• The forums will be unavailable for a few hours on Saturday 6th June, when they do return they will initially be in a degraded state with some features missing, but normal posting/reading will be possible. The main website will not be affected by these updates.
    New user registrations are currently disabled.
    Some other features of the forum are also currently disabled.

Takeover Rumours

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you're suggesting I'm a fake account or claiming to be ITK you're mistaken. I'm just a fan who has lurked for years. I only created my account because I think this is big. I do think there will be a lot of nonsense spewed out when the news goes live so I signed up. I know the drill. Call me a mag and I will tough it out.

Rogue Badger eh? so a rogue black and white, a fifth columnist?
 

If you're suggesting I'm a fake account or claiming to be ITK you're mistaken. I'm just a fan who has lurked for years. I only created my account because I think this is big. I do think there will be a lot of nonsense spewed out when the news goes live so I signed up. I know the drill. Call me a mag and I will tough it out.

@Grumpy Old Man already warned us about you and you aren't to be trusted.
When your banned can you inbox on here still or not?

Nope.
 
Not within my gift is simply an expression.

You are entirely correct in that we try to do our best and yes occasionally we do get it wrong.

We do tend to adopt a very safety first approach to potential libel or slander, as getting it wrong could put both the member and the board's owner at risk.

Just going from memory and confirmed by the site's logs I have never issued you with a warning or a ban.

In any event, as per the board's terms and conditions, moderators are not obliged to offer explanations for their actions but often do upon request.
With that in mind, I suffered a ban recently but with no idea what for. I guessed it was something to do with the ownership but I don't have a clue.
 
Fair enough. I wish there was a way of communicating it at the time of the ban.

Moderators generally do not have time to give chapter and verse on every post deletion or warning so we tend to reply upon the board's default notices.

Hopefully you won't find if necessary but if you do need an explanation in future then you can always pm the moderator online.
 
Moderators generally do not have time to give chapter and verse on every post deletion or warning so we tend to reply upon the board's default notices.

Hopefully you won't find if necessary but if you do need an explanation in future then you can always pm the moderator online.
I have no idea where they are (the warnings). I have read your reply to somebody much earlier in this thread where you explained where they were but by Christ can I find them
 
Moderators generally do not have time to give chapter and verse on every post deletion or warning so we tend to reply upon the board's default notices.

Hopefully you won't find if necessary but if you do need an explanation in future then you can always pm the moderator online.
How many people do ou ban on an average day pancho?You cannot take two minutes to explain a ban?if it was 50 or 60 people i could understant but ten or so why cannot you explain the ban?
 
The bannings on this place are way OTT mind.
What I will say is though that I don’t exactly think this thread will miss rivs input on slightest.

He claimed this was a done deal 3 weeks ago and still nothing confirmed. I think it may happen but it’s safe to say it wasn’t done 3 weeks ago if still nothing announced now.

He then claimed he’d been told it would be announced 2 Fridays ago. Again still nothing.

The rest of the stuff has been a lot of name dropping with vague comments about how he cant say too much (insert winky emoji).

He’s pretty much posted on this thread non stop without really saying anything.

Life goes on and I’m sure people will get over yet another reiver banning.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top