James Fowler - SAFC Assistant Manager - Gone?

Status
Not open for further replies.
chunksafc said:
You as a mod have a right to reply, the banned posters don't.

You have been accused

You were accused of saying GOM had lied, in your position as a mod you could refute that, therefore I assume you will offer other posters the right to reply
Click to expand...

I answered that in post #539.

I did not accuse anyone of lying, I said it was bollocks to suggest that Reiver was banned as a result of a set up.

As far as I can see no one has been refused the right to reply.
samaistonsrightfoot said:
In that case, instead of pressing the report button 1 billion times can I just leave this here instead?

@Jay

Ohhhh has he gone already, it won't link?
Click to expand...

I can confirm that Jay is banned.
 
Last edited:


Pancho said:
I answered that in post #539.

I did not accuse anyone of lying, I said it was bollocks to suggest that Reiver was banned as a result of a set up.

As far as I can see no one has been refused the right to reply.
Click to expand...
Where you refuted that you accused anyone of lying? I'm on my mobile so. Can't see post numbers.

I again assume that anyone accused and subsequently banned will therefore jav e the same right to reply as you have?
 
chunksafc said:
Where you refuted that you accused anyone of lying? I'm on my mobile so. Can't see post numbers.

I again assume that anyone accused and subsequently banned will therefore jav e the same right to reply as you have?
Click to expand...

Correct. I refuted the suggestion that I accused GOM of lying. Simply being wrong about something and lying are entirely different animals.

I still don't understand what you're trying to say in your last paragraph.
 
Abu Dhabi Red and White said:
Nice attempt to lead a mod into an argument...
Click to expand...
Not attempting to lead him into anything, mearly pointing out he had the right to reply while banned posters dont
Pancho said:
Correct. I refuted the suggestion that I accused GOM of lying. Simply being wrong about something and lying are entirely different animals.

I still don't understand what you're trying to say in your last paragraph.
Click to expand...
Well it's fairly simple, you have refuted the suggestion, do banned posters get the same opportunity?
 
Last edited:
MADBOB THE MAKEM said:
Scotty I have just got back on here on Tuesday, I am saying nowt from now on, not only did I get bollocked by Pancho for what he deemed as bad speak, but our club legend dragged me over the coals for 2 bits I put out about the Campbell farce, so mate its head down for a while.
Click to expand...

You’re saying nowt because you know nowt.
Pancho said:
I answered that in post #539.

I did not accuse anyone of lying, I said it was bollocks to suggest that Reiver was banned as a result of a set up.

As far as I can see no one has been refused the right to reply.


I can confirm that Jay is banned.
Click to expand...

About time.
 
chunksafc said:
Not attempting to lead him into anything, mearly pointing out he had the right to reply while banned posters dont

Well it's fairly simple, you have refuted the suggestion, do banned posters get the same opportunity?
Click to expand...

Right, got your drift now.

Yes, of course banned posters, when they return, can reply to any comments made in their absence and I can assure you they often do.
 
Pancho said:
I answered that in post #539.

I did not accuse anyone of lying, I said it was bollocks to suggest that Reiver was banned as a result of a set up.

As far as I can see no one has been refused the right to reply.


I can confirm that Jay is banned.
Click to expand...

Glad he's been banned like. Unlike some I don't mind the mags being on here in general, at times it's given us a cracking laugh when things have gone wrong for them and very occasionally it's alright hearing their point of view on things, but some mag WUMs have needed weeding out for ages. Plus when the "canny mags" let their mask slip they should be fucked off as well because all it does is provoke SAFC fans to bite back, especially after a few pints, and when it's our fans who end up going too far and being banned it contributes to the feeling that a load of WUMs can get away with anything while Sunderland fans are banned. Mind trying to moderate this place must be a f***ing nightmare
 
I have always found @Pancho ok as a mod, I am sure he has banned me before (obviously incorrectly).It would be nice to know why you have been banned and have the opportunity to put forward a reasoned reason for the offending post.

Is there any review of posters with multiple log ins? Because there should be.
 
Pancho said:
Right, got your drift now.

Yes, of course banned posters, when they return, can reply to any comments made in their absence and I can assure you they often do.
Click to expand...
So banned ppset
Pancho said:
Right, got your drift now.

Yes, of course banned posters, when they return, can reply to any comments made in their absence and I can assure you they often do.
Click to expand...
So banned posters have to wait till they return, yet mods can reply the same day?

Not very fair really?
 
Jeffers said:
I've been lurking/posing on here for 10 years marra. I'm braced for a witch hunt if I'm wrong. I remember when I physically witnessed Craig Gordon lifting the scarf at AOL and posted on here. Got utter pelters for about 3 hours until it was announced then was hailed a hero by the same bassas that were hurling the abuse. Same when I mentioned that we were signing Adnan Januzaj. So whilst this one isn't something I've personally witnessed I do entirely trust the person who told me so it's all in good faith.
Click to expand...
These things are quickly forgotten about on here mate. Wouldn't worry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top