• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Sri Lanka v England (2nd test) 22nd/26th Jan

Status
Not open for further replies.

viccarlton said:
Or remove retaining your review if it’s umpires call.
Click to expand...
It's a great topic to debate. Originally DRS was brought in to remove the howlers (or the "questionable' decisions you used to get in Pakistan) but because the technology is so advanced it gives absolutely microscopic analysis of the delivery - analysis that the Umpire could never do with the human eye.
 
viccarlton said:
Or remove retaining your review if it’s umpires call.
Click to expand...

Nah, I think the retaining of the review is correct and important given that there’s a level of doubt built into the system.

With all the hysteria that VAR has created I think DRS is about as perfect a system you can get.
 
brandon said:
Nah, I think the retaining of the review is correct and important given that there’s a level of doubt built into the system.
Click to expand...
I think the only way to make it "fair" is to refer every appeal to DRS and hitting means out. However, it removes a great deal of the charm of the game by making an umpire no more than a hat stand. I wouldn't be in favour of that at all
Bonzo said:
Iv been watching on and off, who's the bloke they keep showing standing by himself?
Click to expand...
The solitary England fan in SL - am assuming he must live there
 
brandon said:
Nah, I think the retaining of the review is correct and important given that there’s a level of doubt built into the system.

With all the hysteria that VAR has created I think DRS is about as perfect a system you can get.
Click to expand...

Love DRS me, works so well in cricket....and tennis actually.
Football....well they need to work on it.

Still feel nervous when Sibley is facing :lol:
Do you play or rest him for India?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top