• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

March to June 2020 - NEWCASTLE UTD fc

Status
Not open for further replies.
:lol:

Laughable how they imply they don't know anything about the Khasogghi incident. Not that it shocked the world and was all over the press. News to them all this controversy surrounding they wealthy owner.
Issues of a higher priority to worry about mate. Such as when’s Greggs open again.
 

For me it was, I didn't consider it beneath me as that implies some kind of superiority, it’s more I just don’t like the horrible kernts. Further to that if the same mob bought SAFC. I wouldn’t go back.

I think he’s struggling to understand how many people disliked the Saudis long before this. It was never apparent until this particular turd dropped out.



Obviously not you then ?
 
Last edited:
Not, it isn't about coercition here. Two relatives from the same royal family own two clubs in the same league. They can give points to eachother whenever the other needs it.

Assuming all the playing and coaching staff agree to throw the game.
Are you talking about when the teams meet each other or if they're playing against other teams?
 
Do you think chris wilder is likely to go along with that?
I don't know. He won't be their manager forever anyway.
This is the whole point of sports washing.
Very few fans will care who owns them if they're winning trophies.
Exactly. I have nothing against rich owners liking football and investing in it. But when a country decides they need to wash their barbaric image buying clubs in the Europe top leagues I find it disgusting really.
 
Last edited:
Don't think I have seen anyone that has said they have not heard about the Khasogghi incident.
But you have defended him. You have even made excuses. If his terrible human rights record doesn't bother read up on the court case that WWE shareholders have brought against the company. One of the items is the deal between the WWE and the Saudis. The WWE lied to them about the deal and money coming in. The Saudis aren't paying on time and aren't paying the agreed amounts. The stock price has plummeted. The State broadcaster went bust they have refused to pay any money owned on the deal. They have even delayed or refused to pay for TV rights and shows in their own country. Add on to this their refusal to pay for the TV rights for the PL and illegally streaming it from BeIN Sports. Maybe the deal is being delayed because MBS hasn't shown the hard cash yet?
I don't know. He won't be their manager forever anyway.

Exactly. I have nothing against rich owners liking football and investing in it. But when a country decides they need to wash their barbaric image buying clubs in the Europe top leagues I find it disgusting really.
It doesn't bother me if a billionaire wants to have a nice play thing and pump his money into it. But this is different. It's sportwashing and a PR stunt.
 
Last edited:
@AndyH what a life! Replying to everybody’s comments on a rivals forum.
Have a look at yourself ffs
It's a very pleasant Saturday the sun's out and 99 percent of nufc fans even in these difficult circumstances are probably enjoying time with their families. then you have the 1 percent of mag fans who constantly spend their life on this forum.
What a sad pathetic life they must lead that AndyH poster must be 1 sad bastard.
 
As I said to the other lad this is not what a conflict of interest is.

This would be the likelihood to coerce the owner of another club to act in your clubs interest and not theirs test, which doesn't exist for obvious reasons.
This test you say that doesn’t exist, would it be first one by any chance:
Disqualifying Events
- They have power or influence over another League club.
- They hold a significant interest in another League club.

You seem to be of the opinion only the second test exists, however that is only one of many. The PIF involvement certainly falls foul of the first test due to the highly publicised events which you are determined to overlook.

I’m not saying the F.A. won’t turn a blind eye to this in their pursuit of more money, but surely even you with your blinkers on can now see this.
 


Obviously not you then ?
:lol:
 
This test you say that doesn’t exist, would it be first one by any chance:
Disqualifying Events
- They have power or influence over another League club.
- They hold a significant interest in another League club.

You seem to be of the opinion only the second test exists, however that is only one of many. The PIF involvement certainly falls foul of the first test due to the highly publicised events which you are determined to overlook.

I’m not saying the F.A. won’t turn a blind eye to this in their pursuit of more money, but surely even you with your blinkers on can now see this.
So basically Charles and Harry can't buy 2 clubs in the PL, but some dodgy royal saudis can?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top