Yet you didn't, you chose to reply instead
-
The first stage of the forum upgrades has now been completed but they remain in a degraded state and are still being worked on.
Please read this thread for more details.
New user registrations are currently disabled.
June to July 2020 - NUFC
- Thread starter Black Cat Gypsy
- Start date
- Status
Eddie Hitler
Striker
Pappis Cisse?
Didnt read it though you dumb twatYet you didn't, you chose to reply instead
Didn't just scroll past it though did you
The Fish
Winger
Fitzgerald
Full Back
He's so tedious like I'm a mag and have scrolled past them for weeks now. Waffling on about human rights constantly
Barista
Midfield
No it wasn't more prestigious. You are getting confused with the UEFA cup for which clubs qualified on merit, not on whether the city was holding a trades fair - the UEFA cup is UEFA accredited and organised by UEFA unlike the fairground cup which is not recognised by UEFA as part of a club's European trophy record.
Last edited:
D
Dilligaf60
Guest
I might actually pay more attention to them if he had any idea of what it was he was talking about. He makes Donald Trump look like f***ing Plato.
It's gonna be a laugh either way man, either they can celebrate their gay bashing overlords, or we get to see them fume at Ashley and the media again.
This makes a refreshing change.
For the last month I've been constantly told that i don't care about human rights, that i just over look them, that I turn a blind eye to them and ignore them.
Now i'm being told that I constantly waffle on about them.
Exile 1968
Winger
Doesnt look like hes talking cobblers as you put it. Especially not judging by the replies. #neecans sweetie
we all have different opinions and you are most certainly entitled to yours, for me though he has his facts all wrong.
Ale taster
Striker
Particularly Newcastle fans.
The Fairs Cup proper triggers some, like.
Can't imagine why.
Exile 1968
Winger
Evidence? How you're right and hes wrong?
The Fish
Winger
The Ghost of Arca
Midfield
Tremendous
I wouldn't call it evidence just an opinion.
he's basing his premise on a WTO document that isn't released so it's hard to have an opinion on it but.....
he believes the WTO document finds the Saudi government responsible for the piracy and or funding it. They are not even making a ruling on that, the ruling was to decide if the Saudi's have been negligent in providing sufficient protection against piracy.
Doing something and not doing enough to stop something are very different things.
He believes that if the Saudi state does something, then as crown prince, Bin Salman has knowledge of it, as he chairs the pif that means he controls the PIF ergo PIF are complicit in anything the Saudi state does.
I think this is the main reason I disagree with him, as far as I can tell the PIF is a separate legal entity that acts autonomously on behalf of the Saudi State to invest it's wealth. As such I think PIF is subject to the O&D test along with who ever it puts forward on the board which I believe is the Governor of the PIF so he would be subject to the test not Bin Salman.
So unless the PIF has directly funded BeoutQ then I don't think there is any issue.
I'm not a barrister though so like I said earlier I could be well wide of the mark.
Roker Mackem
Striker
More likely to go through now id say. This is just a letter to fob her off
- Status
