March to June 2020 - NEWCASTLE UTD fc

[mag in peace]

aye thats right..but if she was getting 10 per cent for brokering it..she would be getting it off the other partners..not off ashley..becayuse she is the broker for the other partners..not for the seller..buty the only person to do a deal with her so far is ashley..why would ashley be bunging her 10 per cent? its the people she is working for that are supposed to be doing that?

Unless she is an intermediate for both parties? Nobody knows and there is no point guessing.

 

[gazc24]

I'm not saying I think it will happen or that we will be cash rich etc but now is the ideal time to purchase anything really, especially if your wealth is unquestionable. If you had money now you would snap up property etc whilst it was low. If the game went bust and you could sweep in and pick what you wanted it makes the most sense.

Suppose your right, but I just dont see where the money is in it in the days to come

 

[mag in peace]

Suppose your right, but I just dont see where the money is in it in the days to come

Nobody knows anything at all about anything at the minute and it's daft pretending otherwise. The season could restart in like 3 weeks or it might be totally cancelled. Who knows how it looks? That won't bother the Saudi's (if they are involved/interested) because whatever happens will not affect them.

 

[kildaremackem]

The Reuben brothers are listed in Companies House mate. JV1 is linked to PCP and all the other holding accounts. That's not hearsay. It's there in black and white that they are involved. Their net worth can easily be found too it's published.

She is also the broker, of course she doesn't have money. She didn't have the money to buy Man City either yet brokered that deal. Honestly, you sir are an idiot and I'm not just talking about your inability to form sentences.

jvi has got satevley as a director yes..and its offiuce address is a building owned by the ruebens...but they arent directors of jvi nor are they listed as persons of signifcant control..the entity listed as being the controlling party of jv1 limited is called rb sports and media limited..which has directors who are not the ruebn brothers..i mean rb sports and media could stand for rueben brothers i dont know..and those directors could be rueben brothers employees..but thats all conjecture..

 

[Bears Beets]

The snide “mag in peace” showing a mag is never in peace on here.

 

[Wolfhunter]

jvi has got satevley as a director yes..and its offiuce address is a building owned by the ruebens...but they arent directors of jvi nor are they listed as persons of signifcant control..the entity listed as being the controlling party of jv1 limited is called rb sports and media limited..which has directors who are not the ruebn brothers..i mean rb sports and media could stand for rueben brothers i dont know..and those directors could be rueben brothers employees..but thats all conjecture..

It is the Rueben brothers though. It's not conjecture!

 

[Banks]

aye thats right..but if she was getting 10 per cent for brokering it..she would be getting it off the other partners..not off ashley..becayuse she is the broker for the other partners..not for the seller..buty the only person to do a deal with her so far is ashley..why would ashley be bunging her 10 per cent? its the people she is working for that are supposed to be doing that?

A logical answer to that would be they are both British and the other party's aren't.

Would make sense for Stavely to sort on her own than involve the others especially if she knows she's guaranteed her costs back.

 

[kildaremackem]

It is the Rueben brothers though. It's not conjecture!

/
hoe do you know? im not saying your wrong im saying prove it..there is an obvious link which is they own that building but...

 

[Secret Visage]

Nobody knows anything at all about anything at the minute and it's daft pretending otherwise. The season could restart in like 3 weeks or it might be totally cancelled. Who knows how it looks? That won't bother the Saudi's (if they are involved/interested) because whatever happens will not affect them.

I'll ask again as you didn't answer : So why is she putting £17 million in then?

The £13 million borrowed and secured against her companies, pending a potetntial payout from her court case, then equates to 10 per cent. Not as an "intermediary", but as a shareholder in her own right.

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

The Reuben brothers are listed in Companies House mate. JV1 is linked to PCP and all the other holding accounts. That's not hearsay. It's there in black and white that they are involved. Their net worth can easily be found too it's published.

She is also the broker, of course she doesn't have money. She didn't have the money to buy Man City either yet brokered that deal. Honestly, you sir are an idiot and I'm not just talking about your inability to form sentences.

She didn't get any shares in Man City though. Getting a stake is a bit more than being a broker.

 

[mag in peace]

jvi has got satevley as a director yes..and its offiuce address is a building owned by the ruebens...but they arent directors of jvi nor are they listed as persons of signifcant control..the entity listed as being the controlling party of jv1 limited is called rb sports and media limited..which has directors who are not the ruebn brothers..i mean rb sports and media could stand for rueben brothers i dont know..and those directors could be rueben brothers employees..but thats all conjecture..

I cannot believe I am doing this and it's the last time I'm going to engage with you and your flip flopping. RB stands for Rueben Brothers, the directors listed in companies House are also listed here -

You must be logged on to see external links

They are the Business directors. It's not conjecture. They are involved.

