horselover
Striker
f***ing get in ya bastard
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's hard to say. It's reasonable to say that it's probably already happened, and if not it's certainly going to.Does this news that their holding company having been discovered mean that it's all actually done (and just waiting for announcment), or is there still more to do (such as FPP Sunderland buying the shares from Sunderland LTD)? @Grumpy Old Man
If you own 75% you own 75% but have all the sayI think you're correct.
looks pukka to me mate.. from my dealings@Grumpy Old Man is this pukka, marra?
As I understand it being passive has nothing to do with the level of ownership, it’s about whether someone is involved in the management of the entity
Absolutely, you can be a shareholder without being a director. Ashley isn't a director of the Mags, for example, and Abramovich isn't a director at Chelsea.As I understand it being passive has nothing to do with the level of ownership, it’s about whether someone is involved in the management of the entity
It's happened.HOLY FUCK IT'S HAPPENING![]()
So you are thinking just not named? But won't Donald own 25%? or because this is a new company he won't be named or someit.
I noticed that as well. HAHANew Castle Delaware
Absolutely, you can be a shareholder without being a director. Ashley isn't a director of the Mags, for example, and Abramovich isn't a director at Chelsea.
I think this company will in turn own the vast majority of SAFC and that this is a 4 way split between the billionaires