Chemtrails

Status
Not open for further replies.
niceonemarra said:
What are you taking about? Why haven't you produced evidence the planes were nicked by terrorists? That was the question, not that planes hit the buildings.
Click to expand...

The hijackers were known to be part of alqaeda. Those same blokes were on flight lists. Those same blokes were cross referenced with seat plans by flight staff and those they called. Those same blokes went to flight schools.

Who do you think hijacked them?

WIBBLE.
 


dangermows said:
The hijackers were known to be part of alqaeda. Those same blokes were on flight lists. Those same blokes were cross referenced with seat plans by flight staff and those they called. Those same blokes went to flight schools.

Who do you think hijacked them?

WIBBLE.
Click to expand...
So there is no evidence they nicked the planes then. That's that cleared up.

Who do I think nicked them? All I can say is it definitely isn't the 'terrorists' being blamed for it as the flight school they went to investigated their time at the school and they said it would be impossible they could have flown the planes on 9/11 as they were so bad at flying they couldn't even manage to fly the most basic of aircraft because they were thick as fuck.

If you don't accept that don't come back at me, take it up with the flight school that did the investigation, it shouldn't be too hard to find a contact email address for them if you really want to confirm it.
 
dangermows said:
I don't even think they really believe them. Take 9/11. They make a point. It gets blarn apart. They don't even acknowledge the blarness, and just raise another issue and repeat.
Click to expand...
Similar to spiritualist
niceonemarra said:
So there is no evidence they nicked the planes then. That's that cleared up.

Who do I think nicked them? All I can say is it definitely isn't the 'terrorists' being blamed for it as the flight school they went to investigated their time at the school and they said it would be impossible they could have flown the planes on 9/11 as they were so bad at flying they couldn't even manage to fly the most basic of aircraft because they were thick as fuck.

If you don't accept that don't come back at me, take it up with the flight school that did the investigation, it shouldn't be too hard to find a contact email address for them if you really want to confirm it.
Click to expand...
Was it not just a case of steering it. The pilot took off and they had no intention of landing.
 
Last edited:
the boot said:
Similar to spiritualist

Was it not just a case of steering it. The pilot took off and they had no intention of landing.
Click to expand...
The flight school said no chance they could have flown the planes into the towers, that's all I know.
 
niceonemarra said:
The flight school said no chance they could have flown the planes into the towers, that's all I know.
Click to expand...

They didn't say that. That's all I know.

But let's pretend they did. So we had four blokes training to fly planes. All of which didn't want to practice take offs or landings. But then, by pure chance, hijackings took place, with those men on board, but others actually flew them and these men were innocent victims.

Interesting.
 
Last edited:
niceonemarra said:
The flight school said no chance they could have flown the planes into the towers, that's all I know.
Click to expand...

they didnt have to do a great deal once they had the pilots hijacked... didnt need to change airspeed, land or anything ... get th pilots to fly to washington or New York where they thing they are just being hijacked to the airports and then once in the vicinity its no more than steering them. if they hit a target great... if they dont they still cause great carnage in a densely packed area
dangermows said:
They didn't say that. That's all I know.

But let's pretend they did. So we had four blokes training to fly planes. All of which didn't want to practice take offs or landings. But then, by pure chance, hijackings took place, with those men on board, but others actually flew them and these men were innocent victims.

Interesting.
Click to expand...

spot on.. what was the reason for them wanting to learn to fly.... or in this instance crash
 
Last edited:
niceonemarra said:
So there is no evidence they nicked the planes then. That's that cleared up.

Who do I think nicked them? All I can say is it definitely isn't the 'terrorists' being blamed for it as the flight school they went to investigated their time at the school and they said it would be impossible they could have flown the planes on 9/11 as they were so bad at flying they couldn't even manage to fly the most basic of aircraft because they were thick as fuck.

If you don't accept that don't come back at me, take it up with the flight school that did the investigation, it shouldn't be too hard to find a contact email address for them if you really want to confirm it.
Click to expand...
Who do you think "nicked" them
 
Epping said:
they didnt have to do a great deal once they had the pilots hijacked... didnt need to change airspeed, land or anything ... get th pilots to fly to washington or New York where they thing they are just being hijacked to the airports and then once in the vicinity its no more than steering them. if they hit a target great... if they dont they still cause great carnage in a densely packed area
Click to expand...
Just to confirm the flight school did say it, its been publicised so its available to look up should you want to.
I can understand why they said it would be impossible for them to fly the planes, I was lucky enough to drive a yacht a few year ago and could I fuck keep it in a straight line once I steered to the left or right. The terrorists had never flown that type of plane before and … awe fuck it I honestly don't care what people believe anyway its a chemtrails thread.
monkeytassle said:
Who do you think "nicked" them
Click to expand...
I give up mate, if anyone wants to continue the debate bump the 9/11 thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
zwartekat said:
Where is this documented?
Click to expand...

It's not. Only bit that's even close to what the wibblers suggest is one of the four was said to be of poor ability (flight 77 pilot iirc). But you know, that translates into instructors said none of the hijackers could've hit the towers.
 
Last edited:
niceonemarra said:
Just to confirm the flight school did say it, its been publicised so its available to look up should you want to.
I can understand why they said it would be impossible for them to fly the planes, I was lucky enough to drive a yacht a few year ago and could I fuck keep it in a straight line once I steered to the left or right. The terrorists had never flown that type of plane before and … awe fuck it I honestly don't care what people believe anyway its a chemtrails thread.

I give up mate, if anyone wants to continue the debate bump the 9/11 thread.
Click to expand...
Assumed you wouldn't answer a simple question.
 
I'll only answer any more 9/11 questions on the 9/11 thread.
 
dangermows said:
It's not. Only bit that's even close to what the wibblers suggest is one of the four was said to be of poor ability (flight 77 pilot iirc). But you know, that translates into instructors said none of the hijackers could've hit the towers.
Click to expand...
I sort of guessed it wouldn't be before I asked but it's interesting to see how far a crackpot will take their nonsense.
niceonemarra said:
I'll only answer any more 9/11 questions on the 9/11 thread.
Click to expand...
It's ok, I think everyone already knows you're full of it.
 
Last edited:
zwartekat said:
I sort of guessed it wouldn't be before I asked but it's interesting to see how far a crackpot will take their nonsense.

It's ok, I think everyone already knows you're full of it.
Click to expand...
Can you stop the abusive posts please.
 
niceonemarra said:
If there is evidence the those terrorists nicked the planes then post it! It should be really easy and will clear this up immediately. I'll await to see the evidence.
Click to expand...

Sorry, did you only read part of my post?

The inquiry established the facts.

If those facts don't fit in with your view of what 'actually happened' then you need to do the disproving, not I
 
cosmicchris00 said:
Sorry, did you only read part of my post?

The inquiry established the facts.

If those facts don't fit in with your view of what 'actually happened' then you need to do the disproving, not I
Click to expand...
Sorry mate I'm not discussing 9/11 anymore on this thread, I'm happy to discuss it on the 9/11 thread so just bump that if you want a reply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top