Scotty 1978
Striker
But no di canio nazi salutes
That’s disappointing
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But no di canio nazi salutes
Would you not be determined with the backing she has behind her ..
Couldn't the 'loan' which in essence becomes her shares not be her commission? She charged Man City 10m for brokering that deal?
You protest this much about Sheff Utd? Please show me your distaste in a thread created on here about it.
Loans have to be paid back. A "loan", as you put it, wouldn't carry a charge, and certainly not one with punitive clauses like this one. Fat Mike wants the money back, that's for sure.
The charge thing is to do with barclays.
Does rather sound like Big Bad Mike is fronting Saviour Staverley the capital to get the deal off the ground.I didn't say that. I'm saying the structure looks odd. Ashley is effectively lending Staveley the money from Newcastle's holding company to buy Newcastle. I'll make that even more obvious; the purchase is dependent on the buyers borrowing money from the seller. Great start.
NOTHING would surprise me where Ashley is concerned. Nothing he does is straightforward. Whatever he does, it’ll be for his benefit.I didn't say that. I'm saying the structure looks odd. Ashley is effectively lending Staveley the money from Newcastle's holding company to buy Newcastle. I'll make that even more obvious; the purchase is dependent on the buyers borrowing money from the seller. Great start.
Loans have to be paid back. A "loan", as you put it, wouldn't carry a charge, and certainly not one with punitive clauses like this one. Fat Mike wants the money back, that's for sure.
Make a small part of the purchase. The cash proceeds from the remainder go to him with a guaranteed cash flow from a loan.It's not liquidating anything if you're lending the buyer the money to make the purchase.
Are you going to protest against as much as you did against Ashley? Didn’t think so. Good old football fans, fickle when it suits!
Does rather sound like Big Bad Mike is fronting Saviour Staverley the capital to get the deal off the ground.
I agree...very determined...she must see the vast potential there is....and there isI mean in general as she has came back a few times with different backers
So the fundamental question is why would he do that unless he is a distressed seller? He is not a charitable man.Does rather sound like Big Bad Mike is fronting Saviour Staverley the capital to get the deal off the ground.
I really don’t give a shite about the politics, dont f***ing say you would too, you’d all be lying.
My thoughts exactly. In terms of wealth, Staveley makes Donald look like Jeff Bezos. And why aren't the Reuben Brothers fronting up for her the way Donald did for Methven?
I know you don’t care about the politics, only when it suits you. Quite happy to have your MP whinge in parliament about Ashley about the running of the club, but couldn’t give a shit about anybody else. You try to portray yourselves as some superior beings with socialist views. Call all us Sunderland fans ‘scruffs etc’ and then have a collection outside the ground for food banks for your own residentsYou couldn’t make it up.
Indeed, relative peanuts to them and they'd have the deal done and dusted with Mike out of the way far quicker.My thoughts exactly. In terms of wealth, Staveley makes Donald look like Jeff Bezos. And why aren't the Reuben Brothers fronting up for her the way Donald did for Methven?
I agree...very determined...she must see the vast potential there is....and there is
I would be the same with your club ....the potential is there
Ashley would never buy into it.
Take a look at all of this generalising.