 

[Wolfhunter]

/
hoe do you know? im not saying your wrong im saying prove it..there is an obvious link which is they own that building but...

No I'm not going to go looking for links for you.

The Rueben brothers are involved. The Saudis are probably going to be involved.

Staveley can't afford to buy the club on her own and Ashley isn't just going to give it to her.

Staveley has paid an 13m deposit on the club but at the same time Ashley has for some reason loaned her money or shares.

The rest is guessing, but for some reason you now understand less than you did originally and nobody can tell you anymore because they just don't know!

I think for your own sanity and every body else's you should leave it there...I'm going to!

 

[mag in peace]

The snide “mag in peace” showing a mag is never in peace on here.

Literally no idea how you can come to that conclusion? I'm literally stating nobody knows anything , myself involved. I'm just not acting like I do or suggesting it's going to be great or awful because literally nobody knows.

She didn't get any shares in Man City though. Getting a stake is a bit more than being a broker.

And don't you think she will have learnt from that? Imagine if she took 10% instead of 10m do you not think that would be worth much more now?

 

[Secret Visage]

No I'm not going to go looking for links for you.

The Rueben brothers are involved. The Saudis are probably going to be involved.

Staveley can't afford to buy the club on her own and Ashley isn't just going to give it to her.

Staveley has paid an 13m deposit on the club but at the same time Ashley has for some reason loaned her money or shares.

The rest is guessing, but for some reason you now understand less than you did originally and nobody can tell you anymore because they just don't know!

I think for your own sanity and every body else's you should leave it there...I'm going to!

No, no, you are wrong, she's getting it as an "intemediate" (sic) according to Mag in Pieces.

 

[kildaremackem]

I cannot believe I am doing this and it's the last time I'm going to engage with you and your flip flopping. RB stands for Rueben Brothers, the directors listed in companies House are also listed here -

You must be logged on to see external links

They are the Business directors. It's not conjecture. They are involved.

ok great. thats all i asked for -evidence. they are now in business with staveley for something...jvi has been incorporated since january..she becmae a director more recently..

 

[mag in peace]

I'll ask again as you didn't answer : So why is she putting £17 million in then?

The £13 million borrowed and secured against her companies, pending a potetntial payout from her court case, then equates to 10 per cent. Not as an "intermediary", but as a shareholder in her own right.

Like I have said, 100x now - I do not know. Do you? Does anybody other than AS or MA and their teams? I highly doubt it. Why are we even speculating about it.

No, no, you are wrong, she's getting it as an "intemediate" (sic) according to Mag in Pieces.

No, I never actually stated that, I claimed it could potentially be the case. I was offering a different less negative view to Grumpy's opinion, whilst stating all along from the very beginning nobody f***ing knows.

 

[Secret Visage]

Like I have said, 100x now - I do not know. Do you? Does anybody other than AS or MA and their teams? I highly doubt it. Why are we even speculating about it.


No, I never actually stated that, I claimed it could potentially be the case. I was offering a different less negative view to Grumpy's opinion, whilst stating all along from the very beginning nobody f***ing knows.

"The terms of the loan security with SJH states any proceeds from the court case must be paid into specific bank accounts and a balance of £13m left in those until the debt is settled.

This suggests Staveley is putting £17m of her own money into the Toon takeover now and will pay £13m plus generous interest later."

 

[mag in peace]

"The terms of the loan security with SJH states any proceeds from the court case must be paid into specific bank accounts and a balance of £13m left in those until the debt is settled.

This suggests Staveley is putting £17m of her own money into the Toon takeover now and will pay £13m plus generous interest later."

Where has this come from? Which tabloid as I'm sure they get everything right and have highly reputable sources...

 

[Grumpy Old Man]

Like I have said, 100x now - I do not know. Do you? Does anybody other than AS or MA and their teams? I highly doubt it. Why are we even speculating about it.


No, I never actually stated that, I claimed it could potentially be the case. I was offering a different less negative view to Grumpy's opinion, whilst stating all along from the very beginning nobody f***ing knows.

Look, I'm red and white through and through. If there's a way that this could all go tits up for you, I'm bound to want it to happen.

 

[Wolfhunter]

"The terms of the loan security with SJH states any proceeds from the court case must be paid into specific bank accounts and a balance of £13m left in those until the debt is settled.

This suggests Staveley is putting £17m of her own money into the Toon takeover now and will pay £13m plus generous interest later."

The Sun has it a little twisted as usual. But as I said, it's mainly guesswork atm. For a change I think it'll all be clear soon as I think it's actually happening this time!