappointed if they didn't return to 2 divisions.

Surely 2 divisions means more entertaining cricket across both divisions?
 
As a Gloucestershire fan who's waited a long time for div 1 county cricket, i'd be rather disappointed if they didn't return to 2 divisions.

Surely 2 divisions means more entertaining cricket across both divisions?
I agree, it’s certainly going to be more competitive for longer. As I’ve said already, the conference setup means by mid-June 12 of the 18 clubs will have nothing to play for. That can’t be good for anybody.
 
Back
Top