People lost to conspiracy theories

DaveH said:
Thats not really true though is it?

Missions to the moon were very expensive and NASA was in danger of running way over their budgets. Interest from the public had wained - it was nothing new. Congress was reluctant to give such huge funds for them to keep doing the same thing. NASA themselves wanted to do longer missions and do more on the moon, which the Apollo mission LEM was not really suitable for. The technology they had invented had performed brilliantly but they had pushed it to its limits.

By the time further funds were available, newer safety rules and operating procedures made the Apollo hardware completely unsuitable. They still had much of it in museums, though some plans have been lost in the Atlanta federal archives. They still had the engineers and could have rebuilt the missing bits.

Focus then turned to a less expensive reusable craft that could also have commercial uses, such as putting satellites into orbit, orbiting stations and launch things like a big space telescope that they were starting to talk about.

Finally NASA have not said anything about not going back or that they can’t go back. Their current Artemis program aims to put the first woman on the moon by 2024. With a few other nations looking and Musk making serious noises (though not really producing any firm plans at the moment), there is a very good chance we will see a lunar return in the next decade. Shackleton crater in the south is a obvious target, but nostalgia and a legit investigation to see how the hardware has coped is likely to see us return to one of the Apollo landing sites. 17’s buggy would be my guess of what they want to look at. That will rather deflate the deniers though - or they will claim a multi-national fake to cover up the 60s and 70s fake. I.e. dig dig dig now they are firmly in the hole.
Click to expand...

So whilst all other technology has advanced expediently over the last 60 YEARS, at this point they reckon they've destroyed all the old technology and can't go back at this time, utter turd, absolute shite, nope there is more to this bollocks than they are telling us, how this Nasa fella keeps a straight face is beyond me.

 
Last edited:


SAFCOldie said:
So whilst all other technology has advanced expediently over the last 60 YEARS, at this point they reckon they've destroyed all the old technology and can't go back at this time, utter turd, absolute shite, nope there is more to this bollocks than they are telling us, how this Nasa fella keeps a straight face is beyond me.

Click to expand...
So you didn’t read the bit I said that even if they did have it “on ice”, it would not be suitable in this day and age or suitable for the sort of extended mission they want to do. I suppose it is more convenient to ignore that as it does not fit your narrative.

60 years of growth of technology yes, that has been in other areas because there has been no agenda to return to the moon, until now and now they are redeveloping it for a new kind of mission.
 
Pink Panther said:
It's so blatant. I'm still looking for the Randy MILF section.
Click to expand...
If you manage to get one make sure you keep the receipt. They tend to be very temperamental and rarely last the full warranty period.
DaveH said:
So you didn’t read the bit I said that even if they did have it “on ice”, it would not be suitable in this day and age or suitable for the sort of extended mission they want to do. I suppose it is more convenient to ignore that as it does not fit your narrative.

60 years of growth of technology yes, that has been in other areas because there has been no agenda to return to the moon, until now and now they are redeveloping it for a new kind of mission.
Click to expand...
It would also be practically impossible to rebuild Concord. That doesn't mean it was made up. :lol:
 
Last edited:
DaveH said:
So you didn’t read the bit I said that even if they did have it “on ice”, it would not be suitable in this day and age or suitable for the sort of extended mission they want to do. I suppose it is more convenient to ignore that as it does not fit your narrative.

60 years of growth of technology yes, that has been in other areas because there has been no agenda to return to the moon, until now and now they are redeveloping it for a new kind of mission.
Click to expand...

It doesn't fly with me like.
 
Legend said:
It’s scary how many I see sharing videos about this and similar. The “proof” they are willing to accept is any YouTube video that agrees, but they just keep telling people to “open their eyes” and shit whenever someone replies telling them they’re mental.
Click to expand...

The saddest thing I find about them is the strong and confident belief that they have stumbled upon the truth while the rest of us are mere sheep. They'll go round and round in circles complaining about people who disagree with their politics being beholden to the "MAINSTREAM MEDIA" yet the only people they agree with are those who consume the same Youtube channels and social media accounts and are therefore in on the truth.
 
I think there's a hell of a lot that goes on while 'normal' people just get on with their lives, Epstein, Weinstein and all that is getting exposed right now is more than likely the tip of the iceberg, how many dodgy celebrities have done some very dubious things but will never see the inside of a prison? There's something keeping them safe for now anyway, Polanski, Woody Allen and now Prince Andrew all more than a bit shady but walking amongst us, and God knows what the political types get up too, if it's prevalent in every day life why wouldn't it be even more prevalent in celebrity world?
 
DaveH said:
Thats not really true though is it?

Missions to the moon were very expensive and NASA was in danger of running way over their budgets. Interest from the public had wained - it was nothing new. Congress was reluctant to give such huge funds for them to keep doing the same thing. NASA themselves wanted to do longer missions and do more on the moon, which the Apollo mission LEM was not really suitable for. The technology they had invented had performed brilliantly but they had pushed it to its limits.

By the time further funds were available, newer safety rules and operating procedures made the Apollo hardware completely unsuitable. They still had much of it in museums, though some plans have been lost in the Atlanta federal archives. They still had the engineers and could have rebuilt the missing bits.

