• The forum upgrades are now largely complete.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

Sale is close - Barnsey

Status
Not open for further replies.
surely if his FIL gets involved that changes and he be move involved day to day

I can’t see his fil being remotely arsed about us mate. It will just be a small investment from him in a company he doesn’t have anything to do with

Even juan hasn’t remotely been involved in day to day running

Doesn’t add up to me
 

Pleased to hear it. Don't think you'd post it if you weren't supremely confident either as you know all the grief you'll inevitably get if it doesn't happen.

I understand some absolute obsess over this and therefore, I just like to give them info I hear. We all want this to go through mate. If, for whatever reason, it doesn't. So be it. However, I absolutely know, at this moment in time, the information is accurate. Any grief I get if it doesn't happen will not out strip my personal feelings of a bleak Safc future anyway.
 
Whats the point in satori staying? If its the bloke from fpp then why would he need juan who from what i can gather has offered the square root

Pure speculation but the two scenarios I can see are:

1. Now we're apparently stepping up and getting serious owners in he doesn't want to give up his shares, his FiL coming on board is to show he can offer something too.

2. He's holding on as a defacto representative of the three of them as a means for SD and CM to still get a payout if we go up to the PL. They can't stay publicly as they've upset too many people, but their mate can stay and share the spoils with them later.
 
Evening all.

Deal still ongoing

Big week still planned

Don't get caught up on others saying investment rather than takeover. The planned investment is big enough therefore, it's simply semantics

Still confident
Confident that it's people with decent resources?
 
Evening all.

Deal still ongoing

Big week still planned

Don't get caught up on others saying investment rather than takeover. The planned investment is big enough therefore, it's simply semantics

Still confident
The rumoured parties involved true? ie: Furham, Satoris father in law?
 
I understand some absolute obsess over this and therefore, I just like to give them info I hear. We all want this to go through mate. If, for whatever reason, it doesn't. So be it. However, I absolutely know, at this moment in time, the information is accurate. Any grief I get if it doesn't happen will not out strip my personal feelings of a bleak Safc future anyway.

How excited should we be?
 
If they'd been straight about the parachute payments from day one i actually think people would've accepted it. They should never have told the podcasts / The Echo that they were security only.
Yeah I agree, but that probably wasn't intentional as a deception, imo it was more of showing they had money and trying to be
With all due respect, I think this is a huge reduction in what he has actually done to the club.

Someone who bases our strategy on galvanising the fans alone is hugely underestimating their position as owner of this football club.

Looking at the owning the club as "fun" and will give him a day out with his lad is criminal in itself.

At no point has he ever realised or even put any amount of work into being the best owner he could be, to busy having a merry and then feeling sorry for himself.

This football club isn't a play thing, it's a big cutthroat business and unless you are going to pour your heart, soul, effort and intellegence into it or you employ someone to do so, you have no place owning it.
Definitely, but making errors isn't the same as being a thief and taking money out of the club etc, don't mistake me as a Donald fanboy but I just don't accept he's a bad person.
 
He was pretty consistent when he was saying that Donald was a good owner that had just made one or two mistakes and that the real problem with safc was the fans, too.

I do believe that Bob hears stuff - albeit his desire to project himself as all-knowing often undermines what he does know. However, while he may know the price of stuff, his continued rabid backing of Donald proves that knows the value of nothing.
Why do you think Bob got ITK information because he backed Donald and Metvhen
 
Pure speculation but the two scenarios I can see are:

1. Now we're apparently stepping up and getting serious owners in he doesn't want to give up his shares, his FiL coming on board is to show he can offer something too.

2. He's holding on as a defacto representative of the three of them as a means for SD and CM to still get a payout if we go up to the PL. They can't stay publicly as they've upset too many people, but their mate can stay and share the spoils with them later.

Yeah 2 would make sense! SD clearly doesn’t want to give up his golden goose the bastard
 
"he said he didn't realise that absolutely everything he said would be scrutinized to the nth degree"

Roughly translated to 'I thought I could just fill thousands of people full of shit to make myself look good'
Absolute bollocks, something tells me you aren't interested in discussing it though so we'll just agree to disagree.
 
Rolling back the years. That was canny wild, don't really remember it all now.

Lots of stuff I have posted since is always intented to be as accurate, as I trust the info given to me at the time unequivocally. Obviously, as things progress, variables change and then things can go to the wall.

However, as of today, 19.52. This is not the case here.

Fingers crossed.

I think the only people on here I've trusted are yourself, Irish mackem, and iceman in the early Quinn takeover days.

That's it.

Thanks for sharing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top