Just watched a few minutes of that. All football aside it’s pretty scary to watch. I’d hate to be under that scrutiny. She doesn’t look comfortable at all. Quite compulsive viewing all the same.You must be logged on to see external links
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just watched a few minutes of that. All football aside it’s pretty scary to watch. I’d hate to be under that scrutiny. She doesn’t look comfortable at all. Quite compulsive viewing all the same.You must be logged on to see external links
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.Fuck me, you are an idiot.
You are the one who has stated Ashleys ambition is purely surviving. How do you know that as fact when everything that has been posted, shows that maybe his ‘ambition’ goes beyond that? How do you know he hasnt wanted to finished 10-14th each season? How do you know the season when you finished 5th, the club didnt fancy a crack at the top 8?
.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.If what you are saying is true, You could say that anybody who finishes outside the top 6 has an ambition to just survive, which is absolute bollocks.
Says the man who has posted on a rivals message board over a thousand times
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.
In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.
.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
Ashley didnt appoint allardyce
No it wasn't. Ashley's first appointment was an ill-conceived appointment of Kevin Keegan. Shepherd & Hall appointed Allardyce. (Ashley then lost a constructive dismissal case against Keegan because he let Wise and Vetere sign and sell players for/from the first team, rather than Keegan.)Why people think your being bias is your opinion on Ashley isn't true.
First appointment was Allardyce. Allardyces stock was high. Uefa cup football with Bolton. Not the appointment of survival.
McClaren's stock had fallen sharply. After Failing in the England job, he experienced success at Twente, then failed at Wolfsburg and got the sack, got 8pts from his first 10 games at Forest and resigned, failed in his second stint at Twente and after growing fan pressure quit, failed to get Derby up and was fired.He appointed McClaren. Despite whatever spin you attempt. McClaren took Boro to the uefa cup final. He was England manager and has managed in the champions League.
He did appoint Benitez after the Spaniard approached Newcastle for the job, then Ashley kept refusing to invest in the club or cede control of the transfers in the PL to a man who has won the Champions League. Culminating in Benitez running down his contract as he felt promises were not kept.He appointed Benitez a champions League winning manager.
Those three appointments cover 6 seasons or more of Ashley's decade in charge. So mainly Ashley has shown ambition at the top end of the table with his managerial appointments
He didn't get rid of him either. Shinawatra withdrew his contract from Man City Ashley could have done the same.
As for McClaren. What exactly had Benitez done recently he failed at both Inter and Napoli
What's this?
No, Benitez opted to leave, not the other way round. A contract offer was given which was turned down by Benitez.I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.
In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.
.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
Imagine trying to argue that appointing Steve Mcclaren or Sam Allardyce( who wasn't even appointed by Ashley) proves that Ashley shows ambition when appointing managers.
I honestly cannot fathom your stupidity.I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.
In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.
.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
probably worth a mention that he didn't exactly increase the value of his stock in the England job as he failed to qualify for the Euros, earned the title wally with the brolly and was promptly given the bullet.Also McClaren got Boro to a UEFA Cup final 7 years before he was appointed at Newcastle.
His most recent achievement was failing to get Derby promoted after a total collapse in the second half of the season. I don't think it's spin to judge a manager on their more recent performance. Being England manager doesn't hold the creedence it once did, it's a second tier job these days at best.
Yet your lot defend the potential takeover of the Saudis, you couldn't make it up.You must be logged on to see media items
the utter **** couldn’t wait
McClaren who had just won the Eredivisie?
Funny how that is conveniently forgotten.
They always spout bollocks as facts ,they thrive on lies.I honestly cannot fathom your stupidity.
Everything you have stated, as pointed out by myself and other posters, is your opinion. not FACT, your, OPINION, YOUR OPINION.
THERE IS CATEGORICALLY, NO EVIDENCE, TO STATE, MIKE ASHLEY, ONLY WANTS TO FINISH 17TH, THIS. IS. YOUR. OPINION.
You keep bleating on about aim v acheviment, so what i said was, based on your logic, anyone who isn't expected to finish inside the top 6 is simply aiming for survival, is that what you are suggesting? Yes or No?
probably worth a mention that he didn't exactly increase the value of his stock in the England job as he failed to qualify for the Euros, earned the title wally with the brolly and was promptly given the bullet.
Then he bombed out at wolfsburg, forest, twente and derby before Ashley decided he was the guy for him.