Focus then turned to a less expensive reusable craft that could also have commercial uses, such as putting satellites into orbit, orbiting stations and launch things like a big space telescope that they were starting to talk about.

Finally NASA have not said anything about not going back or that they can’t go back. Their current Artemis program aims to put the first woman on the moon by 2024. With a few other nations looking and Musk making serious noises (though not really producing any firm plans at the moment), there is a very good chance we will see a lunar return in the next decade. Shackleton crater in the south is a obvious target, but nostalgia and a legit investigation to see how the hardware has coped is likely to see us return to one of the Apollo landing sites. 17’s buggy would be my guess of what they want to look at. That will rather deflate the deniers though - or they will claim a multi-national fake to cover up the 60s and 70s fake. I.e. dig dig dig now they are firmly in the hole.
Click to expand...

Oldie blarn yet again.
 
Nebula said:
The saddest thing I find about them is the strong and confident belief that they have stumbled upon the truth while the rest of us are mere sheep. They'll go round and round in circles complaining about people who disagree with their politics being beholden to the "MAINSTREAM MEDIA" yet the only people they agree with are those who consume the same Youtube channels and social media accounts and are therefore in on the truth.
Click to expand...
There is a culture of preaching “Don’t just accept what you are told, go learn and figure it out for yourself”, followed by immediately following the ‘teachings’ of some slack jawed yokle on a youtube video and never quite getting round to the working out part.
 
Kid Galahad said:
CEO just resigned as well hasn't he and the said items all pulled from the website? Aye not dodgy at all....
Click to expand...

Apparently not a mistake in prices as they were industrial units rather than commercial.

Yet the CEO resigns and the items pulled?

Why pull the items if they are just industrial units?

Also if you search in yanex USA SRC then the model number of one of the pricey items it brings up pictures of kids?

Also that Tom Hanks has had on his Instagram USA SRC pictured written into the ground.
DaveH said:
There is a culture of preaching “Don’t just accept what you are told, go learn and figure it out for yourself”, followed by immediately following the ‘teachings’ of some slack jawed yokle on a youtube video and never quite getting round to the working out part.
Click to expand...

I dont believe the majority of them and do look about myself.

This one caught my interest as there was so many similar images cropping up which would be a massive coincidence.

So I looked further into it myself from checked other sources when read an article and looked up on the people.

I think there is definitely something in this and hopefully it will all come out in the wash and people punished.

It's not that far fetched to think people in power could also be horrible bastards?

Not preaching that the earth is flat or the queen is a lizard.. :lol:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DaveH said:
There is a culture of preaching “Don’t just accept what you are told, go learn and figure it out for yourself”, followed by immediately following the ‘teachings’ of some slack jawed yokle on a youtube video and never quite getting round to the working out part.
Click to expand...
All conspiracy theorists have been banned from youtube for a while now. The way i see the "look it up for yourself" comment is not just listening to the 'scientists' who are on mainstream media but to research what other scientists are saying, shame they all got banned from the internet and that speaks volumes to me.
 
BigPeter said:
Apparently not a mistake in prices as they were industrial units rather than commercial.

Yet the CEO resigns and the items pulled?

Why pull the items if they are just industrial units?

Also if you search in yanex USA SRC then the model number of one of the pricey items it brings up pictures of kids?

Also that Tom Hanks has had on his Instagram USA SRC pictured written into the ground.


I dont believe the majority of them and do look about myself.

This one caught my interest as there was so many similar images cropping up which would be a massive coincidence.

So I looked further into it myself from checked other sources when read an article and looked up on the people.

I think there is definitely something in this and hopefully it will all come out in the wash and people punished.

It's not that far fetched to think people in power could also be horrible bastards?

Not preaching that the earth is flat or the queen is a lizard.. :lol:
Click to expand...
Did you look as far as finding a reputable source showing the CEO has resigned?
Did you read the Snopes explanation and do you give them as much credence as conspiracy theory websites?
www.snopes.com

Is Wayfair Trafficking Children Via Overpriced Items?

The claim that Wayfair is trafficking children is based almost entirely on one person's confusion over an expensive cabinet.
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com
Any theories on why they would use a public facing website where all purchases can be traced rather than something like the Dark Web?
 
RestlessNatives said:
Did you look as far as finding a reputable source showing the CEO has resigned?
Did you read the Snopes explanation and do you give them as much credence as conspiracy theory websites?
www.snopes.com

Is Wayfair Trafficking Children Via Overpriced Items?

The claim that Wayfair is trafficking children is based almost entirely on one person's confusion over an expensive cabinet.
www.snopes.com www.snopes.com
Any theories on why they would use a public facing website where all purchases can be traced rather than something like the Dark Web?
Click to expand...
You have to laugh.
 
Howard the Duck said:
Ah man, not you too?! I’m only just getting over the fact that @Teed is lost down the rabbit hole!
Click to expand...
I would say I'm open to the idea rather than full on down the hole, you believe Andrew Windsor isn't in it up to his epaulettes then good for you, nothing ever happens that we don't know about of course, people with power have always abused it since time began they are just that arrogant now they hide stuff in plain sight to take the piss even more. Imo
 

Back
Top