• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Sale is close - Barnsey

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sad to see lots of kitten posts on here atm. All he does is complicate things with his endless analysis! Tired of it.

Personally I prefer analysis to speculation.

It's interesting to see someone's perspective based on reality.
Its mad that people on here still get caught up in these takeover threads. Its a total load of shite.

Tis a good job you know the real score.

Logon or register to see this image
 
Last edited:
Good post mate, but Bailey Wright must also be recognised as a new CB, as he got injured having played only 5 games, while on loan. Huge signing IMO.

An attacking MF in the mould of Szmodics or Maddison would be welcome and a good goal scorer to help Grigg......I don't see Danny Graham as being that man.
As far as attacking midfielders, I’d prefer to give Embleton, Diamond and Neil an opportunity to begin their careers than to bring in someone who would impede their progress. I agree with regard to Danny Graham, as he isn’t what is needed
 
Personally I prefer analysis to speculation.

It's interesting to see someone's perspective based on reality.
It's difficult to analyse something you don't know about though isn't it, we've had over a year of analysis about our books and spending all based on assumptions, analysis means you have the facts and draw conclusions.
 
It's difficult to analyse something you don't know about though isn't it, we've had over a year of analysis about our books and spending all based on assumptions, analysis means you have the facts and draw conclusions.

So what you're saying is the analysis is speculation and I've stumped myself?

It's a good point, I still prefer stuff that I believe to be feasible like kittens financial possibilities than many posts saying he staying or leaving, wish he'd fuck off, it's fine if he stays, can't believe you think there is a takeover etc etc....

Not to say there is anything wrong with those posts, I just disagree with the chap that says the speculative analysis is poor.
 
its obvious that the info came from donald directly , this after his interview with Barnes and his stepping down.. Irc at the time Methven was not to be seen so unless it Was Fox, Rodwell ,Jones or Sloanes i'd be pretty sure it was the main Chancer in chief who gave the info to Barnes..

It looks like his work but there's still that small chance it could of been any of the above, just wish it was all over.
I only check the last page now, instead of reading the last 10.:lol:
 
As far as attacking midfielders, I’d prefer to give Embleton, Diamond and Neil an opportunity to begin their careers than to bring in someone who would impede their progress. I agree with regard to Danny Graham, as he isn’t what is needed
Definitely. Neil in particular has shown, admittedly against limited opposition, that he could have the potential to be more than capable in an attacking midfield role.
 
Personally I prefer analysis to speculation.

It's interesting to see someone's perspective based on reality.


Tis a good job you know the real score.

Logon or register to see this image
Nobody does and asking for updates when there clearly arent any is ridiculous

Did last year not teach people that nobody on here knows a thing 🙄
 
Sad to see lots of kitten posts on here atm. All he does is complicate things with his endless analysis! Tired of it.

You don't like my posts? Put me on ignore. This isn't 606, people have widely differing opinions and thoughts on here, trying to shut people down is not going to work I suspect.

It's a complex scenario. There are many possibilities, I have given you one and you can disbelieve it, just like lots of people did when I suggested there was a £20m+ debt owed to the club last season that could be written off. I was actually banned from here and made persona non grata on 606 for stating this. Then a year later it happened almost exactly as I said.

I'm not saying that means I'm going to be 100% on everything, but I am not just pulling figures from nowhere. I run a complex business and know how a lot of this stuff works from an owner/CEO perspective. If you want to believe the simplistic 'Donald can't afford to run us' playing to the crowd line, and ignore the 'Here's why he really can and it's a bad thing if he has to' reasoned analysis, then fine, but maybe consider that other people may want to read it because it's relevant to our takeover.

Unlike your post.
 
If it was down to SD he would of just appointed Rodwell. Would of cost him fuck all extra
I think SD would happily just leave things as they are. Same with bladdering Cooke and other things. Everything we've done (actually seen publicly to happen) has been consistent with a club that is paring back drastically to save any operating cost it can. That doesn't mean that something isn't happening, but using the absence of action as strong supporting evidence for activity is a big old stretch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top