• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Black Lives Matter

Status
Not open for further replies.
A welder who gets coked up. That's possibly enough for him to get the flick before recognising him as a thick racist.

I hope he has a much needed epiphany and is back in work soon, his actions should not result in a drain on the state.

Same goes for his thick racist other half.
 

Really have no idea what the point is you’re trying to make here.
They're using the murder of three gay men to further their political argument. They wouldn't bat an eyelid over this in the past, in fact they'd probably revel in three gays suffering. Gays are just a little down the shit list for the hard right than the blacks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do afford black lives the same value as white lives, exactly the same, I don't believe the colour of your skin has any impact on your intrinsic value as a human being what so ever.......what makes you think I don't afford them the same value?
I don't believe giving women equal rights diminishes men's rights, what makes you think I do.
when it comes to the question of how many stats you would need to show me to decide the depth of a problem it would depend on what stats you are showing. If someone has done a proper in depth multivariate analysis I would take the finding seriously.
If someone performs a univariate analysis on a problem I pay it the attention it deserves which is none at all.

The problem with the stats that are being thrown around at the moment are they can be used to fit any agenda. Unless a really in depth multivariate analysis has been done they mean absolutely nothing and that goes for the Left when they say they show one thing and equally for the right when they say it shows another.
If you have a stat that you feel is particularly telling then feel free to show it to me and I'll give you a opinion on what it means to me.
It’s not all about you.
 
They're using the murder of three gay men to further their political argument. They wouldn't bat an eyelid over this in the past, in fact they'd probably revel in three gays suffering. Gays are just a little down the shit list for the hard right than the blacks.
That really is straw clutching nonsense mind.
This whole BLM nonsense has done all the damage it needs without the help of the hard right.
I’d say people are pointing out the sheer nonsense regarding a wave of protests over something that happened 4000 miles away whilst something happens on our doorstep and it’s met with slight tut and let’s get back to the BLM movement.
 
That really is straw clutching nonsense mind.
This whole BLM nonsense has done all the damage it needs without the help of the hard right.
I’d say people are pointing out the sheer nonsense regarding a wave of protests over something that happened 4000 miles away whilst something happens on our doorstep and it’s met with slight tut and let’s get back to the BLM movement.
Is it fuck. I'd wager a load of those hard right speaking out for these dead men have given a bunch of 'puffs' a good hiding in the past. It's incredibly distasteful that they're using these deaths to discredit a movement they disagree with in my opinion.
 
Is it fuck. I'd wager a load of those hard right speaking out for these dead men have given a bunch of 'puffs' a good hiding in the past. It's incredibly distasteful that they're using these deaths to discredit a movement they disagree with in my opinion.
Or that BLM are using the death of a career criminal to further enhance their ludicrous ideology.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJH
Or that BLM are using the death of a career criminal to further enhance their ludicrous ideology.
It's more than Floyd and you know it. He and the way he was killed were just the straw that broke the camels back.
 
You called the BLM out for attacking police. The statue defending bigots did the same. How is asking your opinion on that WUM? Or is it too difficult a question for you to confront because it undermines your earlier point?

You have issues too. Racism for one, it seems.
...and the blm did not attack the police eh? I have sent more money to Africa than you have had pounds in your pocket. This was to help impoverished starving children, negected by their corrupt governments. If I wittnessed any vandalism on any memorial in Sunderland, I would not have hesitated in punching the people in the gob, whatever colour they were.
Please point out where I defended anyone being out of order, apart from defending monuments.
 
...and the blm did not attack the police eh? I have sent more money to Africa than you have had pounds in your pocket. This was to help impoverished starving children, negected by their corrupt governments. If I wittnessed any vandalism on any memorial in Sunderland, I would not have hesitated in punching the people in the gob, whatever colour they were.
Please point out where I defended anyone being out of order, apart from defending monuments.
I didn't say they didn't. But you discredit their entire argument based on these attacks. The other side, yours I'll assume, did exactly the same. Why haven't you mentioned that? And you don't know a thing about how much money I have in my pocket or how much I've donates to charity so don't assume you're better than me on that front.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I didn't say they didn't. But you discredit their entire argument based on these attacks. The other side, yours I'll assume, did exactly the same. Why haven't you mentioned that? And you don't know a thing about how much money I have in my pocket or how much I've donates to charity so don't assume you're better than me on that front.
Destroys his narrative, that's why
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top