• The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on. Normal posting/reading should now be possible.
    Please read this thread for more details.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

June to July 2020 - NUFC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Fuck me, you are an idiot.

You are the one who has stated Ashleys ambition is purely surviving. How do you know that as fact when everything that has been posted, shows that maybe his ‘ambition’ goes beyond that? How do you know he hasnt wanted to finished 10-14th each season? How do you know the season when you finished 5th, the club didnt fancy a crack at the top 8?
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.

In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.


If what you are saying is true, You could say that anybody who finishes outside the top 6 has an ambition to just survive, which is absolute bollocks.
.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
 
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.

In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.



.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.

Why people think your being bias is your opinion on Ashley isn't true.

First appointment was Allardyce. Allardyces stock was high. Uefa cup football with Bolton. Not the appointment of survival.

He appointed McClaren. Despite whatever spin you attempt. McClaren took Boro to the uefa cup final. He was England manager and has managed in the champions League.

He appointed Benitez a champions League winning manager.

Those three appointments cover 6 seasons or more of Ashley's decade in charge. So mainly Ashley has shown ambition at the top end of the table with his managerial appointments
 
Also McClaren got Boro to a UEFA Cup final 7 years before he was appointed at Newcastle.

His most recent achievement was failing to get Derby promoted after a total collapse in the second half of the season. I don't think it's spin to judge a manager on their more recent performance. Being England manager doesn't hold the creedence it once did, it's a second tier job these days at best.
 
Last edited:
Why people think your being bias is your opinion on Ashley isn't true.

First appointment was Allardyce. Allardyces stock was high. Uefa cup football with Bolton. Not the appointment of survival.
No it wasn't. Ashley's first appointment was an ill-conceived appointment of Kevin Keegan. Shepherd & Hall appointed Allardyce. (Ashley then lost a constructive dismissal case against Keegan because he let Wise and Vetere sign and sell players for/from the first team, rather than Keegan.)

He appointed McClaren. Despite whatever spin you attempt. McClaren took Boro to the uefa cup final. He was England manager and has managed in the champions League.
McClaren's stock had fallen sharply. After Failing in the England job, he experienced success at Twente, then failed at Wolfsburg and got the sack, got 8pts from his first 10 games at Forest and resigned, failed in his second stint at Twente and after growing fan pressure quit, failed to get Derby up and was fired.

He appointed Benitez a champions League winning manager.
He did appoint Benitez after the Spaniard approached Newcastle for the job, then Ashley kept refusing to invest in the club or cede control of the transfers in the PL to a man who has won the Champions League. Culminating in Benitez running down his contract as he felt promises were not kept.

Those three appointments cover 6 seasons or more of Ashley's decade in charge. So mainly Ashley has shown ambition at the top end of the table with his managerial appointments

Well apart from; Kinnear, Shearer, Hughton, Pardew, Carver, McClaren, Bruce, you're spot on.
 
What's this?

Ashley purchased the club a week after Allardyce was appointed to imply he had no say or couldn't have sacked Allardyce immediately is a perfect example of how nufc fans move the goalposts.

Allardyce was set for Man City that year not Newcastle but once there takeover was announced the job offer was withdrawn
 
Imagine trying to argue that appointing Steve Mcclaren or Sam Allardyce( who wasn't even appointed by Ashley) proves that Ashley shows ambition when appointing managers.
 
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.

In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.



.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
No, Benitez opted to leave, not the other way round. A contract offer was given which was turned down by Benitez.

From the official NUFC statement - ""We have worked hard to extend Rafa’s contract over a significant period of time, however it has not been - and will not be - possible to reach an agreement with Rafa and his representatives."

In addition to the start and end of your paraghraph, If Mike Ashley only cared about finishing 17th i.e. survival, Why, after two consecutive seasons finishing 10th and 13th, did he spend 65M on incomings in the summer window?
 
I think most club's ambitions start at survival first and a case of seeing where that can take them.
Some/most clubs cannot make and hold the grade of champions league football on any regular basis and stay sustainable in terms of the transfer fee/wage climate.

