• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.

March to June 2020 - NEWCASTLE UTD fc

Status
Not open for further replies.
What A Waster said:
You must be logged on to see external links
Saudi fund is referred to as PIF, PCP is Staveley's company.
Telegraph stating here PIF still involved.
Sky sports saying PIF still on for 80%
Original article said 80% PIF

The article you're sharing from Louise Keys says they aren't mentioned in the initial documents today.

Given that you erroneously thought Newcastle paid in installments for players, and had debts of £200m less than half an hour ago, you seem to be speaking with total authority on this as well, contradicting what the majority or reports are saying and not cross checking your sources.
Click to expand...
i thought all clubs paid in installme =nts..so i wS WORNTg? HHAS HAPPEND BEFORE..
the companies hosue filing is a legal document...at preset it shows a relationnship between a mike ashley company and pcp..the saudis arenrt in it..has she knowingly filed a false report at companies house? thats acrime?
 

kildaremackem said:
they will sell..like they did with harry maguire..get a proper price and thebn by a replacement with the money is also good, or better than what they sold.
man utd paid the dough for maguire..leicester got the dough for maguire..who do you think has come out thr right end of the deal?

forgot the game tbh..was there but forgot about it whe posting hree..i usually only remember the memorbale games and that wasnt one..
Click to expand...

It's one deal.

Il tell you this now. In football the club's who always sell their prized assets do nothing. Yes there is a good chain but selling a player every season to balance the books just weakens your team.

There will come a time Leicester need to just sell their squad players if they are to compete. We'll see if they are out performing man utd in 5 seasons. Il tell you now without significant investment they won't be
 
Dave the painter said:
It'll be the same as the Man City deal. Staverly broke that and citys owners didnt get put onto the deal until after it went through.
Click to expand...
well yes it could be..but whats potentially difdferent about this is..
stavely was the rboker on the man city deal..the fixer..she was never a shareholder..this implies she will be a shareholder...
 
kildaremackem said:
i thought all clubs paid in installme =nts..so i wS WORNTg? HHAS HAPPEND BEFORE..
the companies hosue filing is a legal document...at preset it shows a relationnship between a mike ashley company and pcp..the saudis arenrt in it..has she knowingly filed a false report at companies house? thats acrime?
Click to expand...
More than likely the saudis will come and buy 80% worth of shares after Staverly and Reubens have bought the club.
 
Banks said:
It's one deal.

Il tell you this now. In football the club's who always sell their prized assets do nothing. Yes there is a good chain but selling a player every season to balance the books just weakens your team.

There will come a time Leicester need to just sell their squad players if they are to compete. We'll see if they are out performing man utd in 5 seasons. Il tell you now without significant investment they won't be
Click to expand...
leicester arent doing it to balance the books..rtheir ownwers..who are of an ordwer of magbitude richer than stavelye..have oput a lot of cash in..and are richer than the glaziers of man utd..
 
f he does 'sell' i wonder how he'll keep his claws in as part of the deal? Aren't Rangers not completely free of his cluthches years on?

Will he keep his fingers in the retail pie? Will the advertising be part of the deal?

Can't see him moving on lock stock and barrel.
 
kildaremackem said:
well yes it could be..but whats potentially difdferent about this is..
stavely was the rboker on the man city deal..the fixer..she was never a shareholder..this implies she will be a shareholder...
Click to expand...

Last time she took 10m commission, this times she wants shares because it could potentially be worth more. It makes perfect business sense. I bet she wished she had 10% in Man City rather than 10m
 
VXi said:
f he does 'sell' i wonder how he'll keep his claws in as part of the deal? Aren't Rangers not completely free of his cluthches years on?

Will he keep his fingers in the retail pie? Will the advertising be part of the deal?

Can't see him moving on lock stock and barrel.
Click to expand...
why nit..he would make a porofit..he is in the hole mi;llions noiw..this way he makes aprofit..
 
VXi said:
f he does 'sell' i wonder how he'll keep his claws in as part of the deal? Aren't Rangers not completely free of his cluthches years on?

Will he keep his fingers in the retail pie? Will the advertising be part of the deal?

Can't see him moving on lock stock and barrel.
Click to expand...

Rangers weren't bought by people with this level of finance.
 
VXi said:
f he does 'sell' i wonder how he'll keep his claws in as part of the deal? Aren't Rangers not completely free of his cluthches years on?

Will he keep his fingers in the retail pie? Will the advertising be part of the deal?

Can't see him moving on lock stock and barrel.
Click to expand...

On previous deals didn't he want to have ownership of all sponsorship deals or something similar?
 
kildaremackem said:
i thought all clubs paid in installme =nts..so i wS WORNTg? HHAS HAPPEND BEFORE..
the companies hosue filing is a legal document...at preset it shows a relationnship between a mike ashley company and pcp..the saudis arenrt in it..has she knowingly filed a false report at companies house? thats acrime?
Click to expand...


Staveley has been trying to buy Newcastle since October 2017 and had a series of bids rejected by Ashley but the key – the game-changer - is the involvement of PIF, which is chaired by Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and the vast backing that potentially brings.

The Saudis have been considering how best to make a move into football for some time and have examined buying other clubs. Questions will be asked to why, with their wealth, the Saudis want to bring in minority partners but it is not unusual to the way they structure deals.

The fund is central to Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, a plan spearheaded by Prince Mohammed to diversify the economy away from oil and is also the driving force behind the country’s ambitions to develop new tourist and entertainment industries.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top