• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

James Fowler - SAFC Assistant Manager - Gone?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Realist said:
Can't ban all mags on here like, it is a forum whether Sunderland or not. If they are breaking the rules like anyone else then I'm sure they do get banned. Same goes for our own fans accusing new members to be mags when that is not the case at all, they try to cause reactions also.
Click to expand...
New member....mmmm..............We have already been warned about you lot joining
 

Julio said:
How come some many Mag WUMS get away with murder? Genuine question
Click to expand...

If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.
chunksafc said:
Will you be giving others the right to explain their posts?
Click to expand...

That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
 
Last edited:
Pancho said:
If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.


That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
Click to expand...

No i was just asking about all the Mag wums who get away with murder.

I will report them see if owt happens
 
Pancho said:
If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.


That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
Click to expand...
You as a mod have a right to reply, the banned posters don't.

You have been accused
Pancho said:
If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.


That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
Click to expand...
You were accused of saying GOM had lied, in your position as a mod you could refute that, therefore I assume you will offer other posters the right to reply
 
Pancho said:
If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.


That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
Click to expand...

I get that Pancho lad, but when there's obvious mags pretending to be SAFC ( @Jay for example) can you not mark them forever with "lost magpie"?
I think that is what pisses a lot of people off.
 
Pancho said:
If you are trying to perpetuate the dog eared trope that decent mlf's get banned for no reason whilst mags get away with murder then please pack it in.

No one, I repeat no one, gets banned for nothing. It's a last resort. Members are banned for either a series of infractions or for something serious such as a libellous post which would justify an instaban.

At the gaffer's behest this board is relatively lightly moderated. It's intentionally not like RAWK and members of all colours are welcome. This one of the reasons why this board is so consistently popular.

The downside of that approach however is that we attract our fair share of wums.

We try to weed them out as best we can but we do rely on members using the report button.

Please remember that just because someone has the misfortune to follow them up the road that's not grounds for a ban - but blatant wummery is.

I repeat, please use the report button.


That's a bit too cryptic for me.

Could you please expand?
Click to expand...

In that case, instead of pressing the report button 1 billion times can I just leave this here instead?

@Jay

Ohhhh has he gone already, it won't link?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top