I think Ashley recognised the north east is not the place to try and hold onto the higher echelons without throwing blank cheques at the club to appease fans and mercenary footballers who would likely only come for a king's ransom.

Ashley may not be a spendthrift but he will spend on carefully calculated gambles that ensure a contingency.
Net spends are deemed unambitious if that net spend is low, even if fantastic deals are done.
 
Imagine trying to argue that appointing Steve Mcclaren or Sam Allardyce( who wasn't even appointed by Ashley) proves that Ashley shows ambition when appointing managers.

McClaren who had just won the Eredivisie?

Funny how that is conveniently forgotten.
 
I can feel comfortable stating that Mike Ashley's ambition for Newcastle United starts and ends with Premier League survival because each decision he makes backs me up. Generally appointing middling managers that hopefully keep us up, failing to allow a manager to build a team that can progress, willingly selling the best players and then failing to replace them, failing to capitalise on positions of strengths and failing to arrest a slide quickly enough. Breaking up a group of players whose drive would have pushed the club forward, failing to invest in the facilities, failing to invest in the academy, failing to grow commercial revenue.

In Benitez he had a manager who could turn the fortunes of the club around, not just on the pitch, but off it as well. Rather than cede control and see his investment grow, he allowed one of the most trophied managers around leave, confident that the players would be enough to keep us up, even under Steve Bruce. Because that's all he cares about. That why Ashley was happy for the managers to have more transfer control in the Championship. He allowed Charnley to state that cups aren't a priority, citing concerns about relegation.



.. That would be bollocks. Jesus wept, this is such a simple concept, but it's eluding you entirely. Achievement does not necessarily equate to the aim. In 2015/16 Leicester's aim would have been to stay up given their previous season, but they won the league. Sheffield Utd's aim this season would be to survive, their achievement far exceeds that. Aim ≠ Achievement.
I honestly cannot fathom your stupidity.

Everything you have stated, as pointed out by myself and other posters, is your opinion. not FACT, your, OPINION, YOUR OPINION.

THERE IS CATEGORICALLY, NO EVIDENCE, TO STATE, MIKE ASHLEY, ONLY WANTS TO FINISH 17TH, THIS. IS. YOUR. OPINION.

You keep bleating on about aim v acheviment, so what i said was, based on your logic, anyone who isn't expected to finish inside the top 6 is simply aiming for survival, is that what you are suggesting? Yes or No?
 
Also McClaren got Boro to a UEFA Cup final 7 years before he was appointed at Newcastle.

His most recent achievement was failing to get Derby promoted after a total collapse in the second half of the season. I don't think it's spin to judge a manager on their more recent performance. Being England manager doesn't hold the creedence it once did, it's a second tier job these days at best.
probably worth a mention that he didn't exactly increase the value of his stock in the England job as he failed to qualify for the Euros, earned the title wally with the brolly and was promptly given the bullet.
Then he bombed out at wolfsburg, forest, twente and derby before Ashley decided he was the guy for him.
 
I honestly cannot fathom your stupidity.

Everything you have stated, as pointed out by myself and other posters, is your opinion. not FACT, your, OPINION, YOUR OPINION.

THERE IS CATEGORICALLY, NO EVIDENCE, TO STATE, MIKE ASHLEY, ONLY WANTS TO FINISH 17TH, THIS. IS. YOUR. OPINION.

You keep bleating on about aim v acheviment, so what i said was, based on your logic, anyone who isn't expected to finish inside the top 6 is simply aiming for survival, is that what you are suggesting? Yes or No?
They always spout bollocks as facts ,they thrive on lies.
 
probably worth a mention that he didn't exactly increase the value of his stock in the England job as he failed to qualify for the Euros, earned the title wally with the brolly and was promptly given the bullet.
Then he bombed out at wolfsburg, forest, twente and derby before Ashley decided he was the guy for him.

Good points raised by myself there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top